The Impact of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Iranian EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning: A Comparison of Traditional and CALL-based Instruction

Seyyed Ali Hosseini, Zahra Amirkhani

Abstract


Technology's impact spans diverse human activities, notably in education. Educators and researchers have increasingly focused on computer-assisted vocabulary learning, recognizing it as a crucial component of computer-assisted language learning (CALL). The present study, conducted with one hundred Iranian intermediate-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, intended to address the impact of Computer-Assisted Language Learning CALL instruction on vocabulary learning. The study addressed whether there is a significant relationship between CALL instruction and Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary learning and whether there is any difference in the impact of CALL instruction on Iranian male and female EFL learners' vocabulary learning. The statistical analysis involved t-tests and descriptive statistics for comparing pre-test and post-test results, contributing valuable insights into the effectiveness of CALL in the context of Iranian EFL education and its equitable impact across genders. The present study's findings revealed a substantial improvement in vocabulary learning among participants who underwent CALL instruction. The study also found that male and female language learners did not display significant performance differences under CALL instruction. This study contributes valuable insights into the role of CALL in Iranian EFL education, emphasizing its potential as an effective tool for enhancing vocabulary learning while promoting gender-neutral outcomes.


Keywords


Computer-Assisted Language Learning; vocabulary learning; EFL language learners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbasi, M., & Hashemi, M. (2013). The impact/s of using mobile phone on English language vocabulary retention. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(3), 541-547.

Abdollahi-Guilani, M., Yasin, M., & Hua, T. K. (2011). Authenticity of Iranian English textbooks for schools. ELT Journal, 1(2), 25-30.

Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A., & Fooi, F. S. (2009). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communication technology. International journal of instruction, 2(1).

Akbulut, Y. (2008). Exploration of the attitudes of freshman foreign language students toward using computers at a Turkish State University. Online Submission, 7(1).

Bagheri, E., Roohani, A., & Ansari, D. N. (2012). Effect of CALL-based and non-CALL-based methods of teaching on L2 vocabulary learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 744.

Barani, G. (2013). The impact of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) on vocabulary achievement of Iranian university students EFL learners. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 2(5), 531-537.

Başöz, T., & Çubukçu, F. (2014). Pre-service EFL teacher's attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning (CALL). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 531-535.

Beatty, K. (2013). Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning: Routledge.

Boumová, V. (2008). Traditional vs. modern teaching methods: Advantages and disadvantages of each. Masarykova univerzita, Filozofická fakulta,

Çakmak, F., Namaziandost, E., & Kumar, T. (2021). CALL-enhanced L2 vocabulary learning: using spaced exposure through CALL to enhance L2 vocabulary retention. Education Research International, 2021, 1-8.

Carter, R. (1998). Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture.

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2014). Vocabulary and language teaching: Routledge.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2002). Teaching English as a second or

foreign language (3rd ed). U.S.A: Heinle & Heinle

Publishers.

Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Cambridge University Press.

Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.

Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy: Cambridge University Press.

De Bot, K., Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1997). Toward a lexical processing model for the study of second language vocabulary acquisition: Evidence from ESL reading. Studies in second language acquisition, 309-329.

Dilek, Y., & Yürük, N. (2013). Using semantic mapping technique in vocabulary teaching at pre-intermediate level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1531-1544.

Eizadpanah, J., Abedi, A., & Ghaedrahmat, M. (2014). Teaching vocabulary electronically: Does it work for Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 2(4), 16-28.

Ellis, N. C. (1995). The psychology of foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(2-3), 103-128.

Emami, A., & Amirghasemi, A. (2022). The Effect of CALL on the Vocabulary Learning of Iranian pre-intermediate EFL Learners. Applied Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 70-88.

Enayati, F., & Gilakjani, A. P. (2020). The Impact of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Improving Intermediate EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1), 96-112.

Freeman, J. (1991). The early development and education of highly able young children. European Journal of High Ability, 1(2), 165-171.

Ghorbani Ashin, Y., Gh, T., & Jahandar, B. (2015). The effectiveness of play therapy on reducing the symptoms of hyperactivity disorder and lack of attention in primary school children. Development of Jundishapur Education, 7, 58-53.

Goodfellow, R. (1994). Design principles for computer-aided vocabulary learning. Computers & Education, 23(1), 53-62.

Goodfellow, R. (1995). A review of the types of CALL programs for vocabulary instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(2-3), 205-226.

Gorjian, B., Moosavinia, S. R., Ebrahimi Kavari, K., Asgari, P., & Hydarei, A. (2011). The impact of asynchronous computer-assisted language learning approaches on English as a foreign language high and low achievers' vocabulary retention and recall. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 383-391.

Groot, P. J. (2000). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary acquisition.

Gündüz, N. (2005). Computer-assisted language learning. Journal of language and linguistic studies, 1(2), 193-214.

Hanafiah, W., Aswad, M., Sahib, H., Yassi, A. H., & Mousavi, M. S. (2022). The impact of CALL on vocabulary learning, speaking skill, and foreign language speaking anxiety: the case study of Indonesian EFL learners. Education Research International, 2022, 1-13.

Harley, B. (1996). Introduction: Vocabulary learning and teaching in a second language. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 3-12.

Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education: ERIC.

Hewer, S. (2007). CALL methodology: integrating CALL into study programs. Module 2.1. Information and communications technology for language teachers (ICT4LT). Slough, Thames Vally University. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www. ict4lt. org/en/en-mod2-1. htm.

Hirschel, R., & Fritz, E. (2013). Learning vocabulary: CALL program versus vocabulary notebook. System, 41(3), 639-653.

Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading.

Hosseini, S. A., Dabiri, A., Kashefian-Naeeini, S., & Mustapha, R. (2023). A comparison of the level of the ESP language learners’ performance and engagement in a synchronous online course and the face-to-face course. Paper presented at the Forum for Linguistic Studies.

Hoven, D. (1999). CALL-ing the learner into focus: Towards a learner-centred model for CALL. In: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Hubbard, P. H. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning. USA: Taylor & Francis Group.

Hulstijn, J. H. (1993). When do foreign-language readers look up the meaning of unfamiliar words? The influence of task and learner variables. The Modern Language Journal, 77(2), 139-147.

Jones, C. (1999). Contextualise & personalise: Key strategies for vocabulary acquisition. RECALL-HULL-, 11(3), 34-40.

Jordens, P., & Lalleman, J. (2010). Investigating second language acquisition (Vol. 12): Walter de Gruyter.

Kashefian-Naeeini, S., Hosseini, S. A., Dabiri, A., Rezaei, S., & Kustati, M. (2023). A comparison of the effects of web-based vocabulary instruction vs. the conventional method on EFL learners’ level of L2 lexical knowledge. Paper presented at the Forum for Linguistic Studies.

Kaya, T. (2006). The effectiveness of adaptive computer use for learning vocabulary: Northern Arizona University.

Khoshnoud, K., & Karbalaei, A. R. (2015). The effect of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) program on learning vocabulary among EFL left and right hemispheric dominant learners. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4(4), 761.

Kitajima, R. (2001). The effect of instructional conditions on students' vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34(5), 470-482.

Kung, S.-C., & Chuo, T.-W. (2002). Students’ perceptions of English learning through ESL/EFL websites. TESL-EJ, 6(1), 1-14.

Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading. Second language vocabulary acquisition, 20-34.

Laufer, B., & Shmueli, K. (1997). Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC journal, 28(1), 89-108.

Maftoon, P., Hamidi, H., & Sarem, S. N. (2015). The effects of CALL on vocabulary learning: A case of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 3(4), 19-30.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning: Cambridge university press.

Naraghizadeh, M., & Barimani, S. (2013). The effect of CALL on the vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 3(8), 1-12.

Nation, I. (1990). 1990: Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.

Nunan, D., & Carter, R. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages: Cambridge University Press.

Rahimi, M., & Yadollahi, S. (2011). Computer anxiety and ICT integration in English classes among Iranian EFL teachers. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 203-209.

Shokrpour, N., Mirshekari, Z., & Moslehi, S. (2019). Learning vocabulary electronically: does computer assisted language learning (CALL) instruction have any impacts on Iranian EFL learners? Cogent Education, 6(1), 1702827.

Son, J. (2001). CALL and vocabulary learning: A review. English Linguistic Science, 7, 27-35.

Tabar, H., & Khodareza, M. (2012). The effect of using multimedia on vocabulary learning of pre-intermediate and intermediate Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(12), 12879-12891.

Talarposhti, A., & Pourgharib, B. (2014). The possible effect of CALL on vocabulary acquisition and instruction. Journal of Language Sciences & Linguistics, 2(3), 79-84.

Teng, F. (2022). Vocabulary learning through videos: captions, advance-organizer strategy, and their combination. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(3), 518-550.

Teo, T. (2006). Attitudes toward computers: A study of post-secondary students in Singapore. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 17-24.

Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2003). Using mobile web and video phones in English language teaching: Projects with Japanese college students. Directions in CALL: Experience, experiments & evaluation, 207-224.

Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of computer-assisted learning, 21(3), 217-228.

Timuçin, M. (2006). Implementing CALL in an EFL context. ELT Journal, 60(3), 262-271.

Tozcu, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(5), 473-495.

Wang, X. (2006). Benefits and drawbacks of computer-assisted language teaching. Renmin University of China, 4.

Warschauer, M. (1998). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education: Routledge.

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.

Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 121-140.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i2.5556

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.