A Discourse Analysis on Workplace with Hymes 'Speaking Model' Between Owner and Staff In Puri Itoma Corporate kuta Lombok: A study on Ethnography of communication

Ramilia Laksmi Utari Umar, Yuni Budi Lestari, Lalu Muhaimi


Ethnography in general is communication in society. Ethnography of communication combines ethnography, description and structural and functional analysis of society and culture, and linguistics of cultural behavior that guides and helps share knowledge, art, morals, beliefs, and everything that people acquire as members of society. Communication Ethnography is an approach to understanding society and culture and reconstructing this ethnic group, especially society in general. Discourse is also very often used in communication in society, at work, offices, schools and public places, both formally and informally. Discourse in English is called discourse and is defined as expression in communicative interaction. Speech events are based on eight speech components. Hymes summarizes these components with the acronym SPEAKING. Ethnography of communication in this discussion refers to the use of language in certain community groups. A smile means, for example, eight components of speech: (1) Setting and scene, (2) Participants, (3) Ending, (4) Sequential action, (5) Key, (6) Instrument, (7) Interaction norms, and (8) Flow. This study shows that the main focus of workplace research is a professional workplace and the ability to express oneself calmly at work. However, as stated in this review article, there are several interesting studies regarding the topic of communication in workplace briefings, for example using relaxed language but still targeting different jobs and power or positions, different nationalities, even different cultures. but still respectful. with each other between the owner and sales marketing staff, as in the discussion above. Another potential growth area is the study of multilingual conversation patterns in the workplace and communication norms at press conferences. Recent research in this area explores the importance of ideology and effectiveness in multilingual communication in the workplace. The research clearly shows the importance of communication ethnography, namely the dense interaction of participants. High network density is essential. This research describes communication competence. each participant is considered to have expressed his opinion. All statements from the meeting created strong communication between the three members. At the same time, it can be assumed that the participants are owners and sellers who have long established close relations, even quite proper, relaxed, clear and concise cooperation. So, their level of cognition deserves thumbs up. Another important thing is to create clear communication in the office space. Another achievement is that Participant 2 is a sales marketer from Germany who is able to adapt to the work environment and belongs to a lower caste. But it shows the same thing as the relevant statement. However, external participants, despite coming from upper caste strata, gave conflicting statements. Even though people from different castes always try to fulfill their demands or desires in conversation.


Discourse Analysis; Speaking Models; Ethnography

Full Text:



Ackroyd, Stephen and Paul Thompson. (1999). Only joking? From subculture to counter-culture in organizational relations. In Stephen Ackroyd and Paul Thompson, eds., Organizational Misbehaviour. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 99–120. Angouri, Jo and Francesca BargielaChiappini. 2011. "So what problems bother you and you are not speeding up your work?" Problem- solving talk at work. Discourse & Communication, 5, 209–29.

Angouri, Jo and Meredith Marra. (2011). "OK one last thing for today then": constructing identities in corporate meeting talk.

Angouri, J., & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2011). 'So what problems bother you and you are not speeding up your work?'Problem solving talk at work. Discourse & Communication, 5(3), 209-229.

Angouri and Meredith Marra, eds., Constructing Identity at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–16. Angouri, Jo, Meredith Marra, and Janet Holmes. 2012. Negotiating group norms in the urban workplace. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics Symposium, Berlin.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2017). A. Method of the Study. In A Cohesion and Coherence On Students' exposition Writing (p. 39).

Gonzales, P. (1994). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 8) edited by Paul Drew and John Heritage. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 580 pp. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 5(1).

Holmes, J. (2015). Discourse in the workplace. The handbook of discourse analysis, 880-901.

Romano, N. C., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2001, January). Meeting analysis: Findings from research and practice. In Proceedings of the 34th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 13-pp). IEEE.

Ray, M., Biswas, C., & Bengal, W. (2011). A study on Ethnography of communication: A discourse analysis with Hymes 'speaking model'. Journal of Education and Practice, 2(6), 33-40.

Stubbe, M., Lane, C., Hilder, J., Vine, E., Vine, B., Marra, M., ... & Weatherall, A. (2003). Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction. Discourse studies, 5(3), 351-388.

Sarangi, S., & Roberts, C. (1999). The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work- related settings. Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, 1, 1-57.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2011). Conceptualising 'the relational'in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im) politeness comments. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3565-3578.

Streeck, J. (1980). Speech acts in interaction: A critique of Searle. Discourse processes, 3(2), 133- 153.

Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press.

Umezinwa, J. E. N. N. I. F. E. R. (2019). Analysis of a selected bargain discourse using Dell Hymes' SPEAKING model.

Wedeen, L. (2009). Ethnography as interpretive enterprise. Political ethnography: What immersion contributes to the study of power, 1, 75-94.

Zhou, Y., & Creswell, J. W. (2012). The use of mixed methods by Chinese scholars in East China: A case study. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(1), 73-87.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i3.5551


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.