The Urgency of Establishing an Environmental Court in Resolving Environmental Cases in Indonesia
Abstract
Environmental cases that have been processed in court, in their decisions are not in favour of the environment, are not oriented towards environmental sustainability and are considered often disappointing and do not provide a sense of justice for the community and justice for the environment itself. With this situation, it is very urgent for the Environmental Court to resolve environmental cases that are oriented towards environmental sustainability. The purpose of the research is to describe the urgency of the existence of an environmental court. This research is studied using normative legal studies, qualitative research specifications, secondary data sources and using qualitative data analysis. Environmental cases have special characteristics. The characteristics of environmental cases are often scientific and require special expertise in handling, so it is urgent to establish a special environmental court. Environmental cases resolved in the general court have not been able to provide ecological justice and have actually resulted in acquittals for the perpetrators. for the perpetrators, it is very urgent to have an environmental court.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books
A. Sonny Keraf, 2010, Etika Lingkungan Hidup, Jakarta: Kompas;
Asdak, Chay, 2012, Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategi: Jalan Menuju Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press;
Basah Sjachran, 1989, Eksistensi dan Tolok Ukur Badan Peradilan Adminstrasi di Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni;
Beni Ahmad Saebani, Afifuddin, 2009, Metodologi Peneltian Kualitatif, Bandung: Penebit CV. Puataka Setia.
Lawrence M Friedman, 1975, The Legal System A Social Science Perspective, Russel Sage Foundation, New York.
FX. Adji Samekto, Suteki, Ani Purwanti, 2015, Membangun Politik Hukum Sumber Daya alam Berbasis Cita Hukum Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Thafa Media;.
Gunawan Widjaya, 2005, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Karni, 1952, Acara Pidana Berpedoman HIR, Jakarta: Pustaka Islam;.
Lexy J Moleong, 2010, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya; Mahrus Ali & Ayu Izza Elvany, 2014, Hukum Pidana Lingkungan, Yogyakarta: UII Pres; Milovanovic, Dragan, 1994, A Premiere in the Sociology of Law, New York: Harrow and Heston Publisher;.
Marhaeni Ria Siombo, 2012, Hukum Lingkungan & Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Gramedia;.
Poerwadarminta, W.J.S, 1966, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, P.N. Balaipustaka;
Prayekti Murharjanti, dkk, 2009, Menuju Peradilan Pro Lingkungan, Indonesia Center for Environmental (ICEL);
Rahardjo, Satjipto, 1980, Hukum dan Masyarakat, Bandung: Alumni;. , 1996, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti;.,1983, Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, Bandung: Alumni; Rochmani, 2018, Hukum Lingkungan dan Penegakan Hukum, Semarang: Pustaka;.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1985, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan ke dua, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia;.
Roscoe Pound, Contemporary Jurisdic Theory, dalam D. Llyod, 1965, Introduction to Jurisprudence, London: Stecens;
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2009, Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing;
Siti Sundari Rangkuti, 2005, Hukum Lingkungan dan Kebijaksanaan Lingkungan Nasional,
Surabaya: Airlangga University Press;.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia-Press. Sudharto P. Hadi, 2010, Resolusi Konflik Lingkungan, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro;, 2009, Manusia & Lingkungan, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro;.
, 2005, Dimensi Lingkungan Perencanaan Pembangunan, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University;.
Takdir Rahmadi, 2011, Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo; Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 1960, Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, Sumur Bandung; Prayekti Muharjanti dkk, 2009, Menuju Peradilan Pro-Lingkungan, ICEL, Jakarta.
Journal
Absori, 2005, “Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan pada Era Reformasi”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 8, No 2;.
Cut Era Fitriyeni, 2010, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Pengadilan (The Environmental Dispute Settlement Through Ligitation)”, KANUN No. 52 Edisi Desember;.
Effendi, Aan, 2013, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Melalui Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara”, Jurnal Perspektif, Vol.XVIII, No. 1, Januari;.
Handri Wirastuti Sawitri dan Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, 2010, “Sengketa Lingkungan Dan.
Penyelesaiannya”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 10 No. 2 Mei;.
Nigel P Mellville dan Rossa, Stephen M, 2010, “Infomation Systrem Innovation For Environmental Sustainability”, School of Bussiness University of Michigan, 701 Tappen Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109 MIS QuarterlyVol. 34 No.1 pp.1-21/March, U.S.A;.
Ridho Kurniawan dan Siti Nurul Intan Sari D, 2014, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Berdasarkan Asas Strict Liability (Studi Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Hidup)”, Jurnal Yuridis, Vol.1 No.2, Desember, ISSN 1693448;.
Yeni Widowaty, 2012, “Konsep Sustainable Development Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup”, Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol. 19 No. 2.
Regulations
Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945.
UU no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Powe.
UU no. 49 of 2009 concerning General Courts.
UU no. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i2.5468
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.