The Impact of Google Translate Syntactic Strategies on Translation Quality: Translating Journal Articles from Indonesian to English

Muhammad Yamany MZ

Abstract


The prevalent use of Google Translate as a tool for academic translations, despite concerns regarding its quality, frames the core issue of this research. This research aims to classify syntactic strategies used by Google Translate in translating from Indonesia to English. It also aims to analyze the quality of the translation produced and how the syntactic strategies affected the translation quality. The data were collected from a journal article entitled “Pengaruh Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris sebagai Bahasa Pengantar dalam Pendidikan Formal” which was presented using a descriptive qualitative method. The findings of this research reveal there are several types of different syntactic strategies used by Google Translate. The result of this research shows that, out of 273 data collected, there are 123 (45.05%) data of literal translation, 2 (0.73%) data of loan and calque, 53 (19.41%) of transposition, 17 (6.23%) data of unit shift, 45 (16.48%) data of phrase structure change, 1 (0.37%) data of clause structure change, 18 (6.59%) data of sentence structure change, 1 (0.37%) data of cohesion change, 13 (4.76%) data of level shift, and no data found for scheme change. In addition, there are several different classifications found for translation quality. Out of 194 data analyzed, the results show that 163 (84.02%) data are accurate, 30 (15.46%) data are less accurate, and 1 (0.52%) data is not accurate. For acceptability, there are 179 (92.27%) acceptable, 14 (7.22%) data are less accurate, and 2 (1.03%) data are not acceptable. Finally, there are 180 (92.78%) data with high readability, 15 (7.73%) data are medium readability, and no data found for low readability.

 


Keywords


Google Translate, Syntactic Strategies, Translation Quality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Argondizzo, P. (2022, June 1). How accurate is Google Translate in 2019? Argo Translation. Retrieved November 5, 2022, from https://www.argotrans.com/blog/accurate-google-translate-2019

Babbie, E. (2008). The Basics of Social Research. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Catford, J. C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation. Walton Street: Oxford University Press.

Chesterman, A. (2016). Memes of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nida, Eugene A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Nababan, M.R. (2003). Teori Menerjemah Bahasa Inggris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Riyantika, D. (2019). Pengaruh Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris sebagai Bahasa Pengantar dalam Pendidikan Formal. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University

Wikimedia Foundation. (2022, November 3). Google Translate. Wikipedia. Retrieved November 5, 2022, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Translate




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i10.5173

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.