Social Accountability Process of Islamic Boarding School: Case Study of Sidogiri Pasuruan Islamic Boarding School

Desak Tiara Wirawan


This research aims to know the process of social aspects influenced the importance of accountability in an organization of Islamic religious education that is don't give priority to profits in its operational activities, in Indonesia is often referred to as boarding schools. In order to further deepen the social accountability of the process, then the researchers used a qualitative research method with approach case studies boarding school Sidogiri Pasuruan. As for the analysis tools used are interactive analysis. As noted, there are more and more accountability role played in ancient civilizations and pre-modern societies. Therefore, at this time, the case for tracing the genealogy of accountability as a follow up said is best seen as a presumption that requires further examination. One of them is about the accountability of boarding schools which is rich in religious values and culture as a form of the spread of Islam. The dynamic life of boarding schools has been proven with the involvement of active participation in providing service to the community and many aspects of life that always accompany it. Interestingly, in terms of financial resources, the pesantren depends not only on the parents of the students, but also other sources of funding. The existence of this mandate, then boarding schools are definitely required to conduct financial accountability. These principles are very in line with the principles of Islamic law. It is closely related to surat Al-Baqarah verse 282 and 283 goals for the benefit of the people, i.e. If there is a transaction then write so that measurements obtained in a fair manner, not preferential treatment and is not reduced (ash-Syu'ara v. 181-184). Can be said to forbid these forms of transactions contrary to the Shariah.


Accountability, Islamic Boarding School, A Social Process

Full Text:



Adhi, A, S. & Erningpraja. 2010. Menyentuh Hati, Menyapa Tuhan. Jakarta: Alex Media Komputindo.

Adnan, Muhammad Akhyar. 1996. An Investigation of Accounting Concepts and Practices in Islamic Bank. Disertasi Doktor (tidak dipublikasikan).

Adnan, Muhammad Akhyar. 1997. The Shari’ah, Islamic Bank and Accounting Concept. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia [JAAI], vol. 1 No. 1 Mei hal. 47-80,Yogyakarta: UII.

Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya. 2008. Departemen Agama RI. Bandung: Diponegoro.

Anthony, R.N., & Govindarajan, V. 2005. Management Control System. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Bovens, Mark. Schillemans T. & Hart. 2008. Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool. Public Administration 86, no.1: 225­242.

Choudhury MA. 1986. Contribution to Islamic economic theory. Hong Kong: The Macmillan press Ltd.

Corbett, D. 1996. Australian Public Sector Management. 2nd eds. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

Creswell. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Denhart, K. 1991. People and Puspose in a Fuzzy World. Direction in Government, pp. 28-30.

Depdiknas. 2003. Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Dykstra, Clarence A. 1939. The Quest for Responsibility. American Political Science Review. 33 (1): 1–25.

Dubnick, Melvin. 1998. Clarifying Accountability: An Ethical Theory Framework. Dalam Charles Sampford, Noel Preston and C. A. Bois. Public Sector Ethics: Finding And Implementing Values. Leichhardt, NSW, Australia: The Federation Press/Routledge. pp. 68-8l.

Ezzamel, Mahmoud. 1997. Accounting, Control and Accountability: Preliminary Evidence from Ancient Egypt. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 8 (6): 563–601. Doi: 10.1006/ cpac.1997.0123.

Finer, H. 1941. Administrative Responsibility and Democratic Government. Public Administration Review 1, 335-350.

Friedrich, C.J. 1940. Public Policy and The Nature of Administrative Responsibility. In C.J. Friedrich and E.S. Mason (eds.), Public Policy, pp. 3-4. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gallhofer S, Haslam J. 2004. Accounting and liberation theology: some insights for the project of emancipatory accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal; 17(3):382–407.

Gambling T, Karim RA. 1991. Business and accounting ethics in Islam. London: Mansell Publishing Limited.

Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Problematika Utama in Teori Sosial; Aksi, Struktur, dan Kontradiksi dalam Analisis Sosial. Terjemahan oleh Dariyatno. 2009. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Pelajar.

Giddens, Anthony. 1984. Teori Strukturasi Dasar-Dasar Pembentukan Struktur Sosial Masyarakat. Terjemahan oleh Maufur dan Daryanto. 2010. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Giddens, Anthony. 1993. Metode Sosiologi Kaidah-Kaidah Baru. Terjemahan oleh Eka Adi Nugraha dan Wahmuji. 2010. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Grant, Ruth W. & Keohane, Robert O. (2005). Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29-43.

Greiner, N. 1990. Accountability In Government Organisations. In Guthrie, J., Parker, L & Shand, D. (eds.), The Public Sector: Contemporary Readings In Accounting and Auditing, Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Haniffa, R. and Hudaib, M. 2002. A theoretical framework for the development of the Islamic perspective of accounting. Accounting, Commerce and Finance: The Islamic Perspective Journal, Vol. 6 Nos 1/2, pp. 1-71.

Harmon, M.M. dan Mayer, R.T. 1986. Organization Theory for Public Administration. Boston: Little, Brown.

Hart, H.L.A. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hayashi, T. 1989. On Islamic Accounting: Its Future Impact on Western Accounting. The Institute of Middle Eastern Studies, International University of Japan, Minami Uonuma.

Hind D. 2007. The threat to reason: how the enlightenment was hijacked and how we can reclaim it. London: VERSO.

Ilyas, Y. 1999. Kuliah Akhlaq. Penerbit LPPI UMY. Yogyakarta.

Jones, G.W. 1992. The Search for Local Accountability. Strengthening local government in the 1990s. In S. Leach (ed), pp/ 49-78. London: Longman.

Kamla R, Gallhofer S, Haslam J. 2006. Islam, nature and accounting: Islamic principles and the notion of accounting for the environment. Accounting Forum; 30 (3): 245–65.

Kamla, R. 2009. Critical insights into contemporary Islamic accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 20 No. 8, pp. 921-32.

Lucas, J.R. 1993. Responsibility. Oxford: Claredon Press.

Mardiasmo. 2009. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Mulgan, Richard. 2000. Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept?. Public Administration. 78 (3): 555–573.

Nawawi, Hadari. 2003. Kepemimpinan Mengefektifkan Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Nuraini dan Indudewi, D. 2010. Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Pengendalian Akuntansi, dan Sistem Pelaporan terhadap Akuntabillitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Kabupaten Brebes. SIJALU ISSN 1412-5331 Vol.11 No.4.

Plescia, Joseph. 2001. Judicial Accountability and Immunity in Roman Law. American Journal of Legal History. The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 45, No. 1: 51–70. doi: 10. 2307/ 3185349. JSTOR 3185349.

Roberts, Jennifer T. 1982. Accountability in Athenian Government. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Ruslan, Rosady. 2008. Manajemen Public Relatoins & Media Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Samudji, A. 2010. Psikologi Sosial. Malang: Jenggala Pustaka Utama.

Schedler, Andreas. 1999. Conceptualizing Accountability. In Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New

Seidman, Gary I. 2005. The Origins of Accountability: Everything I Know About the Sovereign's Immunity, I Learned from King Henry III. St. Louis University Law Journal. 49(2): 393–480.

Simanjuntak, Dahnil Azar; Yeni Januarsi. 2011. Akuntabilitas dan Pengelolaan Keuangan di Masjid. Dalam Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIV Aceh 2011.

Sinclair, Amanda 1995. The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 20 (2/3): 219–237.

Soemardjan, Selo. 1964. Setangkai Bunga Sosial. Jakarta: Yayasan Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syahatah, Husein. 2001. Usul al-Fikr al-Muhasab al-Islami. Terjemahan. Jakarta: Akbar Media Sarana.

Triyuwono, Iwan. 2000. Organisasi dan Akuntansi Syari’ah, Yogyakarta: LkiS

Triyuwono, Iwan. 2006a. Akuntansi Syari’ah: Menuju Puncak Kesadaran Ketuhanan ”Manunggaling Kawulo-Gusti”. Pidato pengukuhan Guru Besar Akuntansi Syaria’ah Universitas Brawijaya. Malang 2 September 2006.

Triyuwono, Iwan dan As’udi. 2001. Akuntansi Syari’ah Memformulasikan Konsep Laba dalam Konteks Metafora Amanah. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf. Jakarta.

Urch, Edwin J. 1929. The Law Code of Hammurabi. American Bar Association Journal. 15 (7): 437–441.

Walzer, Michael. 1994. The Legal Codes of Ancient Israel. In Ian Shapiro. the Rule of Law. NY: New York University Press. pp. 101–119.

Wilson R. 1997. Economics, ethics and religion. Macmilan Press Ltd.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.