The Role of Stakeholders in 21st Century Competency-Based Authentic Assessment Management at SMK Center of Excellence

M Nurudin, Toto Suharto, Imam Makruf

Abstract


Stakeholder participation in authentic assessment management in center of excellence schools. This study aims to describe the participation of stakeholders in planning, implementing, and controlling/supervising authentic 21st century competency-based assessments (AABKA-21) at SMK Muhammadiyang 1 North Klaten. This research uses a qualitative approach, a type of case study, with a case design. Data collection techniques use in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis. The validity check of data is carried out through credibility criteria, transferability criteria, dependability criteria, and confirmability criteria. The collected data was analyzed using Milles Huberman cycle analysis, starting from data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and verification and conclusions. The results showed the participation of stakeholders at SMK Muhammadiyah 1 North Klaten in planning and implementation, and supervision reached level three (representative participation) to level four (transformative participation).


Keywords


Participation; Stakeholder Management; Assessment; Authentic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adawiyah, S. H. R. (2018). Kesulitan Guru Dalam Mengimplementasikan. 10(2), 131–152.

Amua-Sekyi, E. T. (2016). Assessment, Student Learning and Classroom Practice: A Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 1–6.

Arends, R. I., & Kilcher, A. (2010). Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. In Teaching for Student Learning: Becoming an Accomplished Teacher. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203866771

Barokah, M. (2019). Manajemen penilaian sumatif pada ranah kognitif pembelajaran PAI kelas X semester ganjil di SMA Negri 2 Pontianak tahun pelajaran 2017/ 2018. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 9(2), 159–179.

Bostock, S. (2000). Student peer assessment Stephen Bostock. Studies in Higher Education, 1–4.

Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (2005). Leading the self-managing school. Leading the Self-Managing School, Lmi, 1–232. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203982983

Chang, Y., Eklund, T., Kantola, J. I., & Vanharanta, H. (2009). International creative tension study of university students in South Korea and Finland. Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, 19(6), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20182

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9

Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind. In Learning.

Hadi, S., Ismara, K. I., & Tanumihardja, E. (2015). Pengembangan Sistem Tes Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Kompetensi Dasar Kejuruan Siswa Smk. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i2.5577

Harden, R. M. (2002). Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: Is there a difference? Medical Teacher, 24(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159022020687

Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP): implementasi asesmen autentik di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063

Marin-Garcia, J. A., Pérez-Peñalver, M. J., & Watts, F. (2013). How to assess innovation competence in services: The case of university students. Direccion y Organizacion, 50(April 2014), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.37610/dyo.v0i50.431

Mueller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox : Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development. Merlot Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 1(1), 7.

Mulder, M. (2012). Competence-based Education and Training. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 18(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2012.670048

Ningsih, N., Soetjipto, B., & Sumarmi, S. (2017). Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar IPS melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Round Table dan Rally Coach. Jurnal Pendidikan - Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(5), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i5.9167

Nisrokha. (2018). AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT (PENILAIAN OTENTIK) Nisrokha 1. 8, 209–229.

Permata, J. I., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Hindarto, N. (2017). Analisis Representasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Kreativitas dalam Pembelajaran Cps dengan Asesmen Diagnostik. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 233–241.

Ponte, M., Klemperer, E., Sahay, A., & Chren, M. M. (2009). Effects of vulvodynia on quality of life. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 60(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.032

Postareff, L., Mattsson, M., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Hailikari, T. (2017). The complex relationship between emotions, approaches to learning, study success and study progress during the transition to university. Higher Education, 73(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0096-7

Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setianingsih, W., & Setyawarno, D. (2020). Pelatihan Implementasi Assessment Of Learning, Assessment For Learning Dan Assessment As Learning Pada Pembelajaran IPA SMP di MGMP Kabupaten Magelang. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA Dan Pendidikan MIPA, 4(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpmmp.v4i1.34080

Rosnaeni, R. (2021). Karakteristik dan Asesmen Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 4341–4350. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1548

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Sturing, L., Biemans, H. J. a, Mulder, M., & Bruijn, E. De. (2010). To What Extent are Vocational Courses Competence-Based ?: Evaluation of a Model for Self-Assessing Competence-Based Vocational Education. Ecer.

Suarta, I. M., Hardika, N. S., & I Gusti Ngurah Sanjaya, & I. W. B. A. (2015). Model Authentic Self-Assessment da.lam Pengembangan Eployability Skills Mahasiswa Pendidikan Tinggi Vokasi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1).

Suastra, I. W., & Ristiati, P. (2016). Permasalahan Guru Dalam Merancang Dan Pembelajaran Sains Di Smp Dan Sma. 1992.

Syuhud. (2019). SEKOLAH UNGGULAN TUNTUTAN PENDIDIKAN GLOBAL. Bidayatuna.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills_ Learning for Life in Our Times -. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 243.

White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452961000157564

Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1, 263–278.

Yeravdekar, S., & Behl, A. (2017). Benchmarking model for management education in India: A total interpretive structural modeling approach. Benchmarking, 24(3), 666–693. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2016-0082

Zaroni, A. N. (2015). Globalisasi Ekonomi Dan Implikasinya Bagi Negara-Negara Berkembang : Telaah Pendekatan Ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam |, 1(1), 36–54.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i8.4957

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.