Code Mixing of Supervisors’ Oral Feedback on Students’ Thesis Writing
Abstract
This study aims to obtain research answer of the use of code mixing in the supervisors’ spoken language in providing oral feedback during thesis guidance. The research used is qualitative with phenomenological method, which describes the meaning of the experience of a phenomenon from several individuals with a focus on the description of what is experienced. Data in the form of recordings transcripts of five supervisors with students at the time of giving oral feedback in thesis writing and interviews in the form of words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and language units above sentences. Then, the researcher found the type of code mixing of outer code mixing by absorbing foreign language elements, that is English insertion of words, phrases, sentences, and fragments. Based on the findings of this study, several implications were put forward, such as being able to increase knowledge about the form of code mixing, adding English knowledge and being able to create scientific references in language regarding the use of code-mixing. In addition, the results of this study can provide additional knowledge that code-mixing can also be used in guiding thesis writing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Strauss and J. Corbin, (1990). Busir, Qualitative Research; Grounded Theory Procedure and Techniques. London: Sage Publikation
Buckingham, L., & Aktug-Ekinci, D. (2017). Interpreting Coded Feedback on Writing: Turkish EFL Students’ Approaches to Revision. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.01.001
Booth-Butterfield, M. (1989). The interpretation of classroom performance feedback: An attributional approach. Communication Education, 38(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528909378745
Creswell. J. W. (2007). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Edisi 4. Dikutip oleh Sugiyono (2016) dalam buku yang berjudul “Cara Mudah Menyusun: Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi”. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Creswell, John W. 2012. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
DeFranzo, Susan E. (2018). 5 Reasons Why Feedback is Important. Retrieved from https://www.snapsurveys.com/blog/5-reasons-feedback-important/ retrieved from 12.54, 21/08/2018.
Dwi Megista Putri, Dian Christina, Shally Amna. (2022). Analysis of Sentence Fragments In Students’ Academic Writing Task of English Department. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022. ISSN: 2614-6754 (print), ISSN: 2614-3097(online)
Fishman, J.A. (1965). Bilingualism, intelligence and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 49(4), 227-37. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1965.tb00862.x
Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies (No. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Hanafiah, Ridwan, Ayu Rantika, Muhammad Yusuf. (2018). The Levels of English-Arabic Code-Mixing in Islamic Boarding School Students’ Daily Conversation. Advances in Language and Literary Studies ISSN: 2203-4714.
Hattie, John and Helen Timperley. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research March 2007, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 81-112.
Hymes, DelL (1974). Foundation in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Press.
Irmayani, Musfeptial, Hari Purwiati. (2005). Alih Kode Dan Campur Kode Dalam Buletin Salam. Balai Bahasa Provinsi Kalimantan Barat.
Marjohan, A. (1995). Sejarah singkat linguistik. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung.
McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion. DOI: 10.1177/0267659114559116
Moleong, L. J. (2011:6). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya.
Mulyana, Deddy. (2005). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Remaja. Rosdakarya.
Oshima, Alice and Ann Hogue. (2006). Writing Academic English, Longman: Pearson.
Ramzan, Muhammad, Aamir Aziz, Maimoona Ghaffar. (2021). A study of code-mixing and code-switching (Urdu and Punjabi) in children’s early speech. ISSN: 1305-578X Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 869-881; 2021. Cognizance Research Associates - Published by JLLS.
Siregar, B.U. (1996). Code alternation in bilingual speech behaviour. Medan: USU Press.
Sofaer, S. (1999). Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?. Health Services Research 34:4 Part II (December 1999).
Sridhar, S. N., & Sridhar, K. K. (1980). The syntax and psycholinguistics of bilingual code mixing. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 34(4), 407-416. dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0081105
Suwito. (1985). Pengantar Awal Sosiolinguistik: Teori dan Problema. Surakarta: Henry Offset.
Van Herk, G. (2012). What is Sociolinguistics. USA: Wily- Blackwell.
Wang, Ruo Jiang (王若江). (2005). Hanyu Zhengyin Jiaocheng 汉语正音教程. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Wardhaugh, R. (1998). An introduction to sociolinguistics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i7.4875
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.