Problematics of Property Companies Experiencing Bankruptcy

Heru Sugiyono

Abstract


Suppose a property company is incapable of repaying its creditors' debts after being declared bankrupt by the court; all of the debtor's assets will be utilized to settle its outstanding debts. The assets of the debtor will be included in the bankruptcy estate. Naturally, this will give rise to its own set of issues when a house that has been purchased and fully paid for is also included in the bankrupt estate. The purpose of this research is to explore the legal safeguards available to consumers when a property company goes bankrupt and determine the responsibilities of the company if a consumer's purchased and paid-for house becomes part of the bankruptcy proceedings. The author employs a normative juridical research method, primarily relying on literature reviews as the primary research source. The findings of the study indicate that consumer protection resulting from the bankruptcy of a property company entails entitlement to compensation, reimbursement, and/or restitution. However, to exercise these rights, consumers must initiate legal proceedings by filing a claim through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) or by pursuing default lawsuits in court. The Government also proposes to prevent a company from becoming bankrupt by conciliating. As for the responsibility of the property company to consumers, if the house that has been purchased and paid for is declared bankrupt, it has good faith to remove the house that has been purchased and paid for by the consumer from a bankrupt bank.


Keywords


Problematics; Property Company; Bankrupt.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antasari, Rina., & Fauziah, Is, Muhamad Said. (ed.), Hukum Bisnis, Setara Press, Malang, 2018, 176.

Apeldoorn, M.J. van., Inleiding tot de Studie vana het Nederlandse Recht), Terjemahan oleh Oetarid Sadino, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1999, 477, hlm 222.

Ardiyos, Kamus Standar Akuntansi, Citra Harta Prima, Jakarta, 2013, 650.

Arjaya, Bendesa Gede Mas Indriyanigraha.; & Ariawan, I Gusti Ketut., Penetapan Boedel Pailit dan Pengeluaran Benda dari Boedel Pailit: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Nomor: 5/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-lain/2017/PN. Niaga Sby Jo. Nomor 2/Pdt. Sus. Pailit/2017/ PN. Niaga Sby., Kertha Semaya: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol 2, No.1, 2014, 15.

Business-law.binus.ac.id, Erni Herawati (ed.), Kreditur Preferen dalam KUH Perdata, diakses pada 2018, https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/12/19/kreditur-preferen-dalam-kuh-perdata/#:~:text=Secara%20umum%20dapat%20dijelaskan%20bahwa,yang%20memegang%20hak%20jaminan%20kebendaan.

Chomzah, Ali Achmad., Seri Hukum Pertanahan III: Penyelesaian Sengekta Hak atas Tanah dan Seri Pertanahan IV: Pengadaan Tanah Instansi Pemerintah, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta, 2003.

cnbcindonesia.com, Rahajeng Kusumo Hastuti (ed.), Kasus Pailit Properti Marak, Pengembang dan Konsumen Rugi, diakses pada 21 September 2020, https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20200921081220-37-188113/kasus-pailit-properti-marak-pengembang-konsumen-rugi.

Collins, Hugh., Good Faith in European Contract Law, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 14, No.2, 1994, 229-254, https://www.jstor.org/stable/764619.

Daliyo, J.B. (eds.), Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Prehalindo, Jakarta, 2001, 266.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi Keempat, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2013, 1701.

Djamali, R. Abdoel., Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2013, 240.

Garner, Bryan., Black’s Law, 8th Edition, West Publishing Company, USA, 2004, 5426.

Graham, Nicole., Landscape: Property, Environment, Law, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2011, 223.

H.S., Salim., Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2015, 189.

Hadi, Waluyo. & Hastuti, Dini., Kamus Terbaru Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Reality Publisher, Surabaya, 2011, 608.

Harahap, M. Yahya., & Tarmizi (ed.), Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2019, 600.

Harjono, Dhaniswara K., Hukum Properti, Pusat Pengembangan Hukum dan Bisnis Indonesia, Jakarta, 2016, 498.

Hartanto, Heri., Perlindungan Hak Konsumen terhadap Pelaku Usaha yang dinyatakan Pailit, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, Vol. 2, No.2, 2016, 315-328, https://jhaper.org/index.php/JHAPER/article/view/38/45#.

Howells, Geraint.; Ramsay, Iain.; Wilhelmsson, Thomas.; & Kraft, David., Handbook of Research on International Consumer Law, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, USA, 602, doi: 10.4337/9781849806312.

Illona, & Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri., Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen dalam Hal Pelaku Usaha Pengembang Rumah Susun yang sudah dinyatakan Pailit: Studi terhadap Kemanggisan Residence), Jurnal Hukum Adigama, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018, 25, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2202.

Kansil, C.S.T., & Kansil, Christine S.T., Pokok-pokok Pengetahuan Hukum Dagang, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2013, 554.

Keane, Adrian., & McKeown, Paul., The Modern Law of Evidence, 10th Edition, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2014, 709.

Maynes, E. Scott., Consumer Protection: The Issues, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 3, No.2, 1979, 97-109, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02278743.

Meliala, Djaja S., Hukum Perdata dalam Perspektif BW, Edisi Revisi, Nuansa Aulia, Bandung, 2014, 308.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno., Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2005, 189.

Miru, Ahmadi., Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2014, 167.

Morgan, Edmund M., The Law of Evidence, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 59, No.4, 1946, 481-576, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1335212.

Muris, Timothy J., The Interface of Competition and Consumer Protection, The Fordham Corporate Law Institute’s Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy, New York City, 2002, 30, https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_statements/interface-competition-and-consumer-protection/021031fordham.pdf.

Panasea, I Komang Ari Buana Nusantara.; & Sukihana, Ida Ayu.; Pengaturan Kedudukan Konsumen sebagai Kreditor dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan, Jurnal Kertha Wicana, Vol. 9, No.8, 2020, 1-12, https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/62050.

Patel, Ameeta., & Reincsh, Lamar., Companies Can Apologize Corporate Apologies and Legal Liability, Business Communication Quarterly, Vol.66, No.1, 2003, 9-25, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F108056990306600103.

Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 21/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst, (2020).

Richards, Janet Leach., A Guide to Spousal Support and Property Division Claims Under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 41, No.2, Symposium on Bankruptcy Law, 2007, 227-248, https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/25740609.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Amandemen ke-4. (Konstitusi RI).

Republik Indoenesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pelrindungan Konsumen

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.

Republik Indonesia, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Perkara Nomor 67/PUU-XI/2013.

Republik Indoensia, Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Nomor:350/MPP/Kep/12/2001 Tentang Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen.

Rose, Carol M., Crystals a Mud in Property Law, Standford Law Review, Vol. 40, No.3, 1998, 577-610, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228813.

Rosmawati, Pokok-pokok Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2018, 127.

Santoso, Budi., Provit Berlipat: Investasi Tanah dan Rumah (Panduan Investasi yang tak Pernah Mati), Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Kelima, Alex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.

Saputri, Elsa Melinda.; Waspiah, & Arifin, Ridwan., Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen dalam Hal Pengembang (Developer) Apartemen dinyatakan Pailit, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, Vol.2, No.2, 154-161, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229337906.pdf.

Sari, Elsi Kartika., & Simanunsong, Advendi., Hukum dalam Ekonomi, Edisi Kedua, Grasindo, Jakarta, 2017, 217.

Setiantoro, Arfian.; Putri, Fayreizha Destika.; Novitarani, Anisah.; & Njatrijani, Rinitami., Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen dan Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce di Era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN, Jurnal RechtVinding, Vol. 7, No.1, 2018, 1-17, https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/220/175.

Setiawan, I Ketut Oka., Hukum Perikatan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016, 216.

Shapo, Marshall S., A Representational Theory of Consumer Protection: Doctrine, Function, and Legal Liability for Product Disappointment, Virginia Law Review, Vol.60, No.7, 1974, 1109-1388, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1072403.

Siahaan, N.H.T., Hukum Konsumen: Perlindungan Konsumen dan Tanggung Jawab Produk, Panta Rei, Jakarta, 2005, 320.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy., Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami UU No.37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Kewajiban Penundaan Pembayaran Utang, Edisi Kedua, Kencana Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2016, 630.

Subekti, Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata, Intermasa, Jakarta, 2011. 244.

Sudarsono, Kamus Hukum, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2015, 620.

Summers, R.S.; McRoberts, W.G.; & Goodhart, A.L., The Conceptualization of Good Faith in American Contract Law, Law and Philosophy Library, 2000, 299–319, doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9407-313.

Summers, Robert S., “Good Faith” in General Contract Law and the Sales Provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 54, No.2, 1968, 195-267, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1071744.

Sutedi, Adrian., Akhria (ed.), Tanggung Jawab Produk dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2008, 326.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i8.4857

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.