Creditor Rights on Rejection of Execution Request for Guarantee Rights by State and Auction Private

Retno Putri Wijayanti, Burhanudin Harahap

Abstract


Creditors' Rights Against Rejection of Requests for Guarantee Execution of Underwriting Rights by the Office of State Assets and Auction Services (KPKNL) in Surakarta. Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta. Credit agreement with Underwriting Rights guarantee, the creditor of the Underwriting Right has the right to precede other creditor (droit de preference) to take repayment from the sale of the object. The purpose of writing is to find out the cause of the State Property and Auction Service Office (KPKNL) to reject the application for guarantee execution for Underwriting Rights and the solution to the obstacles faced by creditors in the guarantee execution process for Underwriting Rights that are rejected by the State Property and Auction Service Office (KPKNL). Research Methods using empirical legal approaches.  Results of the study (1) The cause of the State Property and Auction Service Office (KPKNL) rejects the request for execution of collateral for Underwriting Rights The execution of guarantees, especially Underwriting Rights in this case cannot proceed smoothly. One of them is the rejected request for execution of Mortgage Rights by the Office of State Assets and Auction Services (KPKNL). Head of KPKNL or Class II Auction Officer in the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 27 / PMK.06 / 2016. The solution so that the creditor can obtain his rights for the guarantee execution of Underwriting Right in Article 20 (2) the Dependents Rights Act with the agreement of the giver and the Underwriting Right holder, the sale of the Underwriting Right object can be carried out under the hand if it can thus be obtained the price highest that benefits all parties.

Keywords


Creditors' Right; Application for Execution; Guarantee for Underwriting Rights

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bahsan, M. (2007). Indonesian Banking Credit Guarantee and Guarantee Law. Jakarta: PT. Rajawali Press.

Explanation of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 1996 concerning Underwriting Rights to Land and Objects Related to Land, Number 7

Fuadi, M. (2013). Debt Guarantee Law, Erlangga

George, T. E. (2006). An empirical study of empirical legal scholarship: the top law schools. Ind. LJ, 81, 141.

Goldsmith, J., & Vermeule, A. (2002). Empirical methodology and legal scholarship. The University of Chicago Law Review, 69(1), 153-167.

Interview with Ms. Anna Kamilasari, S.H. as the Head of Auction Service Section and Class I Auction Officer of the State Property and Auction Service Office of Surakarta, on January 10, 2018

Lawless, R. M., Robbennolt, J. K., & Ulen, T. (2010). Empirical methods in law (p. 172). Alphen aan den Rijn: Aspen Publishers.

Soekanto, S. (2012). Introduction to Legal Research, Jakarta: University of Indonesia Press

Sutedi, A. (2012). Mortgage Law, 2nd Edition. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ulen, T. S. (2002). a nobel Prize in legal science: theory, empirical Work, and the scientific method in the study of law. U. Ill. L. Rev., 875.

Webley, L. (2010). Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research. The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research, 926-950.

Wiwoho. (2014). Journal of Indonesian Banking Law, 1st Edition. Surakarta: UNS Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i1.480

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.