Law Enforcement of Patent Rights in Indonesia in Decree Number 25 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 Jo. Decree Number 295 K/Pdt.Sus-HaKI/2013 Jo. Decree Number 53/Patent/2012/PN.Niaga. Jkt. Pst
Abstract
The nature of Intellectual Property Rights is vulnerable to violations so protection is urgently needed. In principle, IPR legal protection contains recognition of said IPR, rights that within a certain period of time enjoy or exploit these assets, can only enjoy or exploit these rights with the permission or license of the right owner, because protection and recognition can only be given specifically or exclusively to the party owning the intellectual property. The formulation of the problem in this study is how is the position of patent enforcement cases in Indonesia in Decision No. 25 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 jo. Decision Number 295 K/Pdt.Sus-HaKI/2013 jo. Decision Number 53/Paten/2012/PN.Niaga.Jkt. Pst? (2) How is the analysis of Decision Number 25 PK/Pdt Sus-HKI/2015 jo. Decision Number 295 K/PdtSus-HaKI/2013 Junto Decision Number 53/Paten/2012/PN NiagaJktPst? The method used is descriptive qualitative, data sources obtained from books, articles, decisions, and laws. The results of this study are that there are many violations of intellectual property ownership in Indonesia and these violations become disputes either filed in court or resolved out of court. The Commercial Court has the authority to examine and decide on other cases in the field of commerce which are determined by law, including those in the field of IPR, especially patents. The procedural law used is lex specialist. In Decision Number 53/Paten/2012/PN.Niaga.Jkt. Pst. dated March 13, 2013, the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court rejected the Plaintiff's claim. However, at the cassation level, the decision was canceled by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia through Decision Number 295 K/Pdt.Sus-HaKI/2013 dated 5 September 2013 and then in line with Decision Number 25 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 dated 29 May 2015 at the Review level. It can be concluded from the a quo decision, namely that an essential element in obtaining a patent is "the element of novelty of the invention".
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Henry Donald Lbn. Toruan, Intellectual Property Rights Dispute Resolution through Quick Events, Legal and Human Rights Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, 2017, p. 1
Rani Pajrin, "Small Claim Court (SCC) Principles in Resolving Intellectual Property Rights Disputes in Indonesia (Focus on Study of Brand Rights and Copyrights)," Journal of Widya Pranata Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2019): p. 163-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v1i2.47
Insan Budi Maulana, "Application of Patents Since the Patent Law No. 6 of 1989 to Patent Law no. 13 of 1997: Indonesia's Experience So Far”, Journal of Law, No. 12 Vols. 6 (1999): p. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol6.iss12.art1
Rignaldo Ricky Wowiling, "Patent Law Enforcement According to the TRIPS Agreement and Its Implementation in Indonesia," Lex Crimen, Vol. VI, No. 10, (2017): p. 85-91. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/18874
Sudargo Gautama, Indonesian Intellectual Property Rights and International Agreements: TRIPS, GATT, Uruguay Round (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1994), 2.
Rignaldo Ricky Wowiling, Op. cit.
Sudargo Gautama, Op. cit.
Abdul Bari Azed, Compilation of International Intellectual Property Rights Conventions Ratified by Indonesia (Jakarta: Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights, Ministry of Law and Human Rights in collaboration with the Issuing Board of the Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, 2006), p.15.
Pipin Syarifin & Dedah Jubaedah, Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia (Bandung: Pustaka Bani Quraish, 2004), 126.
H.OK. Saidin, Legal Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007), p. 146.
Khaerudin, A. K., "IPR Audit as a Means of Preventing IPR Violations by Small Industry Actors," Serambi Hukum, Vol. 8, No. 2, (2015): p. 103-122. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/23096-ID-audit-hki- as-sarana-penprevention-pelanggaran-hki-oleh-pelaku-industri-small.pdf
Dewi Sulistianingsih, "Problematics and Characteristics of Intellectual Property Dispute Resolution Through the Indonesian National Arbitration Board," QISTIE Scientific Journal of Law, Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019): p. 166-177. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v12i2.3135
Republic of Indonesia, Law on Patents, Law Number 13 of 2016, Article 1 point (1).
Muhammad Djumhana and Djubaedillah, 2003, Intellectual Property Rights: History, Theory and Practice in Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, p. 141
Dewi Sulistianingsih, Op. cit.
Jerry Vicky Mawu, "Patent Dispute Resolution according to Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents," Lex et Societatis, Vol. V, No. 7 (2017): p. 71-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v5i7.18091
Directory of Rulings of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, “Decision of the Supreme Court 25 PK/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015” https://decision3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/decision/8847c99b7b5c97c6d86b679fae275d8c.html accessed 18 July 2021.
Directory of Rulings of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, “Decision of the Supreme Court 295 K/PDT.SUS-HAKI/2013” https://decision3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/decision/1485853521eb1f66f3adb92c2487b381.html accessed 18 July 2021.
Rani Pajrin, Op. cit.
I Gede Febryan Karwur, “Legal Arrangements regarding Authorities and Settlement Procedures
Disputes in the Field of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR),” Lex Privatum, Vol. VI No. 8 (2018), p. 90-101 https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/22864
Center for Judicial Technical Education and Training of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, "Introduction to Special Civil Cases in the Education and Training Module Phase 3 of the General Court Integrated Judge Candidate Education and Training Program," https://e-learning.mahkamahagung.go.id/course/view.php ?id=1364§ion=14 accessed 18 July 2021.
H.OK. Saidin, Op. Cit., p. 13-15.
Mochammad Bambang Ribowo, Kholis Roisah, "Legal Protection of Simple Patents in the Patent Law System in Indonesia (Comparative Study with the Patent Law System in China)," Notarius, Vol. 12 No. 1 (2019): p. 42-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i1.23761
Rignaldo Ricky Wowiling, Op. cit.
Riko Fajar Romadhon, M. Fathan Nautika, “Patent Doctrine in Apple's Dispute Against Samsung Study of the Hague Court Decision 396057/KG ZA 11-730 Patent Doctrinesin The Apple Vs Samsung Dispute An Analysis on the Den Haag Court Number 396057/KG ZA 11- 730,” Judicial Journal, Vol. 5 No. 3 (2012): 316-330 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v5i3.127
Mochammad Bambang Ribowo, Kholis Roisah, Op. cit.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i5.4641
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.