Advocate Rights of Immunity as a Criminal Law Effort in the Criminal Justice System

Erlinda Yulia Purnomo, Sulistyanta Sulistyanta

Abstract


Advocates have a very heavy burden in defense, in other words that the Advocate's authority is to defend or handle cases from the investigation stage to execution by a judge's decision if it is a criminal case, whereas in civil cases, the Advocate must defend with a passive nature of justice, or the parties more active in litigation. The existence of an Advocate as a profession that is free, independent and responsible in carrying out his profession, a profession that is said to be a noble office This results in vulnerability to the Advocate profession, due to the noble function of Advocates to carry out the orders of the Law and as a form of protection of human rights, so that Advocates must have the right of immunity every time they carry out their functions and duties as an Advocate. that the right of immunity that exists in Advocates will indirectly be reduced, with the Criminalization of Advocates who defend in Court this will have an impact on the role and burden of Advocates in handling cases, arrangements regarding the criminalization of Advocates are regulated in the chapter regarding crimes against court process (Contempt of Court).


Keywords


Immunity; Advocate; Criminal Justice System

Full Text:

PDF

References


Book

Frans Hendra Winarta, 1995, Advokat indonesia citra, idealisme dan keprihatinan. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

H.P Panggabean, 2010“Manajemen Advokasi”, Penerbit, Alumni: Jakarta.

John Kenedi, 2010 Penegakan Hukum Pidana . Bunga Rampai Press: Jakarta.

Muladi, 1995, Kapita Selekta System Peradilan Pidana, Badan Penerbit Undip: Semarang.

Mardjono Reksodiputro,2010. Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Badan Penerbit Undip Press: Semarang.

Romli Atmasasmita 1983, Bunga Rampai Hukum Acara Pidana, Bina Cipta : Bandung.

Remmelink dalam Eddy OS Hiariej ,2016 Prinsip –Prinsip Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi, Cahaya atma pustaka : Yogyakarta.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Kencana, Prenada Media, 2014.

Journal

Fenny Cahyan, dkk 2021, Kedudukan Hak Imunitas Advokat di Indonesia Jurnal USM Law Review Vol 4 No 1.

Hutabalian, Maslon. 2020. Dampak Dualisme Kepengurusan Organisasi Perhimpunan Advokat Indonesia (PERADI) Terhadap Penegakan Hukum. Artikel Dalam Jurnal Justiqa. Vol. 02. No. 01. Februari.

Solehoddin, 2015 ‘Menakar Hak Imunitas Profesi Advokat, Rechtldee Jurnal Hukum’, Universitas Negeri Malang, Vol. 10 No. 1.

Undang-Undang

Undang-undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat.

Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tengtang Advokat.

Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Putusan

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/26.PUU-XI/2013.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i4.4507

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.