“Tough Women Against Pandemic Covid-19” Speech Acts of Women's Arguments in Public Discussions: Pragma-Dialectical Studies
Abstract
This article aims to find out the argumentative speech acts used by women in the talk show forum discussing the theme of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Through these speech acts, it can be seen how the mindset of women when arguing. The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method with data collection techniques referred to and noted. The data used in this study is in the form of a speech in Rosi's speech on the topic "Tough Women Against Pandemic" using Pragma-dialectical data analysis techniques. The results show that at each stage of the argument, speech acts are found that build an argument. The argumentative speech acts are assertive, directive, expressive, commissive, and declarative, which are found in four stages of critical discussion. Based on these speech acts, it can be concluded that the women, when presenting their arguments, did not hesitate to apologize, showed fighting power (resilience), were independent and happy, dared to ask for attention, dared to express their point of view, dared to compare, dared to express disagreement, dared to express admiration and women's struggle, dare to convey gender equality, and be firm about women's rights and roles.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alaghbary, G. S. (2020). Looting Leads to Shooting: A Pragma-dialectical Analysis of President Trump’s Argumentative Discourse on Floyd’s Death. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1854–1868. https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.851011.
Artati, Wardhana, D. E. C., & Basuki, R. (2020). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Asertif , Direktif , Ekspresif , Komisif , dan Deklaratif pada Program Gelar Wicara Mata Najwa. Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(1), 43–57.
Astuti, S., Simatupang, N., & Dewi, R. (2018). Gender And Feminism In Sports :Motivation And Interests Of Women Choose FIK UNIMED. 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018), 200(Aisteel), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.68.
Atqiya, N., Yuliati, L., & Diantoro, M. (2020). Eksplorasi Perbedaan Gender Pada Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(9), 1327. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i9.14053.
Betti, M. J., & Ghadhab, A. O. (2020). A Pragma-Dialectical Study of The Argumentative Indicators in American Electoral Campaign Debates. International Journal of Advancement in Social Science and Humanity, 9, 1–2. https://www.ijassh.in/admin1/upload/05 Mohammed Jasim Betti 48533.pdf.
Bihari, J. (2012). Grundlagen der Pragma-Dialektik *. Sprachtheorie Und Germanistische Linguistik, 22(2), 123–135. http://real.mtak.hu/id/eprint/8535.
Carbonere, F., Devicienti, F., Manello, A., & Vannoni, D. (2021). Women on board and firm export attitudes: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 192, 159–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.011.
de Gennaro, D., Loia, F., & Piscopo, G. (2022). Working role of women in a pandemic world: a poetic inquiry. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1373–1392. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2021-0430.
Dezhkameh, A., Layegh, N., & Hadidi, Y. (2021). A critical discourse analysis of covid-19 in iranian and american newspapers. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2021-2103-13.
Drid, T. (2016). A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentative Discourse. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(4), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2016.19.4.20.
Eemeren, F. H. Van. (2012). Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory Twenty Exploaratory Studies (22nd ed.). Springer.
Eemeren, F. H. Van, Houtlosser, P., Snoeck, A. F., Argumentative, H., Dordrecht, S., & Kienpointner, M. (2010). Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans: Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study (pp. 519–524). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9182-7.
Fatmawati, Djamereng, A., & Halik, A. (2020). Pengaruh Intensitas Menonton Program Siaran Mata Najwa Terhadap Pengembangan Wawasan Mahasiswa Ilmu Politik Uin Alauddin Makassar. Jurnal Washiyah, 1(3), 517–533. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/washiyah/article/view/16231.
Garver, E. (2000). Comments on `Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework. Argumentation, 14(3), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007809230938.
Izar, J., Nasution, M. M., & Ratnasari, M. (2020). Assertive Speech Acts in Mata Najwa Program of Episode Gara-Gara Corona. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 53–58.
Jacobson, R. (2021). Why Girls Apologize Too Much. Child Mind Institute. https://childmind.org/article/why-girls-apologize-too-much/.
Kamariah, K., Laksono, K., Savitri, A. D., Suhartono, S., Darni, D., & Pairin, U. (2021). Argumentative Indicators in Mata Najwa Talk Show Pragmadialectical Study. 618(Ijcah), 183–189.
Lee, W. H. A. (2021). Online metapragmatic discourse on “english as taiwan’s second official language”: Multilingualism and ideological contestation. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 19(2), 119–160. https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.202107_19(2).0004.
Linares Bernabéu, E. (2019). The role of humor discourse in the construction of gender identity. Pragmalinguistica, 27, 112–132. https://doi.org/10.25267/pragmalinguistica.2019.i27.06.
Mahsun, M. S. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, metode dan Tekniknya Edisi Revisi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Naqqiyah, Maulidatus Syahrotin, D. (2020). “Di Balik Jengkelnya Jokowi” Sebuah Analisis Semiotik Program Mata Najwa Di Trans7. Mediakita. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 4(1). https://www.jurnal.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/mediakita/article/view/2447/1101.
Nasihan, D. (2012). Wacana Debat Argumentasi dalam Java Overland Versities English Debate (JoVED) 2011 (Kajian Pragma-dialektika) [Universitas Gajah Mada]. http://etd.repository. ugm.ac.id/home/detail_pencarian/54851.
Nuraini, F. I., Santoso, D., Rahmi, N. S., & Kaptania, R. O. (2020). Expressive Speech Acts in “Lakon Politik Republik” Episode of “Mata Najwa” Talkshow. LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v5i1.1853.
Nurhadi, J. (2016). Utilization of Pragma-stylistics Strategies in Learning Context for Communicating Global Peace. Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana, 1(2), 106–116.
Pranowo. (2020). Sumbangan Bahasa Indonesia Terhadap Pengendalian COVID-19. Semantik, 9(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v9i2.p59-76.
Pratama, Y., & Abidin, S. (2020). Analisis Wacana Hidup Mati Listrik Pada Program Talk Show Mata Najwa Di Stasiun Tv Trans 7. Scientia Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 2(2).
Ramos, G. (2020). Women at the core of the fight against COVID-19 crisis. OECD. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=127_127000-awfnqj80me&title=Women-at-the-core-of-the-fight-against-COVID-19-crisis%0Ahttp://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/en/.
Ryznar, A. (2018). PRAGMASTILISTIKA LIRSKE PJESME (Ivan Slamnig: Kad mi svega bude dosta). FLUMINENSIA : Časopis Za Filološka Istraživanja, 30(2), 253–268. https://hrcak.srce.hr /index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=310866.
Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Sayginer, C., & Kurtsan, K. (2022). An Extended Decision-Making Model of Coastal Recreational Area Use During the COVID-19 Through Goal-Directed Behavior and Perceived Benefits Framework. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(2), 541–556. https://doi.org /10.47836/pjssh.30.2.07.
Searle, J. R. (2011). Speech acts An Essay in The Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Subuki, M. (2015). Dimensi Pragma-Dialektis Fatwa. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 15(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v15i2.2856.
Sumarlam, dkk. (2010). Teori dan Praktik Analisis Wacana. Pustaka Cakra.
Svačinová, I. (2020). Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type. Argumentation, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09524-0.
Syasyila, K., Lee Gin, L., & Mohamad, Z. S. (2022). The Meaning in Life and Courage of Malaysian Frontliners During COVID-19. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(2), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.2.11.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2002). Argumentation Theory: An Overview of Approaches and Research Themes. In Eriksson et al. (eds) Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts. Trinity Press.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse (2nd ed.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2012). The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion. Argumentation, 26(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-012-9274-7.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2018). Argumentation Theory : A Pragma- Dialectical Perspective. Springer.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2020). From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the (35th ed.). Springer.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1988). Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation Library, 2(1), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_10.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation The pragma-dialectical approach In. United States of America by Cambridge University Press.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2015). The relevance problem in the analysis of argumentative texts - A pragma-dialectical reconstruction. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 3(5), 57. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v3i5.21437.
van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumentative Indicators A pragma-Dialectical Study. Springer.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Peng, W. (2017). Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Poppel, L. (2020). The Relevance of Metaphor in Argumentation. Uniting Pragma-dialectics and Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 170, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.pragma.2020.09.007.
Visser, J., Bex, F., Reed, C., & Garssen, B. (2011). Correspondence between the pragma-dialectical discussion model and the argument interchange format. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 23(36), 189–224. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.363108.
Wijaya. (2009). Sosiolinguistik Kajian Teori dan Analisis. Pustaka Pelajar.
Yildirim†, T. M., & Hande Eslen-Ziya†. (2020). The differential impact of COVID-19 on the workconditions of women and men academics duringthe lockdown. FEMINIST FRONTIERS. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12529.
Zaki, L. B. (2017). EFL Students’ Writing Quality in Argumentative Essays Across Genders [Universitas Negeri Malang]. http://repository.um.ac.id/58952/.
Zhmakina, T. (2019). Pragma-Dialectical Interpretation Of Argumentative Fallacies In Political Discourse. Весці БДПУ, 5–10.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i4.4505
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.