Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice from the Perspective of the Dominus Litis Principle

Mohd Din, Asmadi Syam, Ihdi Karim Makinara

Abstract


Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecutions Based on Restorative Justice is considered one of the efforts for ideal law enforcement in achieving legal objectives, and has expanded the object of termination of prosecution as stipulated in "Article 140 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.  In terms of the hierarchy of legislation, this regulation is still in question. The question that could be raised here is about the position of the authority to terminate the prosecution from the perspective of the prosecutor's position as the controller of the case which is called dominus litis. This study aims to determine "the position of the authority to terminate prosecutions based on Restorative Justice from the perspective of the principle of dominus litis.  The research method used is normative juridical research. The results showed that Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice" is a form of law enforcement and justice policy within the scope of restorative justice which is part of the prosecutor's authority based on "Article 32 and Article 35 of Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office."  In the framework of law enforcement, realizing justice, based on the law that lives in society as the mandate of the constitution.  Therefore, this regulation is an answer to the demands of law enforcement developments that not only emphasize legal certainty, but must also be able to touch the sense of justice and legal expediency in society The position of the authority to terminate prosecutions based on restorative justice is the discretionary prosecution and the concretization of the principle  of dominus litis.


Keywords


Restorative Justice; Authority; Termination of Prosecution.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amdani, Yusi, ‘Konsep Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem’, Al-Adalah, XIII.1 (2016), 61–76

Arief, Barda Nawawi, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya, 2002)

———, Reformasi Sistem Peradilan (Sistem Penegakan Hukum) Di Indonesia (Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2012)

Arin Karniasari, ‘Tinjauan Teoritis, Historis, Yuridis Dan Praktis Terhadap Wewenang Jaksa Agung Dalam Mengesampingkan Perkara Demi Kepentingan Umum’ (Universitas Indonesia, 2012)

Darmono, Penyampingan Perkara Pidana Seponering Dalam Penegakan Hukum (Jakarta: Solusi Publising, 2013)

Efendi, Marwan, Kejaksaan RI, Posisi, Dan Fungsinya (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005)

Faisal, Menorobos Positivisme Hukum (Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 2010)

Ferdi Saputra Et al, ‘Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Pidana Jika Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Oportunitas Dan Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik’, USU Law Journal, Vol.II-No. (2014)

Handayani, Yeni, ‘Jaksa Agung Dan Pengesampingan Perkara Demi Kepentingan Umum’, Jurnal Rechtvinding, 2016, 1–7

Harahap, M. Yahya, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Edisi Kedua) Seri : Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2000)

HR, Ridwan, Hukum Administrasi Negara (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013)

Kertayasa, Mansyur, Restorative Justice Dan Prospeknya Dalam Kebijakan Legislasi, Makalah Disampaikan Pada Seminar Nasional, Peran Hakim Dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme. Menuju Penelitian Yang Agung, Diselenggarakan IKAHI Dalam Rangka Ulang Tahun IKAHI Ke-59, 25 April 2012, 2012

Kurniawan, Mahendra, Pedoman Naska Akademik PERDA Partisipatif (Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2007)

Lasmadi, Sahuri, ‘Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia’, Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (JIMIH), 2011

Legoh, Romel, ‘Penghentian Penuntutan Demi Kepentingan Hukum’, Lex et Societatis , Vol. II/No. 8/Sep-Nov/2014, II.8 (2014), 55–64

Manthovani, Reda, ‘Penerapan Asas Dominis Litis Dalam UU KPK’, Hukum Online, 2019

Purba, Johnlar, Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Bermotif Ringan Dengan Restorative Justice (Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara, 2017)

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Membedah HukumProgresif (Jakarta: Buku Kompas, 2008)

Safaat, Jimly Ashiddiqi dan M. Ali, Theory Hans KelsenTentang Hukum Cet I (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendreral & Kepaniteraan Makamah Konstitusi RI, 2006)

Sahbani, Agus, ‘Kejaksaan Hentikan 222 Perkara Lewat Keadilan Restoratif’

Sasongko, Hari, Penuntutan Dan Tehnik Membuat Surat Dakwaan (Surabaya: Dharma Surya Berlian, 1996)

Syam, Asmadi, and Mohd Din, ‘Juridical Implication and Binding Authority of Dropping Charge Based on Restorative Justice’, 8.1 (2022), 185–90

The Eighth United Nations, Guidelines On The Role Of Prosecutor Adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990 Bab Fungsi Diskresi, 1990

Triwati, Ani, ‘Jaksa Agung Dan Pengesampingan Perkara Demi Kepentingan Umum’, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 6.April (2021), 32–54

US Legal, ‘Dominus Litis Law and Legal Definition’




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i2.4364

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.