Evaluation on Humanitarian Intervention in Myanmar: Is It a Placebo Effect?
Abstract
Historically, humanitarian intervention has been used to support political and economic interests. As the globalization effect, humanitarian intervention was carried out sincerely to deal with a humanitarian crisis by providing assistance. Myanmar is a country that experienced a humanitarian crisis a long time ago. Various humanitarian intervention methods have been done in Myanmar to handle the humanitarian crisis. Since the military coup in February 2021, the crisis has escalated and the effectiveness of the humanitarian assistance is still questionable in dealing with the crisis. This article will evaluate the governance of humanitarian interventions provided by INGOs and how they resolve the humanitarian crisis. The analytical methods used were qualitative research that used theory of domestication policy. In evaluating the effectiveness of humanitarian intervention governance, the authors analyze it from the point of view of the international humanitarian agency and the Myanmar government. This study found that due to the domestic policy made by the junta, which seem not want to empower the people. Further evaluation is on the humanitarian assistance to Myanmar that is not covered the needs and only temporary or placebo effect.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Jazeera. (2022, June 1). More than 1 million people displaced in Myanmar: UN | News | Al Jazeera. Aljazeera.Com. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/1/more-than-1-million-people-displaced-in-myanmar-un.
Alexander, C. (2018). The Soft Power of Development: Aid and Assistance as Public Diplomacy Activities.
Bawana, T. A. (2022). Civil Society Endorsement on Democratization: A Lesson from Myanmar. Jurnal Transformative, 8(1), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2022.008.01.6.
Blazevic, I. (2022, September 27). The world needs to recognise—and support—Myanmar’s ‘humanitarian resistance.’ Myanmarnow. https://myanmar-now.org/en/news/the-world-needs-to-recognise-and-support-myanmars-humanitarian-resistance.
Brown, D., Groen, J., Michelmann, H. J., Soldatos, P., & Hocking, B. (1994). Federalism and International Relations: The Role of Subnational Units. In CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs (Vol. 24, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.2307/3330727.
Carr, T. (2018). Supporting the Transition: Understanding Aid to Myanmar Since 2011. The Asian Foundation, February, 57. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/8091.
Cornish, L. (2021, February 15). Donors respond to the Myanmar coup by redirecting funds | Devex. Devex.Com. https://www.devex.com/news/donors-respond-to-the-myanmar-coup-by-redirecting-funds-99141.
Décobert, A., & Wells, T. (2020). Interpretive Complexity and Crisis: the History of International Aid to Myanmar. European Journal of Development Research, 32(2), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00238-y.
Development Bank, A. (2021). Asian Development Bank and Myanmar: Fact Sheet. www.adb.org/countries/.
Dittmer, L. (2014). Burma or Myanmar? The Struggle for National Identity. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
European Commission. (2022, May 22). Myanmar/Burma. https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/where/asia-and-pacific/myanmarburma_en.
Faisal, Z. N., Fakultas, M., Universitas, H., Kuala, S., Hukum, F., Syiah, U., & Kemanusiaan, I. (2021). Tindakan Intervensi Kemanusiaan melalui Aksi R2P (Responsibility to Protect). Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan, 5(3), 176–184.
Gulati, J., & Khosa, I. (2013). Humanitarian Intervention : To Protect State Sovereignty. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume, 41(3), 397–416.
Gustafsson, M., Merino, R., & Scurrah, M. (2020). Domestication of international norms for sustainable resource governance : Elite capture in Peru. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(January 2019), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1904.
Heimo, L. (2019). Domestication of Global Policy Norms. In Welfare and Social Protection in Contemporary Latin America (pp. 134–159).
Heinze, E. A. (2004). Law, Force, and Human Rights : The Search for a Sufficiently Principled Legal Basis for Humanitarian Intervention. The Journal of Conflict Studies, 4(1), 5–32.
Hussain, Z. Z. (2011). The effect of domestic politics on foreign policy decision making. E-International Relations Students, 1–12. http://www.e-ir.info/2011/02/07/the-effect-of-domestic-politics-on-foreign-policy-decision-making/.
Lancaster, C. (2007). Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. The University of Chicago Press.
Lidén, K. (2019). The Protection of Civilians and ethics of humanitarian governance : beyond intervention and resilience. Disasters, 43(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12335.
M.Ravi Law. (2019). Civil Society in Myanmar: International Non-Governmental Organization/ Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOS/NGOS). Mravilaw. https://mravilaw.org/civil-society-in-myanmar-international-non-governmental-organizations-non-governmental-organizations-ingos-ngos/#.
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2022, February 8). Humanitarian assistance to the people of Myanmar - Myanmar | ReliefWeb. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Japan. https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/humanitarian-assistance-people-myanmar.
OCHA. (2022). HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE PLAN MYANMAR (Issue January).
Parmar, P. K., Leigh, J., Venters, H., & Nelson, T. (2019). Violence and mortality in the Northern Rakhine State of Myanmar, 2017: results of a quantitative survey of surviving community leaders in Bangladesh. The Lancet Planetary Health, 3(3), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30037-3.
Sarkin, J., & Pietschmann, M. (2006). Legitimate Humanitarian Intervention under International Law in the Context of the Current Human Rights and Humanitarian Crisis in Burma (Myanmar). Hong Kong LJ, 33(October), 371.
Sationo, T. I. (2019). Humanitarian Intervention Menurut Hukum Internasional dan Implikasinya Dalam Konflik Bersenjata. Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 2(1), 65–88.
Seybolt, T. B. (2007). Humanitarian Military Intervention: The Conditions for Success and Failure. http://books.google.com/books?id=m1O1lcF2GqsC&pgis=1.
Shang, P. P. (2021). Myanmar’s Foreign Policy: Shifting Legitimacy, Shifting Strategic Culture. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211044481.
Sim, D. (2022). Asean ‘deeply disappointed’ with Myanmar over peace plan, Indonesia’s Jokowi wants junta banned from summits. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3199348/asean-deeply-disappointed-myanmar-over-peace-plan-indonesias-jokowi-wants-junta-banned-summits.
The UN Refugee Agency. (2022). Myanmar emergency: Displacement overview | Global Focus. In UNHCR. https://reporting.unhcr.org/document/3248.
UNHCR. (2022). Myanmar situation. Reporting.Unhcr.Org. https://reporting.unhcr.org/myanma rsituation.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2022). Myanmar Situation Funding Update - 2022 | Global Focus. In UNHCR.org. https://reporting.unhcr.org/myanmar-situation-funding-2022.
Wahyuningrum, Y. (2022). Wawancara.
Weiss, T. G. (2013). International Organization and Global Governance. In International Organization and Global Governance. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203795972.
Welsh, J. M. (2004). Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations (Oxford University Press (ed.)).
World Bank. (2022). World Bank Myanmar Monitoring Platform. Worldbank.Org. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/myanmar/brief/monitoring.
Yaghy, A., & Shields, C. L. (2021). To Intervene or Not to Intervene: Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Myanmar. Ophthalmology, 128(12), 1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha. 2021.04.018.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i12.4225
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.