Translation of Stative Verbs from English into Uzbek and Uzbek into English

Shirina Ziyovuddin Kizi Tashpulatova

Abstract


This article gives information about stative verbs and the problems of translating them from English into Uzbek. Problems of stative verbs and their types are discussed. The scientific and theoretical views of several Uzbek and foreign scholars have been analyzed and personal relations have been expressed. Examples from different kinds of works such as S. Maugham’s “Ms. Mabel”, T. Murad’s “Husband and wife”, A. Kahhor’s “Pomegranate” and K. Mansfield’s “Destiny” were compared with the original and analyzed.


Keywords


Equivalence; Stative Verbs; Motion Manner; Action Verbs; Lexical–Semantic Field; Methodological Inaccuracy; Accuracy; Adequate; Degrees of Stative Verbs; Attraction; Lacunae; System Asymmetry; Autonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barkhudarov L. Yazyk i perevod: voprosy obshchey i chastnoy teorii perevoda. – M .: Mejdunar. otnosheniya. 1975. – p. 240.

Daiches D. A critical history of English literature – Allied publishers: 1979. – p. 319.

Ford B. The pelican guide to English literature. – London: Penguin books, 1958. –p. 512.

Karimov G. History of Uzbek literature. 3 books. – Tashkent: Teacher, 1975. – p. 326.

Khudoyorovich, K. K., Rasuljanovna, I. N., Khalmuratovna, R. Z., & Eshkobilovna, K. D. (2020). The Issues of Word Choice in Fiction Translation. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(04).

Komissarov V. Sovremennoe perevodovedenie. – M.: ETS, 2004. – p. 424.

Kurenkova T. Lexical–semantic field and other fields in modern linguistics // Sibirskiy aerokosmicheskiy zhurnal. 2006. №4 (11). – p. 176.

Mallaev N. History of Uzbek literature. 1 book. – Tashkent: Teacher, 1965. – p. 658.

Mallaev N. History of Uzbek literature. 2 books. – Tashkent: Teacher, 1967. – p. 383.

Papafragou А., Selimis S. Event categorisation and language: A cross–linguistic study of motion // Language and Cognitive Processes, 2010. – p. 224–260.

Rahmatullaeva Sh. Linguoculturological and sociopragmatic aspects of the forms of movement in the Uzbek language. – Nasaf, 2018. – p. 96.

Sayfullaeva R., Mengliev B., Boqieva G. et al. Modern Uzbek literary language. – Tashkent: FT, 2010. – p. 208.

Schweitzer A. Translation and linguistics. – M.: Voenizdat, 1973. – p. 281.

Schweitzer A. Translation theory: status, problems, aspects. – M.: 2009. – p. 205.

Vinogradov V. Introduction to translation (general and lexical questions) – М.: Izd–vo in–ta obshch. sred. education RAO, 2001. – p. 224. Kade O. Problema perevoda v svete teorii kommunikatsii // Voprosy teorii perevoda v zarubejnoy lingvistike. – M.: Mejdunar. otnosheniya, 1978. – p. 69–90.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i11.4201

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.