Developing Formative Evaluation Model to Improve Students' Learning Outcome at Vocational High Schools

Atin Prihatin, - Sudiyanto, Hermanu Joebagio

Abstract


Evaluation is divided into several kinds, one of which is formative evaluation. Formative evaluation is appropriately used because the process involves students directly in the learning process and is able to improve students' conceptual understanding. The qualitative data were taken from a field research consisting of: 1) observations, observing the students' activities during teaching-learning process and their learning activities while doing evaluation; 2) Interviews, the techniques used were open interview, the interview conducted with the informants using interview guides and documentation analysis. From the results of the case study, some problems were found. To overcome the problems, a model of formative evaluation needs to be developed in order to provide fast feedback for the students and the teachers. The purpose of this research is to make formative evaluation model for ICT (Information and Communication Technology) learning in Vocational High Schools. The design of the research was research and development of a formative evaluation model. The instruments used were questionnaires for product feasibility tests including book review validation, pre-learning quiz instruments, post-learning quiz instruments and product-segment models. Based on the results of qualitative data, interviews were conducted to both students and ICT teachers, and documentation recorded. It was found that 90% teachers had not done formative evaluation system well. On one hand, the results of quantitative data analysis show that the results of student learning, especially ICT subjects were still relatively low. From the above data, it can be concluded that it is necessary to do research on the development of formative evaluation model to improve student learning outcomes in Vocational High Schools.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Borg, W., R. & Gall, M., D. (1983). Educational Research. An Introduction (4th ed.). New York: Longman Inc.

Cruz, E. Diaz, H. & Kortemeyer, G. (2011). The Effect of Formative Assesment in Brazilian University Physics Courses. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica, 33(4): 4501.

Cohen, A., R. (2005). Measuring the Effect of Formative Assessment Techniques in Physics at East Stroudsburg University. Review of Content Study: the CETP-PA Monograph.

Dufresne, J., Robert, G., J., William. Mestre, P., Jose. & Leonard, J., William. (2000). ASK.IT /A2L: Assessing Student Knowledge with Instructional Technology. University of Massachusetts Physics Educa-tion Research Group: UMPERG Technical Report PERG-2000#09-SEP#1-28.

Etkina, E. (2002). Formative and Summative Assessment in a Physics Class: Time to Change. PERC PUBLISH-ING: 3.

Etkina, E. Heuvelen, V., A. White Brahmia, S. Brookes, T., D. Gentile, M. Murthy, S. Rosengrant, D. &

Warren, A. (2006). Scientific Abilities and Their Assessment. Physics Education Research 2, 020103: 1-3.

Fakcharoenphol, W. Potter, E. & Stelzer, T. (2011). What Students Learn When Studying Physics Practice Exam Problems. Physics Education Research 7, 010107: 4.

Heritage, M. (2009). The Process of Formative Assessment. Presentation at the Meeting of Iowa Assessment for Learning Institute, Des Moines, IA.

Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment and Feedback. Oxon: Routledge.

Margono, G. (2006). Standar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Buletin BNSP: Media Komunikasi dan Dialog Standar Pendidikan, I(2): 40–47.

McAlpine, M. (2002). Principles of Assessment. University of Luton: Computer Assisted Assessment Centre.

Nicol, J., D. & Dick, D. (2006). Formative Assessment and Self Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Goog Feedback Prectice. Published in Studies in Higher Education, 31(2): 199-218.

Otsuka, L., J. & Rocha, d., V., H. (2007). Online Assessment: Supporting the Formative Assessment of Collaborative Learning Activities. IADIS Intenational Conference: ISBN: 978-972-8924-44-7.

Sadler, R., D. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18: 119-144.

Stull, C., J. Varnum, J., S. & Ducette, J. (2011). The Many Faces of Formative Assessment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1): 30-39. ISSN 1912-9129.

Sudjana, N. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wagner, C. & Vaterlaus, A. (2011). Promoting Formative Assessment in High School Teaching of Physics. PACS: ISSN 1870-9095.

Wang, X. & Le, T. (2006). The Discourse of Transition from Summative to Formative Assessment in China. AARE: WAN06117.

Milles & Huberman. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i5.377

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.