The Position of the Principle of Piercing the Corporate Veil in Company Law in Indonesia

Eduardus Bayo Sili, Kurniawan Kurniawan, Widodo Dwiputro

Abstract


A limited liability company is a legal entity. This means that shareholders are responsible for the number of shares owned. Likewise, the board of directors and the board of commissioners in carrying out their duties and obligations for and on behalf of a limited liability company as a legal entity. However, this general principle is excluded, due to the application of the principle of piercing the corporate veil. This study intends to analyze what factors lead to the application of the principle of piercing the corporate veil and what are the legal consequences. The approach used in this research is the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The legal material analysis method used in this study is a normative method, namely by conducting prescriptions with deductive-inductive reasoning to produce propositions or concepts as answers to the problems studied. The results of the study show that the shareholder’s responsibility is not limited to the number of shares owned when the shareholder commits ultra vires (abuse of authority). Likewise, the responsibility of the board of directors and the board of commissioners in accordance with the authority they have sourced from the law and the articles of association of the company which should be the responsibility of the legal entity has turned into the personal responsibility of the directors and commissioners for carrying out ultra vires.

 


Keywords


Legal Entity; Piercing The Corporate Veil

Full Text:

PDF

References


Black, Henry Campbell, 1990, Black’s Law Dictionary, West Publishing Co, ST. Paul Minn,

Fuady, Munir, 2002, Doktrin-Doktrin Moderen dalam Corporate Law dan Eksistensinya dalam Hukum Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung.

Hartono, Siti Soemarti, Perseroan Terbatas dalam Pendirian, Paper dalam Seminar Sehari Hukum Perseroan dan Hukum Pertanggungan (Asuransi) dalam Kenyataan dan Harapan, Fakultas Hukum UGM, Yogyakarta, 1988.

Hadikusuma, Sutantyo R. dan Soemantoro, 1991, Pengertian Pokok Hukum Perusahaan, Bentuk-Bentuk Perusahaan yang Berlaku di Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Kelsen, Hans, 1992, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory, Clarendon, Oxford.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2004, Penemuan Hukum, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

------------------------------, 1999, Mengenal Hukum, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Pakpahan, Normin S., 1997, Kamus Hukum Ekonomi ELIPS, Proyek ELIPS, Jakarta.

Pramono, Nindyo, 2013, Hukum PT Go Publik dan Pasar Modal, Andi, Yogyakarta.

Purwosutjipto, H.M.N., 2008, Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia, Bentuk-Bentuk Perusahaan, Bagian Kedua, Djmbatan, Jakarta.

Puspa, Yan Pramadya, Kamus Hukum Edisi Lengkap Bahasa Belanda, Indonesia,Inggris, Aneka Ilmu, Semarang, Tanpa Tahun

Rido, Ali, 1977, Badan Hukum dan Kedudukan Hukum Perkumpulan, Koperasi, Yayasan, Wakaf, Alumni, Bandung.

Sili, Eduardus Bayo, 2015, Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Investor Obligasi, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i3.3664

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.