Challenges on Obtaining Legal Protection Through Notary Honorary Council for The Notary Presumed to Commit Crime

Juleni Juleni, Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto

Abstract


The current study aimed at discovering the notary' challenge during their attempt at obtaining legal protection when facing an allegation of committing criminal activity. In carrying out their duty as a public officer who is authorized to make authentic deed and other authorities under the law, Notary needs to obtain legal protection for the sake of legal certainty and legal service function. The current study could be classified as an empirical legal study. This study employed primary and secondary data collected from interviews and document analysis.  The collected data were analyzed by using an interactive model of qualitative analysis technique. Based on article 66 paragraph (1) of Law of The Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 about the changes to the law number 30 of 2004 regarding position of notary, it has been regulated that for judicial process, investigators, public prosecutors, or judges shall obtain the consent from The Notary Honorary Council to perform an investigation towards a Notary. Notary Honorary Council is an institution that borns to provide legal protection towards a Notary. Especially Regional Notary Honorary Council who is authorized in this case, by its panel of Inspector. However, in fact, there are several factors which make notaries had not felt optimal legal protection from the Regional Notary Honorary Council.

Keywords


Legal Protection; Notary; Notary Honorary Council; Board of Inspector

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Kohar. (1983). Notaris Dalam Praktek Hukum. Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Bagir Manan. (2004). Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Pers.

Endang Purwaningsih. (2011). “Penegakan Hukum Jabatan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Berdasarkan Pancasila Dalam Rangka Kepastian Hukum”. Jurnal Hukum Adil, 2 (3), 324.

Habib Adjie. (2009). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Hartanti Sulihandari dan Nisya Rifiani. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Profesi Notaris. Jakarta Timur: Dunia Cerdas.

Herlien Soerojo, (2003). Kepastian Hukum Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia. Surabaya: Arkola.

Pengurus Pusat Ikatan Notaris Indonesia. (2008). Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia Dulu, Sekarang dan di Masa Datang. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka.

R.A. Emma Nurita. (2012). Cyber Notary Pemahaman Awal Dalam Konsep Pemikiran. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Sri Utami. (2015). “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris”. Jurnal Hukum Repertorium. 3 (1), 89.

Tan Thong Kie. (2007). Studi Notariat dan Serba-Serbi Notaris, Jakarta: Intermesa.

Trgovĉević Prokić Milena, “Legal Basis Of Notary Public Services“, article on International Journal of Economics and Law, 1(3), 140.

Wawan Tunggal Alam. (2001). Hukum Bicara Kasus-Kasus dalam Kehidupan Sehari-hari. Jakarta: Milenia Populer.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i2.350

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
[email protected]
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.