The Effectiveness of Using the Portfolio Assessment Model to Improve Student Self-Regulated in Economic Learning

Defika Putri Nastiti, Sigit Santoso, Sudiyanto Sudiyanto

Abstract


The study aimed to determine: (1) the differences in the self-regulated of students in economics learning using a portfolio assessment model and without using a portfolio assessment model, and (2) the effectiveness of using a portfolio assessment model on students' self-regulated in economics learning. This research is a quasi-experimental study with a randomized control group pretest-posttest design. The population of this research is class XI students majoring in Social Sciences (IIS) for the academic year 2021/2022 which consists of four classes with a sampling technique, namely cluster random sampling. Based on the lottery results, class XI IIS 1 and 2 were given a portfolio assessment model and class XI IIS 3 and 4 did not use the portfolio assessment model. Data collection techniques used are indirect communication techniques. The data collection tool used is a learning self-regulated questionnaire. The hypothesis was tested using parametric statistics, namely the two-tailed t-test with the help of the SPSS version 20 program at a significance level of 0.05. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) there are differences in the self-regulated learning of students in economic learning using a portfolio assessment model and without a portfolio assessment model, and (2) the effectiveness of using a portfolio assessment model on student self-regulated in economics learning is 0,31.


Keywords


Effectiveness; Portfolio Assessment Model; Self-Regulated Learning; Economic Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam DM. 1992. Portfolio of Assessment And Social Studies: Collecting, Selecting, and Reflecting on What Is Significant. Social Education 56 (2): 103–105.

Alwisol. 2010. Personality Psychology. Malang: UMM Press

Arifin, Zaenal. 2008. Learning Evaluation: Principles, Techniques, and Procedures. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Arikunto, S. 2010. Research Procedure A Practical Approach. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Hidayati, Kana and Endang Listyani. 2012. Theory on the meaning and indicators of learning self-regulated, in http://id.shvoong.com/socialsciences/education/2193115-self-regulated-learning.

Kunandar. 2013. Authentic Assessment (Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes. Based on the 2013 Curriculum). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Livingston, RB, Reynolds, CR, & Willson, V. 2004. Measurement and Assessment in Education. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 65 of 2013. Regarding Standards for the 2013 Primary and Secondary Education Process. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Permendikbud No. 66 of 2013. Regarding Assessment in the 2013 Curriculum. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 104 of 2014. Regarding Assessment of Learning Outcomes by Educators in Primary and Secondary Education. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture

Ross W.E. 1996. The Role of Portfolio Evaluation in Social Studies Teacher Education: How Evaluation Practices Shape Learning Experiences. Articles: Social Education 60 (93): 162–166.

Zimmerman, BJ. 2000. Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. New York: University of New York.

Zimmerman, BJ. 2002. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview Theory into Practice. Journal of Educational Psychology. 41 (2), pp. 64-70.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i2.3484

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.