The Decision of the Constitutional Court Which Is Positive Legislature and Their Implications on Substantial Democracy in Indonesia

Raden Muhammad Mihradi, Dinalara Dermawati Butarbutar, Nazaruddin Lathif, Tiofanny Marselina

Abstract


The decisions of the Constitutional Court are always interesting to observe. First, the Constitutional Court's decision has a broad impact in maintaining and ensuring the guarantee of the principles of the rule of law, human rights and institutionalized democracy. Second, the decisions of the Constitutional Court are always dynamic. Not always conservative. As in the decision of the Constitutional Court, which is positive legislation, it provides a breakthrough that the Constitutional Court is no longer just a norm canceler. However, it can test or create norms on a limited basis with constitutional or conditionally unconstitutional terms. Third, it is certain that the model of the Constitutional Court's decision is positive legislation and risks causing tension with the parliament as the legislator. It is important to study and relate it to the institutionalization of substantial democracy, a democracy that brings justice and equality in the public sphere.


Keywords


Constitutional Court; The Rule of Law; Constitution; Justice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arbi Sanit, Reformasi Politik, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1998.

Bambang Sutiyoso, “Pembentukan MK sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 7, Nomor 6, Desember 2010, hlm 27.

Benny K Harman, Konfigurasi Politik dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia, Jakarta: ELSAM, 1997.

Benny K Harman, Mempertimbangkan MK: Sejarah Pemikiran Pengujian UU terhadap UUD, Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2013.

Donny Gahral Adian, Demokrasi Kami, Depok: Koekoesan, 2006.

Eep Saefulloh Fatah, Konflik, Manipulasi dan Kebangkrutan Orde Baru: Manajemen Konflik Malari, Petisi 50 dan Tanjung Priok, Jakarta: Burung Merak, 2010.

Fajar Laksono Suroso, Potret Relasi Mahkamah Konstitusi-Legislator: Konfrontatif atau Kooperatif, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2018.

H.Ach Rubaie, Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perspektif Filosofis, Teoritis dan Yuridis, Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo, 2017.

Hans Kelsen, Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara, terjemahan Raisul Muttaqien, (Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusa Media, 2006).

Jimly Asshidiqie, Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara, Jakarta: KONPRESS,2006.

Mahfud MD, Hukum dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi, Jakarta: Gama Media,1999.

Martitah, Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature, Jakarta: KONpress,2013.

Maruarar Siahaan. Hukum Acara MK Republik Indonesia, (edisi II). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2011.

MKRI, Sejarah MK, diakses dari https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.ProfilMK&id=1, pada 16 Januari 2020, pukul 17.35.

Priyo Budi Santoso, Birokrasi Pemerintah Orde Baru: Perspektif Kultural dan Struktural, Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 1993.

Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK Republik Indonesia, Hukum Acara MK, Jakarta: MK RI, 2010.

Tiofany Marselina, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Sifat Negative Legislature dan Positive Legislature Dalam Putusan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Dikaitkan Dengan Putusan MK Nomor 48/PUU-IX/2011”, Skripsi, FH Universitas Pakuan, 2021.

Willy Purna Samadhi dalam AE Priyono dan Usman Hamid (Editor), Merancang Arah Baru Demokrasi: Indonesia Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia, 2014.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i12.3269

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.