Social Reconciliation of Atoni Pah Meto Community Through Tae Lilo Ritual Communication

Yermia Djefri Manafe, Stevridan Yantus Neolaka

Abstract


This research is about the importance of Tae Lilo ritual communication in terms of restoring social relation or social reconciliation among Atoni Pah Meto community in relation to the form of interaction between society and surrounding environment, both natural environment and social environment. The Tae Lilo ritual is actually an expressive form of Atoni Pah Meto's belief system. The important roles of Tae Lilo ritual as a form of social reconciliation of Atoni Pah Meto community are: to eliminate conflict; can overcome divisions and build social solidarity among community members; able to unite two conflicting principles in society; enabling Atoni Pah Meto's indigenous peoples to gain new motivation and strength in order to return to normal life as usual in daily life; can be a powerful tool in conditioning social situations. The method used in this research was communication ethnography, which is the application of ethnographic methods on the patterns or ways of interacting or communicating in any event or communication process in a community group. The community intended in this case is the Atoni Pah Meto community group that runs the Tae Lilo ritual communication.


Keywords


Social Reconciliation; Atoni Pah Meto; Tae Lilo Ritual; Ritual Communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amsikan, Aplonius.1992. “Rumah Adat Masyarakat Atoni Bukifan (Dawan-Timor Tengah Utara)” dalam “Agenda Budaya Pulau Timor 2”, Piet Manehat & Gregor Neonbasu (Editor). Kupang: Diterbitkan oleh Komisi Komunikasi Sosial Provinsi SVD Timor.

Clifford, James. 1988. “The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art”. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Couldry, Nick. 2005. Media Rituals; Beyond Functionalism., dalam Media Anthropology. Editor: Eric W. Rothenbuhler dan Mihai Coman. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Cunningham, Clark E. 1964. “Order in the Atoni House”, Bijd. 120: 34-68.

Ger

Dahl, Jens et al. 2001. “Masyarakat Adat di Dunia: Eksistensi dan Perjuangannya”. Judul asli: ”Infodte Folk”, (Copenhagen: IWGIA, 1992) oleh Zainab Geiger, Zurich, Switzerland. Edi Petebang (Ed.). Diterbitkan atas kerjasama International Work Group For Indigenous Affairs (IWGAI) Copenhagen, Denmark dan Institut Dayakologi (ID), Pontianak, Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Harris, Peter dan Reilly, Ben, t.t. Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators. IDEA.

Kleden, Ignas. 1998. “Dari Etnografi ke Etnografi Tentang Etnografi: Antropologi Clifford Geertz dalam Tiga Tahap”. Kata Pengantar dalam Clifford Geertz: After The Fact, Dua Negeri, Empat Dasawarsa, Satu Antropologi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit LKIS.

Konradus, Blajan. 2007. “Faot Kanaf-Oe Kanaf Sebagi Representasi Etos Lingkungan (Kajian Etnoekologi tentang Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Adat Atoni Pah Meto di Timor Barat-Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur). Surabaya: Disertasi S3, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Airlangga.

Kuswarno Engkus. 2008. Etnografi Komunikasi suatu Pengantar dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Widya Padjadjaran. Bandung

Manafe, Yermia, Djefri. 2013. Komunikasi Ritual Pada Pertanian Atoni Pah Meto(Studi Etnografi Komunikasi Tentang Budaya Bertani Atoni Pah Meto Di Oesena Timor Tengah Utara - Nusa Tenggara Timur). Bandung: Disertasi S3, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Padjadjaran.

Middelkoop. Pieter. 1938. “Iets over Sonba’I, het bekende vorstengeslacht op Timor (Something about Sonba’I, The wellknown royal house on Timor)”, Tijd. 78:392-509.

______. 1963. Headhunting in Timor and Its Historical Implications., Oceania Linguistic Monograph No. 8. Australia: University of Sidney.

______. 1968. Migrations of Timorese Groups and The Question of Atoni Kase Metan or Overseas Black Foreigners. International Archiv of Ethnographic, Vol. LI, Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Miall, Hugh. Oliver Rambsbotham and Tom Woodhouse, 2000. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Oxford: Polity Press.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhajir, Noeng. 1996. “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif”, Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Mulyana, Deddy, 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

, Deddy. 1995. Twenty Five Indonesians in Melbourne (Disertasi dalam rangka memperoleh Ph.D di Universitas Monash, Australia).

Parera. ADM. 1994. “Sejarah Pemerintahan Raja-Raja Timor: Suatu Kajian Peta Politik Pemerintahan Kerajaan-Kerajaan Di Timor Sebelum Kemerdekaan RI”. Gregor Neonbasu, (Ed.). Jakarta: Diterbikan atas kerja sama PT Yanense Mitra Sejati dengan Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Spradley, James. P. 1980. “Participant Observation”. Orlando, Florida: Macalester College.

Usfinit, Un Alexander. 2003. “Maubes Insana: Salah Satu Masyarakat di Timor dengan Struktur Adat yang Unik”. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius. Diterbitkan atas kerjasama dengan Yayasan Adikarya Ikapi dengan The Ford Foundation.

Whittaker, David J., 1999. Conflict and Reconciliation in the Contemporary World. Routledge




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i1.3229

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.