The Rationale for Reconstruction of Money Politics Crimes in the General Election

Handoko Alfiantoro, Abdul Maasba Magassing, M. Syukri Akub, Judhariksawan Judhariksawan

Abstract


The provision of necessities which were originally purely as a form of social solidarity to the poor or as souvenirs just to fulfill the appropriateness of eastern culture in visiting, when proven effective in gaining votes, became a new mode by candidates in approaching constituents, which such practice is commonly called with the practice of money politics. This research aims to find out and analyze the rationale for the reconstruction of money politics in the general election. The method used in this study is a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the rationale for the reconstruction of money politics in the general election is that giving something in the form of money or goods at the time of the election becomes a close causal relationship between the occurrence of corruption, both pre-gift and post-giving.


Keywords


Reconstruction; Money Politics Crimes; General Election

Full Text:

PDF

References


Black, H. (1990). Black's Law Dictionary: 8th Edition. St. Paul. Minn: West Publishing Co.

Burhanudin, M. (2013). Politik Uang dan Dinamika Elektoral di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Awal Interaksi Antara Party-ID dan Patron-Klien. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 10 (1).

Daryanto, T.(2019). Partai Advokasi: Menghapus Dominasi Uang dan Politik. Depok: Pustaka LP3ES.

Ibrahim, J. (2008). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2010). Buku Saku Memahami Gratifikasi. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2014). Buku Saku Memahami Gratifikasi. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.

Marzuki, P. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Mulyono, A. (2016). Pengaruh Aspek Kultur Hukum Terhadap Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Jurisprudentie, 3 (2).

Nasution, B.J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Pujiatmiko, S. (2020). Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilu dalam Teori dan Praktik. Tuban: Karya Litera Indonesia.

Roem, M. (1977). Memimpin adalah Menderita: Kesaksian Haji Agus Salim. Jurnal Prisma, 8.

Rohim. (2008). Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Depok: Pena Multimedia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i12.3141

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.