Analysis of Omnibus Law Creation Law: Scope of Labor

Prehantoro Prehantoro

Abstract


This type of research is normative legal research, namely research that puts law as a system of norms, namely about principles, norms, laws and regulations, court decisions, agreements and doctrines. Based on the explanation above, it can be concluded that omnibus law is a legal concept that focuses on simplifying the number of regulations because it revises and revokes many laws at once. Therefore, before the omnibus law concept is actually applied in forming regulations, the principles of participation, transparency, and accountability need to be put forward first. Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, which was designed with the aim of transforming the economy towards advanced Indonesia by 2045, in its Draft and Academic Papers encountered many problems. Especially in the Employment cluster, these problems are related to the reduced rights of workers/laborers. Although it’s undeniable that Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation has several positive sides such as providing job loss guarantees for workers/laborers after Termination of Employment, but in reality the positive side of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation is not commensurate with the number of problems that exist.


Keywords


Creation; Labor; Omnibus Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggono, Bayu Dwi. 2014. Asas Materi Muatan Yang Tepat Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang, Serta Akibat Hukumnya: Analisis Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Yang Dibentuk Pada Era Reformasi (1999-2012). Disertasi Doktor, Universitas Indonesia: Jakarta.

Ayu Taduri, Januari Nasya. 2021. “The Legal Certainty and Protection of Foreign Investment Againsts Investment Practices in Indonesia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.46286.

Dolot, Anna. 2020. “The Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Remote Work - an Employee Perspective.” E-Mentor.

Fernando, Zico Junius, Wiwit Pratiwi, and Yagie Sagita Putra. 2021. “Omnibus Law Sebuah Problematika Dan Paradigma Hukum Di Indonesia.” AL-IMARAH: Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam 6 (1).

FOREST, PG. 2020. “‘Citizens As Analysts’ Redux: Revisiting Aaron Wildavsky on Public Participation.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.159.

Gaffar, Salahuddin, Agus Mulya Karsona, Yani Pujiwati, and Indra Perwira. 2021. “The Concept of Procedural Law Regarding the Implementation of Collective Agreements with Legal Certainty in Termination of Employment in Indonesia.” Heliyon 7 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06690.

Garner, Bryan A. 2004. Black’s Law Dictionary, Eight Edition. St. Paul Minn: West Publishing Co.

Hage, Jaap. 2012. “The Method of a Truly Normative Legal Science.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599531.

Indonesia, Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan. 2019. Kajian Reformasi Regulasi Di Indonesia: Pokok Permasalahan Dan Strategi Penanganannya. Jakarta, PSHK.

Khozen, smail. 2021. “Questioning Open Governance Principle within the Law-Making Process of Omnibus Law.” SOSHUM : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora 11 (2): 143–54. https://doi.org/10.31940/SOSHUM.V11I2.2483.

Santosa, Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi, Kadek Agus Sudiarawan, and I Made Marta Wijaya. 2021. “The Employment Cluster of Omnibus Law: Embodiment the Concept of Nachtwakerstaat or Welfarestate?” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15 (2). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no2.2219.

Simonenko, V. V. 2021. “Specific Regulation of the Termination of the Employment Agreement on Remote Work: Problems in the Past and Estimation of the Present Times.” Rossijskoe Pravosudie 7 (June): 70–79. https://doi.org/10.37399/ISSN2072-909X.2021.7.70-79.

Susanti, Bivitri. n.d. “RKUHP: Periode Baru, Bahas Dengan Pendekatan Baru.”

Taufiq, Muchamad. 2021. “The CONSIDERING THE BASIC BENEFITS OF OMNIBUS LAW FOR PEOPLE.” Jurnal Dinamika HAM (Journal of Human Rights) 12 (2). https://doi.org/10.24123/jdh.v12i2.2953.

Waugh, Megan I, and Stuart N Hodkinson. 2021. “Examining the Effectiveness of Current Information Laws and Implementation Practices for Accountability of Outsourced Public Services.” Parliamentary Affairs 74 (2): 253–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/PA/GSAA001.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i10.3080

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.