Analysis of Interaction Jigsaw Learning Process on Geometry Material

Imam Pakhrurrozi, Imam Sujadi, Ikrar Pramudya


This study aims to determine the interaction between teachers and students that occur in the process of learning Mathematics with jigsaw model in junior high school in Surakarta using FIAC (Flanders Interaction Analysis Condition) analysis. This study includes qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this study are teachers and students of 8th grade of junior high school in Surakarta and students' learning achievement sheets. The object of research is the interaction of teachers and students in the learning of mathematics, including the sense of receiving, giving praise, how teacher teaches the material, how the teacher directs the students, how the teacher gives criticism, student responses, student speech initiative and the level of silence or crowd. Data collection methods used in this study are observation, interviews, and documentation. Data obtained in the form of qualitative data in the form of observation results of teacher and student interaction, interview transcript and documentation of teaching and learning activities. The data obtained were analyzed by FIAC. The result of the research shows that jigsaw learning process is: 1) the interaction between teacher and student in the learning of mathematics is multi direction. The research results are confirmed by the value of Teacher Response Ratio (RRG) that is equal to 44.48% and the value of Student Initiative Ratio (RIS) of 43.47%; 2) The learning done by the teacher is successful. The success of multi-direction learning is evidenced by the average score of the student achievement test of 78.30. The value is categorized into either category.


Interaction; Jigsaw Learning; FIAC

Full Text:



Attle, S and Parker, B. (2007). Cooperative Learning in a Competitive Environment: Classroom Applications. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 19(1): 77-83.

Chu, S. (2014). Aplication of the Jigsaw Cooperatif Learning Method in Economic Course. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research. 10(2): 166-172.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2005). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Rogers, J., & Yang, P. (1996). Test Wiseness: Its Nature and Application. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12: 247-259.

Gall, M.D; Gall, J. P. & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research. Boston: Pearson Education.

Ritzer, George dan Douglas J Goodman. (2009). “ Teori Sosiologi”. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana Zeitlin, Irving M. 1995. “Memahami Kembali Sosiologi”. Gadjah Mada University Press: Yogyakarta.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.