A Comparative Study of Post-Marriage Nationality of Women in Legal Systems of Different Countries

Nazanin Pourjabali, Najjad Ali Almasi


In the nineteenth century a school known as “The Unity System of Couples Nationality” stated the idea that women should acquire the nationality of their husbands after marriage. In other words, the nationality of men should be imposed on women. However, in the 20th century, a movement known as feminism emerged which led to the formation of a school named “System of Nationality Independence”. This school advocated the separation of marriage and nationality and believed that women’s nationality should not change following marriage. The aforementioned legal schools have had different manifestations in the positive laws of different countries and sometimes it is hard to classify them into a single legal school. The legal systems of countries can be classified into two groups: legal systems advocating the imposition of husbands’ nationality on wives; legal systems opposing the imposition of husbands’ nationality on wives.


nationality; marriage; legal systems

Full Text:



Al Kajbaf, H. (2010). Nationality in Iran and other countries. Jangal Press, pp. 188-189.

Arfania, B. (2012). Private International Law. Vol. 1, Behtab Press, 4th edition, p. 88.

Azimzadeh Ardebili, F.,Khosravi, L. (2009). A comparative study of women’s rights from the viewpoints of Islam and the West (4). Centre for Family and Women’s Affairs. Presidency Office, 1th edition, p. 86.

Badaqi, F. (2004). Marriage and nationality of Iranian women. Women’s Book, Tehran, Women’s Cultural-Social Council, no. 24, p. 129.

Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations, "Nationality of Married Women", New York, United Nations Publication, 2006

Ebadi, S. (2006). Women’s right in the Islamic Republic of Iran’s legislation. Ganj-e Danesh Press, 2nd edition, p. 163.

Golshanpazhuh, M. (2008). The guide to human rights in international communities (mechanisms and processes). Abrar Mo’aser Publications, 1th edition, p. 50.

Hemmat, M. (2011). Change of nationality due to marriage. Islamic Azad University, Research and Science Branch, pp. 120-121.

Imani, N. (2011). Feasibility study of the expansion of legal supports for the marriage of women with foreign men. Women’s Strategic Studies, Quarterly of the Cultural and Social Council for Women and Family. No. 54, 14th year, winter 2011, p. 113.

Kar,M. (1999). Eliminating the discrimination on women. Ghatreh Publications, 1th edition, p. 185.

Madani, J. (2008). Private International Law 1 and 2. Paydar Press, Tehran, 5th edition, p. 81.

Mehrpour, H. (2011). Internal Law System. Etela’at Publications, 4th edition, p. 445.

Nasiri, M. (2007). Private International Law. Vol. 1 and 2, Agah Publications, p. 55.

Nazif, M. (2009). Private International Law. Vol. 1, Dadgostar Press, Tehran, 1th edition, p. 65.

Raeesi, P. (2011). A comparative analysis of women’s nationality in the Iranian, French and English legal systems. University of Tehran, p. 40.

Saljuqi, M. (2009). Private International Law, vol. 1, Mizan Publications, 7th edition.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v2i2.3


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.