Analysis of the Center Point of Indonesia (CPI) Reclamation Policy of Makassar City in the Environmental Political Perspective

Suhardi Suhardi

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to analyze the impacts that arise from the CPI reclamation, viewed from the perspective of environmental politics. From an environmental perspective, the reclamation policy does not have a good impact according to its essence and purpose, it actually increases disaster risk for Makassar City, especially coastal areas, both land and sea. This research was conducted qualitatively in a case study of the CPI reclamation, by conducting in-depth interviews and field observations as well as extracting the necessary data from related sources. The CPI reclamation has attracted the attention of a number of NGOs that have formed an alliance to demand that the reclamation be stopped because it has damaged the surrounding environment and has caused economic and material harm to coastal communities. Fishermen and shellfish seekers totaling 43 heads of families who inhabit a land area of approximately 10 hectares, were evicted by the Southern Provincial Government for the construction of CPI reclamation. The sustainability of the CPI reclamation project is still reaping the pros and cons until now, especially the negative impacts that are generated are not only socio-economic problems but also have an impact on the environment. The reclamation policy actually has a negative impact on the environment, contrary to the essence of the policy itself which should bring goodness to life.


Keywords


Policy; CPI Reclamation; Environmental Politics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aspan, Z. (2017). Advokasi Litigasi Kasus Reklamasi Pantai Makassar (Perspektif Undang-Undang Lingkungan Hidup). Amanna Gappa, 19-24.

Connelly, J., Smith, G., Benson, D., & Saunders, C. (2012). Politics and the environment: from theory to practice. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Dobson, A., & Lucardie, P. (Eds.). (1995). The politics of nature: Explorations in green political theory. Psychology Press.

Dunn, W. N. (2000). Analisis Kebijakan Publik Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University

Dunn, W. N. (2003). Pengantar analisis kebijakan publik. repository.unsimar.ac.id

Rusdianto, E. (2015). Beginilah Kondisi Drainase dan Pesisir Makassar. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2015/03/22/beginilah-kondisi-drainase-dan-pesisir-makassar. Diakses 26 Juni 2019.

Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and their design. The theory of institutional design, 1(53), 9-53.

Heywood, (2014). Politik Edisi Keempat. Terj. Ahmad Lintang Lasuardi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Huda, M. C. (2013). Pengaturan Perizinan Reklamasi Pantai Terhadap Perlindungan Lingkungan Hidup. Perspektif, 18(2), 126-135.

Kamal, B. (2017). Konflik Kepentingan Perebutan Pesisir Kota Makassar dalam Pembangunan Center Point of Indonesia. The POLITICS: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 3(2), 83-93.

Paulson, S., Gezon, L. L., & Watts, M. (2003). Locating the political in political ecology: An introduction. Human organization, 62(3), 205-217.

Walhi Sulawesi Selatan (2016). Laporan Kasus Reklamasi Center Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Pesisir Kota Makassar. Walhi.

Walhi Sulawesi Selatan (2017). Kasus Proyek Reklamasi Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) Dampaknya di Pesisir Kota Makassar dan Takalar. Walhi.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i10.2985

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.