Legal Protection for Debitors Through Bankruptcy Concept
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explain the legal protection for debitors through bankruptcy concept based on Law no. 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK-PKPU). This research is a normative legal research with a statute approach, the case approach, historical approach, comparative approach, and the conseptual approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The analysis technique uses legal logic, legal interpretation teleologically, hermeneutics, grammatically, and systematically. The results of the study indicate that in UUK-PKPU only debtors who are insolvent can be declared bankrupt or apply for a PKPU. Bankruptcy applications can be submitted by the debtor himself or by the creditor. According to the legal principle, the applicant who submits the argument must prove the argument, then the applicant who proves the insolvency is the applicant. Essentially, bankruptcy in its application must be carried out fairly in the sense of paying attention to the interests of debtors and creditors in a balanced way. The idea of balance encourages an acknowledgment of the equality of the position of the individual with the community in common life.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amrullah, M. (2016). Azas Integritas dalam Sistem Hukum Kepailitan sebagaiSarana Hukum Menyelesaikan Masalah Utang Piutang secara Adil, Cepat, dan Efektif. Malang, Brawijaya University.
Anisah, S. (2008). Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Depok, Indonesia University.
Anisah, S. (2009). Studi Komparasi Terhadap Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor Dalam Hukum Kepailitan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 16, Special Edition, 30-50. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/3881/3457
Aprilla, A.P., Permadi, I., & Effendi, L. (2018). Status Hukum Hak Milik Atas Tanah Warga Negara Asing Dengan Meminjam Nama Warga Negara Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(1), 15-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i12018p015
Badrulzaman, M.D. (2006). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata Buku III Tentang Hukum Perikatan Dengan Penjelasan. Bandung, PT.Alumni.
Blandy, S.B.S. (2015). Researching Property Law, Palgrave Macmillan.
Damlah, J. (2017). Akibat Hukum Putusan Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Lex Crimen, 6(2), 91-98. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/15348/14896
David, L.K. (2005). Insolvency Law in East Asia. Roman Tomasic, Ashgate Publising Campany.
Fauzi, M. (2010). Menimbang Konstruksi Hukum Kepailitan Bank; Perspektif Nilai-nilai Dasar dan Tujuan Hukum (Law Construction of Bankruptcy; Basic Values and Orientation of Law Perspective). Risalah Hukum, 6(1), 1-8. https://e-journal.fh.unmul.ac.id/index.php/risalah/article/view/245/155
Hery. (2015). Analisis Laporan Keuangan: Pendekatan Rasio Keuangan. First Printed. Yogyakarta,Center For Academic Publishing Servise CAPS.
Irianto, C. (2015). Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaraan Utang (PKPU). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(3), 339-418. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.4.3.2015.399-418
Khairandy, R. (2004). Itikad baik dalam Kebebasan berkontrak. Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia.
Kusumohamidjojo, B. (2017). Teori Hukum Dilema antara Hukum dan Kekuasaan, Edisi 2, Bandung, Yrama Widya.
Mitchell, C. (2007). Interpratation of Contracts. Abingdon, Routledge-Cavendish.
Mubarok, M.W. (2015). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Kepailitan Pt. Prudential Life Assurance (Studi Putusan Nomor 13/Pailit/2004/PN.NIAGA/JKT.PST). Available at http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/64632 Accessedd at 23 March, 2021.
Nasution, B.J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung, Mandar Maju.
Prodjodikoro, W. (2011). Azas-Azas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung, Mandar Maju.
Rumadan, I. (2017). Peran Lembaga Peradilan Sebagai Institusi Penegak Hukum Dalam Menegakkan Keadilan Bagi Terwujudnya Perdamaian (Judicial Insttuton Role as Law Enforcement Insttuton Upholding Justce for Peace). Jurnal RECHTSVINDING: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(1), 69-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i1
Satrio, J. (2012). Wanprestasi menurut KUHPerdata, Doktrin, dan Yurisprudensi. First Printed. Bandung, PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.
Setiono, (2004). Rule Of Law (supremasi hukum). Surakarta, Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Shubhan, H. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. First Edition. Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Simamora, Y.G. (1993). Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Sebagai Bentuk Pelanggaran Terhadap Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak, Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, Vol. 8.
Simamora, Y.G. (1997). Pengujian Dan Kontrol Terhadap Penggunaan Perjanjian Standar, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 2(3).
Suhardana. (2008). Contract Drafting:Kerangka Dasar dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. Yogyakarta, Universitas Yogyakarta.
Syahrani, R. (2013). Seluk Beluk dan Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata. Bandung, PT Alumni.
Wijaya, A.A., Murniati, R., and Trijaya, M.W. (2019). Hak Eksekusi Kreditor Separatis terhadap Benda Agunan dalam Kepailitan. Pactum Law Journal, 2(3), 713-724. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/15062/1/1685-5414-1-PB.pdf
Zuaeha, M. (2016). Konsep Kepаilitаn yаng Memberikаn Perlindungаn Hukum Terhаdаp Debitor Perusаhааn Yаng Propektif. Malang, Brawijaya University.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i8.2953
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.