Development and Validation Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Instrument for Teacher Mathematics in Elementary School
Abstract
Measurement of teacher competence through TPACK is very important to do. However, the majority of the instruments used to measure TPACK for elementary school teachers are not yet in line with the needs of the 21st Century. This study aims to develop a TPACK instrument for elementary school teachers in a valid and reliable Mathematic lesson. This study uses the quantitative research. The study sample involved 1490 teacher in elementary school, grade IV, V, and VI teachers from state and private elementary schools with A level of accreditation, spread across fourteen sub-districts in the Kabupaten Bogor. Data analysis techniques use Winsteps 4.0.1. So that, overall, this instrument can be used to measure TPACK of elementary school teachers in the content of mathematics lessons. This instrument can be used to map teacher competencies based on TPACK values. Furthermore, if there are some weaknesses in the 7 aspects of the TPACK, policy makers can determine the follow-up that needs to be determined to further improve the competence of elementary school teachers. The dimensions that stand out in this research are lesson content, teaching approach, technology, pedagogy, content, and mathematics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Implications of two well-known models for instructional designers in distance education: Dick-carey versus Morrison-ross-kemp. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.13470
Ariani, D. N. (2015). Hubungan antara Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge dengan Technology Integration Self Efficacy Guru Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Muallimuna, 1(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v1i1.277
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI. Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI, 1–59.
Bambang Sumintono & Wahyu Widhiarso. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assesment Pendidikan (Pertama). Trim Komunikata.
Boone, W. J., & Noltemeyer, A. (2017). Rasch analysis: A primer for school psychology researchers and practitioners. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1416898
Caturiyati, K. H. dan. (2013). Validitas Konstruk (construct validity) dalam Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Non-Kognitif. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Das, S. W. H., Halik, A., Nasir, M., & Suredah, S. (2009). Pencapaian Kompetensi Guru Sekolah Dasar Negeri. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, 350–359.
Desstya, A. (2018). Validitas Reliabilitas Instrument Technologycal Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Tpack) Guru Sekolah Dasar Muatan Pelajaran Ipa. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Of Basic Education, 3(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.24269/ajbe.v3i1.1338
DiStefano, C., Greer, F. W., Kamphaus, R. W., & Brown, W. H. (2014). Using Rasch Rating Scale Methodology to Examine a Behavioral Screener for Preschoolers At Risk. Journal of Early Intervention, 36(3), 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815115573078
DiStefano, C., & Morgan, G. B. (2010). Evaluation of the BESS TRS-CA Using the Rasch Rating Scale Model. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(4), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021509
Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(7), 950–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the Fear Factor.
Gomez, L. E., Arias, B., Verdugo, M. Á., & Navas, P. (2012). An Outcomes-Based Assessment of Quality of Life in Social Services. Social Indicators Research, 106(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9794-9
Han, E. S., & goleman, daniel; boyatzis, Richard; Mckee, A. (2019). 済無No Title No Title. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Nomor 9).
Harris, J., Koehler, M., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Apa Itu Konten Pedagogis Teknologi. 9, 60–70.
Huberty, J., Vener, J., Gao, Y., Matthews, J. L., Ransdell, L., & Elavsky, S. (2013). Developing an instrument to measure physical activity related self-worth in women: Rasch analysis of the Women’s Physical Activity Self-Worth Inventory (WPASWI). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.009
Hy, E. D. W., Orks, I. T. W., & Tidak, A. (2015). Teknologi Digital dalam Pendidikan Matematika: Mengapa Berfungsi (Atau Tidak).
Jang, S. J., & Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers and Education, 59(2), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
Karami, H. (2015). Book review: Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Language Testing, 32(4), 545–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214567642
Koehler, M. J. (2006). Konten Pedagogis Teknologi Pengetahuan : Sebuah Kerangka Pengetahuan Guru. 108, 1017–1054.
Koehler, M. J., Michigan, U. N., Mishra, P., & Arizona, U. N. (2017). Apa Yang Terjadi Saat Guru Merancang Teknologi Pendidikan ? Perkembangan Pengetahuan Konten Pedagogis Teknologi.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M. H. (2015). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Pedagogical Improvement: Editorial for Special Issue on TPACK. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 459–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0241-6
Ling Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-Action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 78, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022
Maat, S. M., & Rosli, M. K. (2016). The Rasch Model Analysis for Statistical Anxiety Rating Scale (STARS). Creative Education, 07(18), 2820–2828. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.718261
Nasional, S., Guru, P. K., Ukg, M., Ptbb, J., & Uny, F. T. (2012). Seminar Nasional 2012 “Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru dalam Menghadapi UKG” Jurusan PTBB FT UNY, 15 Desember 2012 1. 1–11.
Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., & Barat, U. M. (2009). Standar TPACK Guru Matematika dan Model Pengembangan. 9, 4–24.
Perera, H. N., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Profiles of teacher personality and relations with teacher self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 120(September 2017), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.034
Pilihan, D. A. N., Untuk, G., & Learning, M. S. (2015). Perbandingan Akurasi Penggunaan Skala Likert Dan Pilihan Ganda Untuk Mengukur Self-Regulated Learning. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 45(2), 118670. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v45i2.7493
Propagation, W. (2018). Μ 2 , Ρ 2 Μ 1 , Ρ 1. May, 2–3.
Putrawangsa, S., & Hasanah, U. (2018). Integrasi Teknologi Digital Dalam Pembelajaran Di Era Industri 4.0 Kajian dari Perspektif Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Pendidikan, 16(1), 42–54.
Richardo, R. (2016). Program Guru Pembelajar: Upaya Peningkatan Guru Profesionalisme Guru Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, November, 777–785.
Sari, A. P. P., Amin, M., & Lukiati, B. (2017). Buku Ajar Bioteknologi Berbasis Bioinformatika Dengan Model ADDIE. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(6), 769.
Seol, H. (2016). Using the bootstrap method to evaluate the critical range of misfit for polytomous rasch fit statistics. Psychological Reports, 118(3), 937–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116649434
Shih, C. L., Chen, C. H., Sheu, C. F., Lang, H. C., & Hsieh, C. L. (2013). Validating and improving the reliability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using a multidimensional rasch model. Value in Health, 16(5), 848–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.05.004
Sinnema, C., Meyer, F., & Aitken, G. (2017). Capturing the Complex, Situated, and Active Nature of Teaching Through Inquiry-Oriented Standards for Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116668017
Sintawati, M., & Indriani, F. (2019). Pentingnya Literasi ICT Guru di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 417–422.
Sulaeman, E. (n.d.). THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE MIDDLE VALUE OF THE INDONESIAN VERSION OF EMOTIONAL LEARNING INSTRUMENT. 6(1), 26–46.
Sumintono, B. (2014). Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Makalah kuliah umum di jurusan statistika, ITS Surabaya, 21 November 2014, November 201, 1–9. http://deceng3.wordpress.com
Sumintono, B. (2016). Aplikasi pemodelan Rasch pada asesmen pendidikan: Implementasi penilaian formatif (Assessment for learning). Makalah dipresentasikan dalam Kuliah Umum pada Jurusan Statistika, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya, 17 Maret 2016., March, 1–19.
http://eprints.um.edu.my/15876/1/ITS_rasch_model_asesment_for_learning.pdf
Triyono. (2003). Teknik Sampling Dalam Pelaksanaan Penelitian. Info Kesehatan, 7(1), 64. https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/dcq8u/download
Wahyuningsih, S. A. (2020). Penggunaan Model Rasch Untuk Analisis Instrumen the Use of Rasch Model for Analyzing Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 45–50.
Wibisono, S. (2019). Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Validasi Instrumen Pengukuran Fundamentalisme Agama Bagi Responden Muslim. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I), 3(3). https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v3i3.10731
Xu, M., David, J. M., & Kim, S. H. (2018). Keempat Revolusi Industri : Peluang dan Tantangan. 9(2), 57–62.
Yu, C. H. (2012). A simple guide to Item Response Theory (IRT) and Rasch Modeling. 30. http://www.creative-wisdom.com/computer/sas/IRT.pdf
Zamzam, I., Mahdi, S. A., & Ansar, R. (2017). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban 1. 1–24.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i8.2951
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.