Position of Deed Made by a Retired Notary in Court Proceedings in Banda Aceh
Abstract
Article 65 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning Notarial Department states "Notary, Substitute Notary and Notary Acting Officer are responsible for any deed made even though the Notary Protocol has been submitted or transferred to the notary protocol depository." In practice, it often occurs when the Protocol Deed is transferred to the Notary protocol holder of the party harmed by the existence of the deed to a lawsuit involving a retired notary public. This is as happened in the case in the Banda Aceh District Court. This relates to the summoning of witnesses who must obtain approval from the Notary Honorary Assembly in accordance with Article 66 paragraph 1 of the UUJN. This research aims to explain the position of the Deed made by a retired Notary who is sued to the Court and the liability of the Notary Protocol Holder if the Deed of Protocol held in question in the Court and to know the need for approval from the Notary Honorary Assembly if the retired notary is called as a witness in a court case. The research method used is normative research method. The data used is primary data. The results showed that: A retired notary (werda) the position of the deed that he made as a deed of protocol submitted to the Notary protocol holder. If the deed of protocol is questioned to the court, then the retired notary is responsible for the deed he made. The notary of the Protocol holder cannot be held liable for the Deed of Protocol he holds if it is in question in the Court. If there is a problem with the deed then the responsible person remains the notary concerned and not the notary protocol holder. The summons of a retired Notary does not require permission from the Notary Honorary Assembly (MKN).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Habib Adjie, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik, Bandung, Refika Aditama, 2009.
Komar Andasasmita, Notaris I, Bandung: Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, 2010.
Shidarta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Grasindo, 2000
Anita Afriana, “Kedudukan Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pihak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Indonesia Terkait Akta Yang Dibuatnya”, Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Volume 1, Nomor 2, Mei 2020.
Anisah Aini Romadhon, “Peranan Saksi Instrumenter Dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Kerahasiaan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Notarii”, Tesis Program Magister Kenotariatan Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2018.
Cut Era Fitriyeni, “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Sebagai Bagian Dari Protokol Notaris”, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, No. 58, Th. XIV (Desember, 2012).
Dea Perika, “Fungsi Notaris Dalam Pemeriksaan Identitas Penghadap Terhadap Autentisitas Akta Dihubungkan Dengan Asas Kehati-Hatian”, Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum | Volume 18 Nomor 2
Endang Purwaningsih, ‘Penegakan Hukum Jabatan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Berdasarkan Pancasila Dalam Rangka Kepastian Hukum’ (2011) 2 Jurnal Adil.
Endah Pertiwi, “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Akibat Pembuatan Akta Nominee Yang Mengandung Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Para Pihak”, Jurnal IUS | Vol VI | Nomor 2 Agustus 2018.
Muhammad Haris,“Kewenangan Notaris sebagai Pejabat Lelang Kelas II dalam Memberikan Penyuluhan Hukum atas Akta Risalah Lelang yang Dibuatnya”, Jurnal Syariah: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Pemikiran, Vol 17, Nomor 1 Juni 2017.
Nur Aisah, “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Setelah Berakhir Masa Jabatannya Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh/Dihadapannya”, Tesis Program Magister Kenotariatan Pasca Sarjana Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2018.
Irawan Arif Firmansyah, “Peran Notaris Sebagai Saksi dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana”, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4 No. 3 September 2017.
Lidya Christina Wardhani, “Tanggung Jawab Notaris/PPAT terhadap Akta yang Dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan”, Jurnal Lex Renaissance No. 1 Vol. 2 Januari 2017.
Tri Yanty Sukanty Arkiang, “Kedudukan Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana”, Jurnal Keadilan Progresif Volume 197 2 Nomor 2 September 2011.
Whenahyu Teguh Puspa, “Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Kebenaran Akta Dibawah Tangan Yang
Dilegalisasi Oleh Notaris” Jurnal Repertorium Volume III No. 2 Juli-Desember 2016, hlm.157.
Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris juncto Undang- undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i7.2897
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.