The Existence of Universal Humanism in The Reform Era of Indonesian Literary Criticism

Imamah Fikriyati Azizah, Dwi Susanto, Istadiyantha Istadiyantha

Abstract


The aesthetic of universal humanism is a cultural production of power struggles in the arena of Indonesian literary criticism. The agent who played an important role in achieving universal humanism was the Cultural Manifest (Manikebu), which extended into the Jakarta Arts Council (JAC). This study highlights the reality of literary criticism in the reform era, without undermining the aesthetic history of universal humanism as a medium or discourse echoed by the Cultural Manifest group and succeeded after the collapse of the Old Order. JAC as an agent currently controls the arena of Indonesian literary criticism seeking to cultivate economic, social, cultural, and symbolic capital. These capitals are used as a tool in carrying out the practice of symbolic violence in the arena of literary criticism. This then it establishes a habitus which aimed at enacting the aesthetic standards of universal humanism literary criticism. The habitus space is seen through the contest and literary criticism class conducted by JAC. The contest initiates enactment on parties involved, both the contestant jury and/or supporters of JAC's literary criticism class, as well as participants who take part in the literary criticism contest.

Keywords


Aesthetic Criticism of Indonesian Literature; Capital; Cultural Manifest; Habitus, Jakarta Arts Council; Practices; Universal Humanism; and Symbolic Violence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Fayyadl, M. (2015). Kritik Sastra di Prancis. Poetika, 3 (2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v3i2.10439

Dubois, S., & François, P. (2013). Career Paths and Hierarchies in the Pure Pole of the Literary Field: The Case of Contemporary Poetry. Poetics, 41, 501–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.07.004

Faruk. (1997). Memasuki Dunia Imajiner: Soal Sastra Mutakhir dan Kritiknya. Humaniora, 4,10–21. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.1910

Faruk. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sastra: Sebuah Penjelajahan Awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Folch, M. (2013). Who Calls the Tune: Literary Criticism, Theatrocracy, and the Performance of Philosophy in Plato’s Laws. American Journal of Philology, 134, 557–600. https://www.academia.edu/8894357/Who_Calls_the_Tune_Literary_Criticism_Theatrocracy_and_the_Performance_of_Philosophy_in_Platos_Laws

Friedman, A., & Bernstein, J. H. (2017). Measures of greatness: A Lotkaian approach to literary authors using OCLC WorldCat. Library and Information Science Research, 39, 180–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.07.001

Herlambang, W. (2019). Kekerasan Budaya: Pasca 1965 Bagaimana Orde Baru Melegitimasi Anti-Komunisme Melalui Sastra dan Film. Tangerang Selatan: Marjin Kiri.

Kurniawan, E. (1999). Pramoedya Ananta Toer dan Sastra Realisme Sosialis. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Aksara Indonesia.

Morgan, B. (2017). The Outward Mind: Materialist Aesthetics in Victorian Science and Literature. Victorian Studies, 60 (3), 466–526. 10.7208/chicago/9780226457468.001.0001

Pouly, M. (2016). Playing Both Sides of the Field: The Anatomy of a “Quality” Bestseller. Poetics, 59, 20–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.02.002

Pradopo, R. D. (2013). Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik, dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ritzer, G, & Goodman, D. J. (2010). Sociological Theory. (Nurhadi, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana. (Original work published 2004).

Yudiono K.S. (2009). Pengkajian Kritik Sastra Indonesia. Kompas Gramedia, Jakarta.

Saidi, A. I. (2000). Kritik Sastra Indonesia Pokok-pokok yang Tak Kunjung Tercerahkan. Wacana, 2 (1), 120–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v2i1.275

Salihara. (2016). Percakapan dengan Goenawan Mohamad: “Berangkat dari Humanisme Universil”. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/KzNhvcyYNvY.

Santosa, P. (2017). Kondisi Kritik Sastra Indonesia Seabad H.B.Jassin. Kandai, 13 (1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i1.94

Sapiro, G. (2016). The Metamorphosis of Modes of Consecration in the Literary Field: Academies, Literary Prizes, Festivals. Poetics, 59, 5–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.01.003

Satrya, H.D.D. (2015). Arena (Kritik) Sastra Indonesia: Studi Kasus pada Jurnal Poetika FIB Universitas Gadjah Mada. Poetika, 3 (2), 132–142. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/poetika/article/view/10440/7884

Schur, R. (2018). Haunt or Home? Ethos and Africa American

Literature. Humanities, 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/h7030080

Situmorang, S. (2018) Politik Sastra. Yogyakarta: Sic.

Susanto, D. (2016). Polarisasi Kritik Sastra Indonesia Periode 1950–1965. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Sastra dan Politik Partisan (pp. 102–113). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Susanto, D. (2018). Lekra, Lesbumi, Manifes Kebudayaan: Sejarah Sastra Indonesia Periode 1950–1965. Yogyakarta: Caps.

Zurmailis, & Faruk. (2017). Doksa, Kekerasan Simbolik dan Habitus yang Ditumpangi dalam Konstruksi Kebudayaan di Dewan Kesenian Jakarta. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, I (1), 44-72. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2017.01103




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i11.2797

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.