The Role of Training Satisfaction and Work Engagement on Employee’s OCB
Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of training satisfaction on work engagement and employee’s OCB in government services. Training satisfaction is necessary since employees do not simply follow the training provided by the organization, but how they like training so that successful training can encourage work engagement and extra behavior at work. In this study, there were 288 questionnaires distributed to employees in this field. The data obtained were analyzed using the Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results showed a positive effect of training satisfaction on Work Engagement (WE) and OCB. Employees with high training satisfaction generate professionalism, passion and dedication in service to the community and create caring behavior within the team. In addition, organizations are advised to further improve the quality of training for employees so that training satisfaction is met. Importantly, organizations also need to perform employee rotation, provide awards for outstanding employees, provide incentives, and other policies that can increase employee productivity for organizational development.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, K. (2011). The Association between Training and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Digital World. Communications of the IBIMA, 2011, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5171/2011.448699
Ahmad, M. I. U. H. Y. A. F. M. (2016). The Relationship between Charismatic Leadership, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Job Responsibilities. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research.
Ahmed, N. O. A. (2016). Impact of human resource management practices on organizational citizenship behavior: An empirical investigation from banking sector of Sudan. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), 964–973.
Artiningrum, B., & Satrya, A. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Career Management, Training Satisfaction, Pay Satisfaction Terhadap Turnover Intention dan Peran Mediasi Organizational Engagement Pada Karyawan Sektor Perbankan. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 14(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.29259/jmbs.v14i3.3992
Babcock-Roberson, M. E., & Strickland, O. J. (2010a). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 144(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223981003648336
Babcock-Roberson, M. E., & Strickland, O. J. (2010b). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 144(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223981003648336
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003). Counternormative impression management, likeability, and performance ratings: The use of intimidation in an organizational setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.185
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
Cirino, P. T., Miciak, J., Gerst, E., Barnes, M. A., Vaughn, S., Child, A., & Huston-Warren, E. (2017). Executive Function, Self-Regulated Learning, and Reading Comprehension: A Training Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415618497
Dartey-Baah, K., Anlesinya, A., & Lamptey, Y. (2019). Leadership behaviors and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of job involvement. International Journal of Business, 24(1), 74–95.
Fajar, A. P., & Soeling, P. D. (2017). The Effect of HRM Practices on Employee Organizational Citizenship Behavior in ICT Companies. 167, 282–294. https://doi.org/10.2991/icaspgs-icbap-17.2017.11
Farid, T., Iqbal, S., Ma, J., Castro-González, S., Khattak, A., & Khan, M. K. (2019). Employees’ perceptions of CSR, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating effects of organizational justice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101731
Fletcher, L. (2015). Training perceptions, engagement, and performance: Comparing work engagement and personal role engagement. 8868(October). https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1067855
Fletcher, L., & Robinson, D. (2016). What’s the Point? The importance of meaningful work. IES Perspectives on HR 2016.
Gaa, S. M. (2010). An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship.
Green, F., Felstead, A., Gallie, D., Inanc, H., & Jewson, N. (2013). What Has Been Happening to the Training of Workers in Britain?
Guan, X., & Frenkel, S. (2018a). How HR practice, work engagement and job crafting influence employee performance. Chinese Management Studies, 12(3), 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-11-2017-0328
Guan, X., & Frenkel, S. (2018b). How perceptions of training impact employee performance: Evidence from two Chinese manufacturing firms. Personnel Review, 48(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2017-0141
Hassan Zarei Matin, G. J. and F. A. (2010). A comprehensive model for development of organizational citizenship behaviors. African Journal of Business Management. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm11.3044
Jaworski, C., Ravichandran, S., Karpinski, A. C., & Singh, S. (2018). The effects of training satisfaction, employee benefits, and incentives on part-time employees’ commitment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 74(February), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.02.011
Jha, J. K., Pandey, J., & Varkkey, B. (2019). Examining the role of perceived investment in employees’ development on work-engagement of liquid knowledge workers: Moderating effects of psychological contract. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 12(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-08-2017-0026
Memon, M. A., Sallaeh, R., Baharom, M. N. R., Md Nordin, S., & Ting, H. (2017). The relationship between training satisfaction, organisational citizenship behaviour, and turnover intention. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 4(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2017-0025
Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., & Baharom, M. N. R. (2016). The link between training satisfaction, work engagement and turnover intention. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(6), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2015-0077
Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Mirza, M. Z., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Ahmad, M. S., & Tariq, A. (2020). Satisfaction matters: The relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2018-0127
Nik Nazli, N. N. N., & Sheikh Khairudin, S. M. H. (2018). The factors that influence transfer of training and its effect on organizational citizenship behaviour: Evidence from Malaysia civil defence force. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-09-2017-0080
Nikolett, V., & Christina Nawangsari, L. (2019). Impact of Human Resource Management Practices: Factors Influencing Organizational Citizenship Behaviour at Kelapa Gading Mall. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 9(2), p8628. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.9.02.2019.p8628
Organ, D. W. (1988). A Restatement of the Satisfaction-Performance Hypothesis. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400405
Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999496378729
Özduran, A., & Tanova, C. (2017). Coaching and employee organizational citizenship behaviours: The role of procedural justice climate. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.004
Parker, S. K., & Griffin, M. A. (2011). Understanding active psychological states: Embedding engagement in a wider nomological net and closer attention to performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.532869
Prabandari, A., & Riani, A. L. (2018). The Effect of Transformational Leadership and Work Motivation on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Does Work Engagement Matter? Sebelas Maret Business Review, 2(2), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.20961/smbr.v2i2.16792
Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
Rubel, Md., & Rahman, Md. H. A. (2018). Effect of Training and Development on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB): An Evidence from Private Commercial Banks in Bangladesh. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: A Administration and Management, 18(8), 1–11.
Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2018). Socialization resources theory and newcomers’ work engagement. Career Development International. https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-12-2016-0214
Schmidt, S. W. (2010). The Relationship between Job Training and Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 1(2), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/javet.2010040103
Simon L, Albrecth., Arnold B, Bakker., Jamie A, Gruman., William H, M., & Alan M, Saks. (2015). Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-09-2015-0031
Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2014). Multiple dimensions of human resource development and organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1933
Thomas, B., & Ogan, D. (1983). Austrian activist discusses capitalistic failure. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587–595.
Weng, L. C. (2014). Improving employee job performance through ethical leadership and “Guanxi": The moderation effects of supervisor-subordinate guanxi differentiation. Asia Pacific Management Review, 19(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.6126/APMR.2014.19.3.06
Zhang, X. A., Li, N., & Brad Harris, T. (2015). Putting non-work ties to work: The case of guanxi in supervisor-subordinate relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.008
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i4.2439
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.