Implementation of Fictitious Positive Decision Case Settlement at Administrative Courts

Edi Rohaedi, Hasan Basri


The enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, has given birth to a new paradigm related to silence or neglect of an application to obtain a ruling or a decision from a State Administration official becomes positive, meaning that every application for a State Administrative Decree that is Not followed up and/or ignored by State Administration officials are considered legally granted, as confirmed in the provisions of Article 53 paragraph (3) of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. According to the principle of a fictitious positive decision, if the State Administration Agency or Official does not issue the requested decision, while the predetermined period has passed, it is legally deemed to have issued a decision granting the application (a fictitious positive decision). At the level of implementation at the Administrative Court, the procedure for the Fictitious Positive Application has been regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 8 of 2017, concerning Guidelines for Procedures to Obtain Decisions on Acceptance of Applications to Obtain Decisions and / or Actions of Government Agencies or Officials. This Court Regulation number 8 is an amendment and refinement of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for Procedures to Obtain Decisions on Acceptance of Applications to Obtain Decision and/or Actions from Government Body or Officials.


Implementation; Fictitious Positive; Administrative Courts

Full Text:



Adji, O. S. (1980). Peradilan Bebas: Negara Hukum [Free Justice: The State of Law]. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ahmad. (2017). Konsep Fiktif Positif: Penerapannya Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara [Fictitious positive Concept: Its Application in Administrative Courts]. Jurnal Hukum Republik, 5(2).

Fakrulloh, Z. A. (2015). Tindakan Hukum Bagi Aparatur Penyelenggara Pemerintahan [Legal Actions for Government Administrators]. 62th National Seminar of IKAHI, Jakarta, March 26.

Hamzah, M. G. (2016). Paradigma Baru Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan kaitannya dengan Perkembangan Hukum Acara Peratun [New Paradigm of Government Administration Based on the Government Administration Law in relation to the Development of Administrative Procedure Law]. Paper presented on One-day Seminar on 26th Anniversary of Administrative Court. Jakarta.

Heriyanto, B. (2019). Problematika Peyelesaian Perkara “Fiktif Positif” di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara [Problems in the Settlement of “Fictitious Positive” Cases at Administrative Courts]. Jurnal Pakuan Law Review, 5(1).

Hadjon, P. M., Martosoeignjo, R. S. S., Basah, S., Manan, B., Marzuci, H. M. L., Berge, T., Buuren, P. J. J. V., and Stroink, F. A. M. (1999). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara [Introduction to The Indonesian Administration Law]. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Ridwan. (2010). Hukum Administrasi Negara [State Administrative Law]. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Simanjuntak, E. Perkara Fiktif Positif dan Permasalah Hukumnya [Fictious Proceedings and Its Legal Problem]. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 6(3), 2017.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.