The Influence of Learning Organization on Teacher’s Job Performance

Yulita Pujilestari

Abstract


This study aims to find efforts to improve teacher performance at Public Junior High Schools in South Tangerang City by examining the relationship between learning organizations, examining and developing the strengths of the relationship/influence between these variables, as follows: The relationship between learning organization with teacher performance, the relationship between learning organization and teacher performance. The quantitative method is the research method used. Based on the results of the multiple regression test (Ry (1,2)), it shows that the value of Ry (1,2) is 14.65, which means that the Learning Organization variable has a positive effect on the performance of teachers in SMP N Kota Tanggerang Selatan in the 2020/2021 school year. Based on the results of the F test, it was obtained that the Fcount value was 2615.3. When compared with the Ftable value of 0.1648 at the 5% significance level, then Fcount> Ftable (2615.3> 0.16), so this value is significant. Based on SPSS calculations, the value of the coefficient of determination obtained is 0.874. This shows that 87.4% of organizational learning, the remaining 12.6% is due to other factors not examined.


Keywords


Learning Organization; Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Ilmiah. Rineka cipta, Jakarta.

Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 10th Edition. Kogan Page Limited, London and Philadelphia.

Azwar, S. (2010). Metodelogi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design, Tenth Edition. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, USA.

Direktorat Sekolah Lanjutan Pertama. (2001). Bekerja Dengan Guru. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Jakarta.

Direktorat Sekolah Lanjutan Pertama. (2001). Pengantar Program Pelatihan. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Jakarta.

Getut Pramesti. (2006). Panduan Lengkap SPSS 13.0 dalam Mengolah Data Statistik. Gramedia, Jakarta.

Hasbullah, (2006). Otonomi Pendidikan (Kebijakan Otonomi Daerah dan Implikasinya terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Handoko, Martin. (1994). Motivasi untuk Pembinaan Organisasi. IPPM dan PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressendo. Jakarta.

Radjab, E., & Jam’an, A. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Lembaga Perpustakaan dan Penerbitan Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.

Riduwan. (2004). Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Alfabeta, Bandung,

Riduwan. (2005). Rumus dan Data dalam Aplikasi Statitiska. Alfabeta, Bandung,

Sugiyono. (2007). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung.

S, Ambarwati. (2001). Analisa Faktor- Faktor yang mempengaruhi Produktivitas Guru studi kasus SLTP Negeri 3 Ciputat. Program Pasca Sarjana UNKRIS Jakarta

Stanislaus S. Uyanto, (2009). Pedoman Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Soekarto Indrafachrudi, (1994). Mengantar Bagaimana Memimpin Sekolah Yang Baik. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia

Syafrudin Nurdin (2005). Guru Profesional & Implementasi Kurikulum. Jakarta: Quantum Teaching.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i10.2108

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.