The Customary Village Hegemony in Bali Towards Minority Groups

Paskalis Nyoman Widastra, Anak Agung Ngurah Anom Kumbara, Anak Agung Bagus Wirawan, I Gede Mudana

Abstract


For the Balinese, customary villages are social realities that are accepted as given. It exists as a social institution that competes with existing institutions, especially government agencies such as the service village. Its existence is only felt when it clashes with rights that intersect with heterogeneous community life in ethnicity and religion. In this study, the customary village is understood as an important institution that must be given space because of the history and also the role that has been played in maintaining the security and comfort of Bali. But in the perspective of minority groups, its presence becomes a hegemonic institution that threatens the diversity of Balinese society.Through a deconstruction approach, customary villages in Bali Province Regulation No. 4 of 2019, is expected to continue to provide benefits to build togetherness in plurality.


Keywords


Community; Plurality; Customary Village; Hegemonic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atmadja, Nengah Bawa. 2010. Ajeg Bali: Gerakan, Identitas Kultural, dan Globalisasi. Yogyakarta: LkiS.

Kymlicka, Will. 2002. Kewargaan Multikultural.Jakarta: PT Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia.

Mashad, Dhurorudin. 2014. Muslim Bali: Mencari Kembali Harmoni yang Hilang. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Patria, Nezar & Arief, Andi. 2009. Antonio Gramsci Negara & Hegemoni. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Suardika, Pasek. 2006. Memahami Bali: Kebanggaan di Balik Kegundahan. Denpasar: Bali Aga.

Sudantra, I Ketut & Parwata, AAGede Oka. 2010. Wicara lan Pamidanda: Pemberdayaan Desa Pakraman dalam Penyelesaian Perkara di Luar Pengadilan. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Sudarmanto, JB. 1987. Agama dan Ideologi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Surpha, I Wy. 1995. Eksistensi Desa Adat di Bali: Dengan diundangkannya Undang-Undang No. 5 TH. 1979 (Tentang Pemerintahan Desa). Denpasar: Upada Sastra.

Supriyoko, Ki. 2005.Pendidikan Multikultural dan Revitalisasi Hkum Adat dalam Perspektif Sejarah. Jakarta: CV. Karya Agung.

Suryawan, I Ngurah. 2012. Sisi Dibalik Bali: Politik Identitas, Kekerasan dan Interkoneksi Global. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Suseno, Franz Magnis. 2001. Pemikiran Karl Marx, Dari Sosialisme Utopis ke Perselisihan Revisionisme. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

............, Ajeg Bali Sebuah Cita-Cita. 2004. Denpasar: Bali Post.

..........., Jurnal Kajian Hindu, Budaya dan Pembangunan. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Satya Dharma. Singara: Vol. 6. No. 1. Maret – Oktober 1999.

..........., Journal of Urban Sociology/Volume 2 / no. 1 / April 2019.

..........., Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali No. 3 Tahun 2001 Tentang Desa Pekraman.

..........., Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali No. 3 Tahun 2003 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali No. 3 Tahun 2001 Tentang Desa Pekraman.

..........., Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali No. 4 Tahun 2019 Tentang Desa Adat Di Bali.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i7.1866

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.