Agency Valency of Voice Forms of the State Verbs (On the Material of the Uzbek Language)

Rasulov Ravshankhodja

Abstract


The article is devoted to the agent valence of voice forms of state verbs. It should be noted that, the expression of the relationship of movement, the state directed to the subject and object, is one of the main and important functions of the semantics of the verb. Voices totally cover the verbs. The verbs of state in the Uzbek language in their extra-linguistic substratum express certain processes connection with nature and society, flora and fauna, biology, physiology and psychology of human being. 

State verbs in the sentences are realized in the active, reflexive, compulsive, passive and mutual voices. State verbs with integral seme «duration», «result of movement», «execution», «movement», «skill», «imagery», «biological», «physiological» and «psychic» – are realized in speech mostly in the active voice. The agent of this verbs finds expression in the character of the object. The agent of some state verbs with the integral seme «result of movement», «execution», «imagery», «physiological» and «psychic» do not appear as functions of the object in sentence. Agent's non-objectivity, but only its subjectivity, follows from the transitivity of certain state verbs. The agent of some transitive state verbs with the integral seme «execution» and «psychic», even though they have own object, they are not only the producer (source) of the state, but also the object of the produced state. The possibility of combining state verbs with a direct object, that means, their transitiveness deserves special attention. State verbs with the integral seme «execution», «physiological» and «psychic» are realized in the sentence in a reflexive voice. Agent is an object in all cases. Verbs with the integral seme «duration», «result of movement», «movement», «biological», «physiological» and «psychic» are realized in speech in a compulsory voice. Agent here is not considered an object. State verbs with an integral seme «result of movement», «execution» and «movement» in a passive voice form have an agent valence. Here is shown the relationship object with state, which is the main, the most important, while agent is in secondary pose. The activity of the last one is weakening. This is the essence of the passive voice. State verbs with an integral seme «duration», «execution», «skill», «physiological» and «psychic» are realized in constructions in a mutual voice. The agent is revealed in the nature of the object.


Keywords


Agent; Valence; Verb; State Verbs; Integral Seme; Object; Voices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Look at Ivanov S.N. About voice category with suffix '-gan' in Uzbek language. «Questions of Linguistic knowledge», 1957. № 2; Ivanov S.N. Notes about Uzbek language syntax. – L. 1959; Martinov V.V. Category of language. – M.,1982. p.111; Ivanova I. P., Burlakova V.V., Pocheptsov G.G. Theoretical grammar of modern English. – M. 1981. p.74.

«Russian grammar», Volume 1. M. 1980. p.614.

That book, p.613.

That book, p.614: «The modern Russian Language», Volume 2. M. 1981. p.184.

Look at Tursunov U., Muxtorov J., Rahmatullayev Sh. Hozirgi o’zbek adabiy tili. – T. 1975. 182-b.

Hojiyev A. Fe’l. – Toshkent, 1973. 91-b.

Hojiyev A. the work shown above. p.93; Nigmatov Kh.G. Voices of verb in east-turic languages in 11th - 12th century. «Sovet Turkology», 1973. № 1. p.49.

Look at G’ulomov A.G’. Fe’l. – Toshkent, 1954. 59-b; Mirtojiyev M. Nisbat kategoriyalari semantikasi va ular formantlari genezisi. O’timsizlik va o’zlik nisbati. – «O’zbek tili va adabiyoti», 1983. № 2. 33-b.

Look at Kononov A.N. The grammar of modern Uzbek language. – M. L. 1960. p.193; Hojiyev A. the work shown above, p.96; Tursunov U., Muxtorov J., Rahmatullayev Sh. the work shown above. p.186; Nigmatov Kh.G. the work shown above, p.56.

Look at Popov A. Comparative syntax in nominative, vocative, accusative cases «Philological notes», № 4-5. 1879; № 1,2,3,4,5. 1880; G’ulomov A.G’. the work shown above. p.58; Hojiyev A. the work shown above. p.99-100; Shubik S.A. «Structure and huge of sentence and word combination in Indian-Europe languages». – L. 1981. p.78: «Typology of passive construction. Diathesis and voices» L.,1974: Nigmatov Kh.G. Salkalamanadze A.A. Semantics of syntactic group of verbs and meaning voice affixes in Uzbek language. – «Sovet Turkology», 1979. № 3. p.54.

Shubik S.A. the work shown above, p.76; Ivanov S.N. «Ancestors tree of Turkic» Abul-Gazikhan’s grammatical notes. (Noun and verb. Grammatical category) – Таshkent,1969. p.126; Nigmatov Kh.G. the work shown above, p.54-55.

Look at Ivanov S.N. the work shown above, p.125; Ivanova I. P., Burlakova V.V., Pocheptsov G.G. the work shown above, p.75; Aristova E.B Category of subject and agentive syntax semes in modern English language. – At book.: Category of subject and object in various type of languages. – L. 1982. p. 46; Paducheva Y.V. About semantic of syntax. – M. 1974. p.217.

Look at Nigmatov Kh.G. the work shown above, p.55; Sherbak A.M. Grammatical notes about language of Turkic topics in 10th – 12th century in Eastern Turkistan. – M. L. 1961. p.167.

Look at Khrokovskiy B.S. Diathesis and reference. (for problem about interrelation of active, passive, reflexive and reciprocal construction) Sourcebook «Voice construction in variously constructed languages» – L. 1981. p.5 and next page.

Kononov A.N. the work shown above, p.188; look also Akhmanova O.S. Dictionary of linguistics terminology. – M. 1966. p.74.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i7.1854

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.