The Meaning of Indigenous Rights in Fidusian Guarantee in the Perspective of Law Number 42 of 1999 Concerning Fidusian Guarantee

Rahmat Datau, Abdul Rachmad Budiono, Iwan Permadi, Siti Hamidah


The purpose of this article is to discuss the meaning of material rights in fiduciary security in the perspective of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security. The research method used is document review with the Statute Approach approach to fiduciary legislation as primary legal material, as well as various secondary legal materials such as the results of fiduciary scientific studies and literature reference materials about fiduciary. The analysis used is Content Analysis of articles related to fiduciary law. The results showed that the meaning of property rights in nature is always attached to the owner. On the other hand, according to customary law, the meaning of property rights is essentially communal/collective (family/community) as the basis for their rights, both for movable or immovable objects in their possession. Essentially fiduciary property rights are handed over from the debtor's hands to the creditor, with a belief that the property rights will be handed over again if the debtor has paid off his debts, but in the process of surrender, control and his debts often cause legal problems, even though the Fiduciary Guarantee Institute has been formed. The conclusion that the meaning of material rights in fiduciary security lies in the matter of 'Delivery' and 'Mastery' of the items guaranteed.


Material Rights; Fiduciary Security; Law

Full Text:



de Winter, L. I. (1964). Dwingend recht bij internationale overeenkomsten. Netherlands International Law Review, 11(4), 329-365.

Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 57.

Martin, R. B. (2018). Aspek Hukum Pidana Dalam Peralihan Obyek Fidusia (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 205/Pid. sus/2015/PN. Bgr). Thesis, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya.

Moch. Isnaeni, . 2016, Hukum Benda Dalam Burgelljk Wetboek. PT. Revka Petra Media

Mumek, R. A. (2017). Hak-Hak Kebendaan Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata. Lex Administratum, 5(2).

Pai, V. R. (2014). Kedudukan Penerima Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitor Yang Dinyatakan Pailit. Lex Privatum, 2(2).

Rachmadi Usman, 2011, Hukum Kebendaan, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, hlm 283

Retnowati, T., & Markum, M. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Penerima Fidusia Yang Kemudian Dirampas Untuk Negara Dalam Kasus Illegal Logging. Sapientia Et Virtus, 2(1), 53-67.

Satrio, J. (1996). Hukum Jaminan Hak-Hak Kebendaan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Usanti, T. P. (2012). Lahirnya Hak Kebendaan. Perspektif, 17(1), 44-53.

Widjaja, E. K., & Putra, W. T. (2019). Karakteristik Hak Kebendaan Pada Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Benda Persediaan. Jurnal Mercatoria, 12(1), 14-28.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.