The Effectiveness of Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards in the Alternative Dispute Resolution Regime

Madah Saskia, Idrus Abdullah, Hayyanul Haq

Abstract


The aim of this research is to create a more accommodating arbitration model law by measuring the effectivity of international arbitration award implementation in accordance with UU No. 30/1999 regarding Arbitration and ADR law in international business dispute. The study analyzes the enforcement of international arbitration award implementation in relation to fairness and legal certainty. The research method is normative empirical, using statutes, conceptual, cases and sociological approaches. The technique of data gathering was carried on by observation, interview and library research.  The conclusion of this research is that the implementation of international arbitral awards is still not effective due to normative barriers from the law itself, as well as institutional, support infrastructures and human resources barrier. Steps need to be taken to reinforce the implementation of the arbitration awards in relation to create legal certainty in a normative sense.

Keywords


International Business Disputes; International Arbitration; Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Law No. 30/1999, UNCITRAL Model Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

A. Madjedi Hasan, Kontrak Minyak dan Gas Bumi Berazas Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum, PT Fikahati Aneska, Jakarta, 2008

Charles J. Moxley Jr., “Selecting the Ideal Arbitrator”, dalam American Arbitration Association, Handbook on Arbitration Practice, JurisNet LLC, New York, 2010

Eman Suparman, Arbitrase & Dilema Penegakan Keadilan, Fikahati Aneska, Jakarta, 2012

Erman Rajagukguk, Arbitrase Dalam Putusan Pengadilan, Cetakan ke dua, Chandra Pratama, Jakarta, 2001

Gaitis, James.M (eds.), The College of Commercial Arbitrators: Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration, Fourth Edition, Juris Net, LLC, New York, 2017

Huala Adolf, Arbitrase Komersial Internasional, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke tiga, PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2002

Huala Adolf, Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional, Cetakan kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006

M. Husseyn Umar, A Brief on Arbitration in Indonesia, Fikahati Aneska & BANI, Jakarta, 2015

M. Yahya Harahap, Arbitrase, Edisi kedua, Cetakan ke empat, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006

Priyatna Abdurrasyid, Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) (Arbitration-Alternative Dispute Resolution-ADR), Suatu Pengantar, Fikahati Aneska, Jakarta, 2002

Salim HS & Erlies Septiani Nurbani, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi, Cetakan ke tiga, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2014

Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Raja Persada, Jakarta, 2008

Idris et al (eds), Penemuan hukum nasional dan internasional, Dalam rangka Purnabakti Prof. Dr. Yudha Bhakti, S.H., M.H., Cetakan kesatu, Fikahati Aneska & Bagian Hukum Internasional FH Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, Jakarta, 2012

Journal

Andriani Nurdin, “Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional (Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards)”, makalah disampaikan dalam IARBI-BANI One Day Seminar Is Indonesian Arbitration Law Friendly to Business?, di Jakarta, 2 Oktober 2013

Huala Adolf, “BANI Arbitration Center (Member Updates and Collaboration Perspectives)” makalah dalam “The Asia-Pacific Regional Arbitration Group Conference 2016” di Bali, 6-8 Oktober 2016

João Ribeiro-Bidaoui, “An Introduction to UNCITRAL Texts to Arbitration”, makalah disampaikan pada “BANI Internasional Seminar on Indonesia and The Development of International Arbitration”, di Jakarta, 28 November 2017

Mohamed Idwan Ganie, pada Roadshow SIAC New Rules 2016 di Jakarta, 16 November 2016

Mutiara Hikmah, “Arbitrase dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia”, makalah dalam Seminar BANI tentang Arbitrase Internasional dan Investasi, Jakarta, 19 Desember 2016

N. Krisnawenda, “Hibridisasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Arbitrase dalam Rangka Mencapai Kepastian Hukum”, Ringkasan Disertasi, Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, 2011

Internet

Frans Hendra Winarta dalam Pleno Kamar 2016: Menuntun Kembali pada Esensi Arbitrase, Hukum Online, 24 Februari 2017, diakses dari http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt58afcf5929dea/menuntun-kembali-pada-esensi-arbitrase pada 17 Agustus 2017

Hayyan ul Haq, “Creating Appropriate Legal Framework in the Utilization of Intellectual Property Products”, Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology Vol.9, No.2 (2014), diakses dari https://www.neliti.com/publications/28842/creating-appropriate-legal-framework-in-the-utilization-of-intellectual-property pada 18 Juli 2018

Huala Adolf, “Improving the Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards in ASEAN Countries”, ASEAN Law Association, 10th General Assembly, diakses dari http://aseanlawassociation.org/10GAdocs/Indonesia6.pdf pada 30 Juli 2017

Kementrian Luar Negeri Indonesia, “Indonesia Terpilih Kembali sebagai Anggota UNCITRAL periode 2019-2025, 18 Desember 2018, diakses dari https://www.kemlu.go.id/id/berita/berita-perwakilan/Pages/Indonesia-Terpilih-Kembali-sebagai-Anggota-UNCITRAL-periode-2019-2025.aspx pada 20 Desember 2018

PT Pertamina http://www.pertamina.com/media/970d8f0c-d0a5-4d95-84b2-9fff5f268f09/LKFS%20Pertamina%2031%20Dec%202014_2013%20FINAL.PDF

S. Saba, Integrating Gandhian Conflict Resolution Techniques in Legal Studies: An Indispensable Path for Legal Professionals, International Journal of Peace, Education and Development, 7(1): 21-24, June 2019 Renu Publishers, accessed from https://renupublishers.com/images/article/157726087605.pdf on 20 Februari 2020

Regulations

UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, United Nations, 1994

Undang Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999, tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Others

International Chamber of Commerce, Arbitration and ADR Rules, International Chamber of Commerce, Perancis, 2011

International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration, Partial Award on Case No.14387/JB/JEM PT Lirik Petroleum vs (1) PT Pertamina (Persero), (2) PT Pertamina EP, 22 September 2008

International Chamber of Commerce Court of Arbitration, Final Award on Case No.14387/JB/JEM PT Lirik Petroleum vs (1) PT Pertamina (Persero), (2) PT Pertamina EP, 27 February 2009

LAPSPI, Work Plan and Budget for 2020 Alternative Institutions for Indonesian Banking Dispute Resolution, Jakarta, 2019

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Blueprint for Judicial Reform, 2010-2035, Jakarta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i9.1789

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.