Analysis of Student Interpersonal Intelligence in Mathematics Learning: Case Study Junior High School State (SMP N) in Sukoharjo
Abstract
Interpersonal intelligence is one of 8 Gardner's intelligences. This intelligence is the ability to assess and understand the needs of others, and act according to their ways of managing interactions with someone. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to analyze the eighth graders' interpersonal intelligence in mathematics learning. Research subjects were 49 students from SMP N 2 Sukoharjo and SMP N 2 Baki. In this study, data were obtained through an interpersonal intelligence questionnaire based on three aspects namely social sensitivity, social insight and social communication skills. The results of this study revealed that in SMP N 2 Sukoharjo 31% had interpersonal intelligence in the "high" category, 38% had interpersonal intelligence in the "moderate" category, and 31% had interpersonal intelligence in the "low" category. Furthermore, in SMP N 2 Baki 26% had interpersonal intelligence in the "high" category, 39% had interpersonal intelligence in the "modarate" category, and 35% had interpersonal intelligence in the "low" category. Therefore, it can be concluded that the average interpersonal intelligence of eighth grade students of SMP N 2 Baki and SMP N 2 Sukoharjo in mathematics learning has almost equal intelligence. To improve students' interpersonal intelligence, teachers should update learning models that are more interactive so that students are accustomed to interacting with the teacher and their friends.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Wati, W. (2010). Physics Learning Strategy (in Bahasa). Semarang: UNP.
Siregar, I. I. et al. (2019). The effect of team assisted individualization in mathematics learning reviewed from interpersonal intelligence. Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243 012130.
Dien, D. A., & Wustqa, D. U. (2018). The Interpersonal Intelligence Profile of Seventh-Grade Students in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Physics, Conf. Series 1108 012080.
Klaus, P. (2010). Communication Breakdown. California Job Journal. 28. 1-9.
Contreras, M. (2013). Interpersonal Skills For Entrepreneurs. Denmark: Bookboon.
Amstrong, T. (2014). You Are Smarter Than You Think: A Guide to Your Multiple Intelligences. Mumbai: Jaico Publishing House.
Pishghadam, R. (2009). Emotional and verbal intelligences in language learning. Iranian Journal of Language Studies. 3. 43–64.
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice (5th ed.). New York. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Yerizon, Y., et al. (2018). Student Responses Toward Student Worksheets Based on Discovery Learning for Students with Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Intelligence. Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 335 012113.
Mantzaris, J. (1999). Adding a dimension to career counselling. Focus on Basics. 3. 371.
Denevers, D. M. (2014). Interpersonal intelligence and problem-based learning. Master of education program theses. Paper 53.
Safitri, N., & Sriyamto. (2019). Correlation Relationships Between Perception of Interpersonal Intellegence with Affective Students in Curriculum Development in Elementary Teacher Education Study Program of Pakuan University. Journal of Humanities and Social Studies. 3(1). 1-4.
Macnamara, B. N., & Rupani, N. S. (2017). The relationship between intelligence and mindset. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 64. 52.
Azwar, S. (1996). Research Methods (in Bahasa). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Lwin, M., et al. (2008). How to Develop Various Components of Intelligence (in Bahasa). Jakarta :PT Indeks.
Chatib, M. (2012). Human School (in Bahasa), Bandung : Kaifa Learning.
Safaria, T. (2005). Interpersonal Intelligence : Children's Interpersonal Intelligence Development Method (in Bahasa). Yogyakarta: Amara Books.
Mohabashshernia, R., & Aghazadeh, S. M. (2018). The Relationship between the Interpersonal Intelligence and Reading Comprehension Achievment of Iranian Billingual and Muutilingual EFL Learners. International Journal of Research in English Education. 3(3). 13-20.
Yaumi, M. (2013). Learning Design Principles (in Bahasa). Jakarta: Kencana Media Grup.
Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research. 99(5). 307-317.
Kuncorowati, R. H. (2017). Mathematics creative thinking levels based on interpersonal intelligence. Journal of Physics, Conf. Series 943 012005.
Behjat, F. (2012). Interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences: Do they really work in foreign-language learning?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 32. 351-355.
Hidayat, E. (2014). Factors That Affect School Quality (in Bahasa). Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan. 21(1).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i7.1714
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.