Development and Empowerment of Peatland Ecosystem (Analysis of the Peat Ecosystem Recovery and Development Program in the Districts of Kutai Kartanegara and East Kutai, East Kalimantan Province)
Abstract
The province of East Kalimantan has significant peatlands. Covering an area of 700,000 HA, spread across Kutai Kartanegara Regency, East Kutai Regency and West Kutai Regency. This valuable asset must be empowered to be efficient for the life of the surrounding ecosystem. Swamp and freshwater fish habitat that is around peatlands is a natural potential that has historically been of economic value, which is a condition to be developed on the basis of an empowerment model. The people who live around the swamp and peat have traditionally made swamps and fish their main livelihoods. It is appropriate that the empowerment of peat ecosystems is one of the targets and strategic development agenda, with the support of recommendations from the results of scientific and professional studies.
Analysis of the study that began in the period April - November 2016 on the program of recovery and development of peat ecosystems, is one of the innovations to control the damage to peat ecosystems in order to provide solutions and new hopes for peat ecosystem recovery with the target of achieving sustainable prosperity. In 2019 the results of the analysis of this study have been verified and considered as a periodic monitoring and evaluation tool.
Analysis of the study was conducted in a participatory manner with the Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) principle. A number of analytical tools used by the process of finding data include the formation of a Peat Ecosystem Recovery and Control Work Team (TK-PPEG), preparation of a peat ecosystem-based social map, transect walk, and preparation of program options which are then packaged in the form of a Community Work Plan (RKM). The recommended forms of strategic programs include stabilizing water status on peatlands by building canal blocking and developing agricultural demonstration plots or fish cultivation.
The method of collecting data and information is done through observation, interviews and focused discussion or what is commonly called a focus group discussion (FGD). The data generated from the PRA tool is then analyzed descriptively to illustrate the strategies and programs that are the solution in the efforts to restore and control the peat ecosystem. A critical note is that the management of the peatland hydrological area for agricultural and fishery commodities, must pay attention to their suitability for their utilization and use space. Another aspect is the optimization of community participation in each stage.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adriansyah Samsura. (2003) Participatory Planning, Good Governance, dan Civil Society. Artikel. 9 Januari.
Agus Sarwo and Sri Subekti (2019), Pengelolaan Ekosistem Gambut Sebagai Upaya Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim Di Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Planologi Vol. 16, No. 2, Oktober 2019 Available: http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/psa
Chrislip, David D., and Larson, Carl E. (1994). Collaborative Leadership: How Citizens and Civic Leaders Can Make a Defference. San Fransisco: Jossy-Bass Publisher.
Darmawan, B, Y.I.Siregar, Sukendi and S.Zahrah. 2016. Pengelolaan keberlanjutan ekosistem hutan rawa gambut terhadap kebakaran hutan dan lahan di Semananjung Kampar, Sumatera. J.Manusia dan Lingkungan, Vol.23 (2) : 195 – 205;
Davis, Keith. (2000). Perilaku Dalam Organisasi, Edisi ketujuh. Jakarta: Penerbit: Erlangga
Efendi, Bachtiar. (2002). Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah Berkeadilan, Kurnia Kalam Semesta. Yogyakarta.
Elizabeth, Roosganda. (2007). Pemberdayaan Wanita Mendukung Strategi Gender Mainstreaming dalam Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian di Pedesaan. Bogor. Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian.
Gumilar, I. (2012). Partisipasi Masyarakat Pesisir dalam Pengelolaan Ekosistem Hutan Mangrove Berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Indramayu. Jurnal Akuatika. 3 (2): 198-211.
Hetifah Sj Sumarto (2004) A, Inovasi, Partisipasi dan Good Governance, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.
Hulme, David & M. Turner, (1990). Sociology of Development: Theories, Policies and Practices. Hertfordshire: Harvester Whearsheaf.
Jamie Ferguson et al., Seminar Prospectus: Co-management and resolving Conflict in Environmental Management dalam website: www. Uogelph.ca/-jford01/6280/prospectus.pdf. hal.5.
John Friedmann. (1987) Planning in The Public Domain, From Knowledge to Action, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Masri Singarimbun and Sofian Effendi. (1982) Metode Penelitian Survai, LP3ES, Jakarta.
Mawardi, I. 2007. Rehabilitasi dan revitalisasi eks proyek pengembangan lahan gambut di Kalimantan Tengah. J.Tek.Ling. Vol.8 (3): 287 – 297.
Nasrul, B, Suwondo, A.Hamzah, Idwar, S.Nedi and Sunardi. 2012. Model pengelolaan perkebunan kelapa sawit berkelanjutan pada lahan gambut di Provinis Riau. J.Agrotek.Trop. Vol 1(1) : 8-13.
Najiyati, S, A.Asmana, and I.N.N.Suryadiputra. (2005). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Lahan Gambut. Wetlands International-Indonesia Programme. Jakarta.
Noor, Muhammad. (2001). Pertanian Lahan Gambut: Potensi dan Kendala. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Noor, Y.R and J. Heyde. (2007). Pengelolaan Lahan Gambut Berbasis Masyarakat di Indonesia. Wetlands International-Indonesia Programme. Jakarta
Owin Jamasy. (2004). Keadilan, Pemberdayaan dan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Jakarta, Traju-Mizan.
Richard Krueger (1988) Focus Groups: A Pratical Guide for Applied Research, Sage Publication.
Rosyani, Z, B.Haryadi. (2019). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pencegahan dan pengendalian kebakaran lahan gambut di hutan lindung gambut (HLG) Londerang Provinsi Jambi. J.Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Vol 1 (1) : 16 – 39.
Slamet, Margono. (2003). Membentuk Pola Perilaku Manusia Pembangunan. IPB Press.
Soetrisno, Loekman. (2000). Menuju Masyarakat Partisipatif. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius
Straus, David. (2002). How to Make Collaboration Work: Powerful Way to Build Consenssus, Solve Problems, and Make Decisions. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Susan Dawson, Lenore Manderson, and Veronica L. Tallo. (1993) A Manual for the Use of Focus Group Group, INFDC, US , USA.
Suryono, Agus, (2001). Teori dan Isu Pembangunan, UM-Press, Jakarta
Sumodiningrat, Gunawan. (1999). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Jaring Pengaman Sosial, Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Susandi, Oksana, and A.T.Arminudin. (2015). Analisis sifat fisika tanah gambut pada hutan gambut di Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar Provinsi Riau. J.Agroteknologi. Vol.5 (2) : 23-28.
Tata, H.L. B.H.Narendra and Mawazin. (2017). Tingkat kerawanan kebakaran gambut di Kabupaten Musi Banyuasin, Sumatera Selatan. J.Penelitian Hutan Tanaman Vol 14 (1):51-71.
Titi Kalima and Denny (2019). Komposisi Jenis Dan Struktur Hutan Rawa Gambut Taman Nasional Sebangau, Kalimantan Tengah, Jurnal Vol 16, No 1
Yuliani, F, and A.Rahman. (2018). Metode restorasi gambut dalam konteks mitigasi bencana kebakaran lahan gambut dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Sosio Informa, Vol.4 (2): 488-460.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1658
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.