The Implementation of Ultra Petita Decisionsin Civil Dispute

Heru Sugiyono, Heru Suyanto, Suherman Suherman


The implementation of ultra petita in the decision of civil disputes becomes a very interesting study to be discussed, many parties who agree to the application of ultra petita on the pretext as a path to substantive justice, but those who think the application of ultra petita is considered contrary to the principle of legal certainty. The research method used was normative juridical research that is research conducted by examining library materials which include primary legal materials sourced from various laws and regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of explanations used to analyze primary legal materials in the form of expert views, academics, searching documents, books and scientific papers. Then, the legal material was identified and analyzed to achieve the objectives of this research. The results showed that the application of the ultra petita ruling in civil disputes was not in accordance with the principle of rule of law which could result in the ruling being legally flawed or invalid. To minimize the application of decisions that contain ultra petita, in civil disputes can adopt the procedural law in force in the State Administrative Court related to the preparatory inspection stage, it was the existence of the judge's authority to advise the Plaintiff to improve if the lawsuit is unclear/complete by giving a grace period that is proper before examining the subject matter of the dispute begins.


Implementation; Decision; Ultra Petita

Full Text:




Abdul Hamid, 2016, Teori Hukum Modern, Pustaka Setia, Bandung.

Adies Kadir, 2018, Menyelamatkan Wakil Tuhan Memperkuat Peran Dan Kedudukan Hakim.PT. Semesta Merdeka Utama, Jakarta.

Bambang Sugeng, 2012, Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Djamanat Samosir, 2012, Hukum Acara Perdata, Tahap-Tahap Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata, Nuansa Aulia. Bandung.

EkoSugitario, 2012, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Brilian Internasional, Surabaya.

Harahap, Yahya 2005, Hukum Acara Perdata, SinarGrafika, Jakarta.

Lubis, Suhrawardi K. 2002, Etika Profesi Hakim, SinarGrafika, Jakarta.

Moh. Taufik Makarao, 2004, Pokok – Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Retnowulan, 2005, Hukum Acara PerdatadalamTeori dan Praktek, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Law :

Undang-UndangNomor 14 Tahun 1985 TentangMahkamah Agung.

Undang – Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 TentangPeradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Undang-UndangNomor 5 Tahun 2004 TentangPerubahanAtasUndang-UndangNomor14 Tahun 1985 TentangMahkamah Agung.

Undang-UndangNomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentangKekuasaanKehakiman.

Undang – Undang No. 51 Tahun 2009 TentangPerubahanKeduaatasUndang – Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 TentangPeradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Het HerzienneIndonesischReglement (HIR)

RechtsreglementBuitengewesten (RBg)

Court Ruling:

PutusanPengadilan Negeri Depok No. 234/Pdt.G/2017/PN.DPK

PutusanMahkamah Agung RepublikIndonesia No. 556K/ Sip/1971

PutusanMahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 1097K/Pdt/2009

PutusanMahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 29 K/Sip/1950

PutusanMahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 1001K/Sip/1972



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.