Epochal Challenges: the Robotic Revelation in Anthropology
Abstract
In this technological epoch, the development of cyborgs and robots has affected perceptions inside and outside anthropology as a new thinking model of knowledge construction. Moore (2003: 7) asserts that ‘science and technology are transforming anthropological knowledge through a transformation of its objects of enquiry’. The robotic technology has posed potential threats as well as brought new hopes to the field of anthropology. This essay illustrates both sides in terms of three anthropological topics—(i) identity; (ii) family structures and values; and (iii) religion. Through analysis, it shows the importance of reducing risks through regulations, seizing opportunities through rethinking old concepts and applying new techniques to the existing knowledge. Moreover, a pioneering spirit is called to face challenges and to make contributions for humanity’s sake.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bainbridge, W. S. (2006). Cyberimmortality: Science, religion, and the battle to save our souls. The Futurist, 40(2): 25.
Bell, D., (2007). Cyberculture Theorists: Manuel Castells and Donna Haraway. Routledge.
Braidotti, R., (2006). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, culture & society. 23(7-8): 197-208.
Dumit, J. And D. Robbie. (1998).“Cyborg Babies”. In Davis-Floyd, R. and Dumit, J. (eds), Cyborg Babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots. Psychology Press.
Durkheim, E. and J.W. Swain. (2008). The elementary forms of the religious life. Courier Corporation.
Einstein, A., (1940). November. Science and religion. Conference on Science, Philosophy and Religion Their Relation to The Democratic Way of Life.
Geraci, R.M., (2017). Spiritual robots: Religion and our scientific view of the natural world. Theology and Science. 4(3): 229-246.
Gray, C. H., H. J. Figueroa-Sarriera, and S. Mentor. (1995). The cyborg handbook. London: Routledge.
Gray, C. H., (2002). Cyborg citizen: Politics in the posthuman age. London: Routledge.
Haraway, D., (2004). A manifesto for cyborgs. The Body: Alternative bodies. 5 (119851), 17.
Halpern, D. and J.E. Katz. (2012). Unveiling robotophobia and cyber-dystopianism: The role of gender, technology and religion on attitudes towards robots. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference. 139-140. IEEE.
Haraway, D., (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness (Vol. 1). Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Hogle, L. F., (1995). Standardization across non-standard domains: The case of organ procurement. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 20(4): 482-500.
Haraway, D., (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs:Science, technology, and social feminism in the 1980s. Feminism/postmodernism. 190-233.
Hori, M., (1986). Artificial liver: present and future. Artificial organs. 10(3): 211-213.
Kondo, D. (1990). Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. University of Chicago Press.
Love, R., (2001). Robot futures: science fiction and futures studies methodologies in action. Futures. 33(10): 883-889.
Moore, H. (ed.). (2003). The future of anthropological knowledge. Routledge.
Ricoeur, P., (1991). Narrative identity. Philosophy today. 35(1): 73-81.
Robertson, J. (2007). Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Humanoid robots and the posthuman family. Critical Asian Studies. 39(3): 369-398.
Schodt, F. L. (1988). Inside the robot kingdom. Kodansha.
Tamatea, L., (2008). If robots R–US, who am I: Online ‘Christian’responses to artificial intelligence. Culture and Religion. 9 (2): 141-160.
Wilde, O., (1914). The Soul of Man. Humphreys.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i1.152
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.