Factors That Determine Apparatus Performance Improvement in Realizing Good Governance

Muh. Nasir Mahmud, Zulkarnain Hamson

Abstract


Improved apparatus performance is needed to support the realization of Good Governance, therefore it is necessary to look at the factors that determine the Apparatus Performance Improvement. The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that determine the improvement of the performance of the state apparatus in realizing good governance in Luwu Regency. The research method used is descriptive method with the object of research is a local government organization that includes, Agency, Offices and Work Units in Luwu Regency. Furthermore, the sample size of each agency is determined proportionally on the basis of the large population in each agency regarding the program and the results of the agency's performance evaluation. The minimum sample size is 98 respondents. The results of the study showed the availability of funds to support the implementation of public service tasks in Luwu Regency government agencies had been carried out properly, increased apparatus performance by increasing public trust in agencies, transparency, accountability of officials, and service certainty had been carried out by district government agencies Luwu well.

 


Keywords


Performance Improvement; Apparatus; Good Governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World development, 28(1), 21-39.

Huther, J., & Shah, A. (2005). A simple measure of good governance. Public services delivery, 39.

Insani, N. (2020). Apparatus Professionalism and Public Service Ethics. Journal La Sociale, 1(1), 25-28.

Kilpatrick, A. J. (2001). Transparent frameworks, fiscal rules and policy-making under uncertainty. Fiscal Rules and Policy-Making Under Uncertainty (February 1, 2001).

Labolo, M., & Indrayani, E. (2017). Bureaucratic reform and the challenge of good governance implementation in Indonesia. Journal Of Asian Review Of Public Affair And Policy, 2(4), 25-47.

Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in organizational behavior, 24, 181-224.

Martono, S. (2013). Strategi peningkatan kinerja program studi melalui optimalisasi peran pimpinan. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 4(1).

Simon, Y., Mas' ud, M., & Su'un, M. (2016). The role of apparatus competence, internal control system on good governance and the quality of financial statement information. Researchers World, 7(4), 123.

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public administration, 87(2), 234-258.

Swinburne, M., & Castello-Branco, M. (1991). Central bank independence and central bank functions. P. Downes and R. Vaez-Zadeh eds, 414-44.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i2.1495

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.