Writing Ability of Research Proposal for Students of Economic Education FKIP UMMY Solok Academic Year 2018/2019

Desi Armi Eka Putri

Abstract


This study aims to determine and analyze: 1) How are students' responses related to scientific responsibility and scientific publications that must be fulfilled by students of FKIP UMMY Solok academic year 2018/2019, 2). How is the ability to write research proposals for students of economic education FKIP UMMY Solok in the academic year 2018/2019 which includes quantitative, qualitative research and classroom action research, 3). Weakness or shortage of economic education students of FKIP UMMY Solok in the academic year 2018/2019 in mastering quantitative, qualitative research and classroom action research. Data collection tools in this study are researchers and teams equipped with interview guidelines, observation guidelines and documentation to ensure the validity of the data refers to the credibility standard because the standards are suitable and easier to analyze so that the data and research will be more accurate. The guarantee of the validity of data with this standard is carried out with more diligent observation and triangulation of data.

The results of research and discussion, 1) writing scientific papers that students are doing is just a demand to complete education, 2) research that they think (students) is easier, namely research with quantitative methods, 3) that makes them late in writing research proposals is because they are lazy and that causes them to be late in completing their research proposals.


Full Text:

PDF

References


W.J.S. Porwadarminta, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1991

Anas Sudijono, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 996.

Anas Yusuf.. Managemen Pembelajaran Dan Instruksi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: IRCIsod. 2009.

W.S. Winkel. Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia. 1996. 245p.

Nana Sudjana. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya,2008. 24p

Suke Silverius. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar dan Umpan Balik. Cetakan Ke-1. Jakarta: PT Grasindo. 1991. 43-44p

Mahmud. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia; 2011. 81p.

Afrizal. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada; 2015. 12p.

Winter, G. A Comparative Discussion of the Notion of 'Validity' in Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 4(3), 1-14. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol4/iss3/4. 2000; 9-16p.

Afrizal. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada; 2015. 39p.

Mahmud. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia; 2011. 85p.

Mahmud. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia; 2011. 199p.

Somekh, B. The Contribution of Action Research to Development in Social Endeavours: a position paper on action research methodology. British Education Research Journal. 1995;21(3): 2-17p.

Istarani. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Medan: CV Iscom; 38p.

lyons, L.H and Heasley.B Study Writing. United Kingdom: Canbridge, 2009.

Sugiyono.Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.2013.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i5.1231

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.