Factors That Affect Governance of Land Administration Services in Anjatan District

Junaedi Junaedi


This study aims to determine the factors that affect governance of land administration services in Anjatan District. This research uses descriptive research method through a qualitative approach. Data collection is done by interviewing through written questions and tests, criteria and documentation. This study uses a data analysis model that is data collection, data reduction, data presentation, drawing conclusions / verification of the data found. The results of this study indicate that there are weaknesses in the availability of facilities due to the blank form and cause problems for the community. In addition to overcoming the low quality of land services, it is necessary to improve the HR of the Apparatus, namely through formal and non-formal education. For formal education it seems that it is still quite difficult to implement because of the limited funds and opportunities available. The most possible is non-formal education through education and training such as structural training and technical training. Accountability needs to be improved, especially related to the behavior of employees on duty is still less effective.


Service Governance; Administration; Land

Full Text:



Ardhian, M. (2017). Kementerian Pertahanan Dapat Rapor Merah Mengenai Pelayanan Publik. Accessed October 20, 2019. Available form: https://katadata.co.id/berita/2017/12/07/kementerian-pertahanan-dapat-rapor-merah-mengenai-pelayanan-publik.

Barr, A., Lindelow, M., & Serneels, P. (2004). To serve the community or oneself: the public servant’s dilemma. The World Bank.

Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik: Peduli Inklusif Dan Kolaborasi. UGM PRESS.

Hilda, N. (2014). Strategi Inovasi Layanan dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Surabaya II. Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 2(1), 1-10.

Hitt, M. A., & Duane, R. (2002). The essence of strategic leadership: Managing human and social capital. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 3-14.

LAN. (2006). Strategi Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: LAN.

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.

Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public administration review, 367-373.

Robiyanur, M., & Riady, G. (2017). Analisis Penilaian Masyarakat Terhadap Kinerja Pelayanan Publik Pemerintah Kabupaten Kutai Timur (Studi Kasus Kec. Muara Wahau). Jurnal Administrative Reform (JAR), 2(1), 61-73.

Suwarno, J. (2012). Kualitas Pelayanan Pemerintahan Desa (Studi Pelayanan Ktp Dan Kk Di Desa Teluk Kepayang Kecamatan Kusan Hulu Kabupaten Tanah Bumbu). Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Pemerintahan Lokal, 1(2).

Widodo, J. (2001). Good Governance: Telaah dari Dimensi Akuntabilitas dan Kontrol Birokrasi pada Era Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah. Insan Cendekia.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i6.1229


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.