Effectiveness of Critical Thinking about Radicalism Issue (CTRI) on Critical Reading Activities: A Quasi Experimental Study
Abstract
This research explains about increasing the ability to think critically to ward off radical issues in critical reading activities in college. This research approach uses a quasi-Times Design Series with Control Group experiment that uses two classes of the same level. The analysis of this study used One Way Anova with a significance level of 0.05. The results and discussion of this study indicate there is significance, namely 0.049 in the final test of the two groups, which means that there are significant differences in CTRI (Critical Thingking about Radicalism Issue) on critical reading learning. Thus, CTRI (Critical Thingking about Radicalism Issue) has a significant effect on critical reading learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baek Jiyeon & Choi Jin Oh. (2012). The Effects of a Reading Comprehension Monitoring Strategy on Critical Reading, Reading Efficacy, and Reading Attitudes. Journal Of Research In Curriculum Instruction, 16(2), 421-439. doi: 10.24231/rici.2012.16.2.421
Deszcz-Tryhubczak, J. (2018). Reading About Solidarity and Collective Action: Social Minds in Radical Fantasy Fiction. Children's Literature in Education.
Ferguson, I., & Lavalette, M. (2013). Critical and radical social work: an introduction. Critical And Radical Social Work, 1(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1332/204986013x665938
Hariyati, N. R. (2016).Implementasi Strategi Membaca 3 P (Perluas Jangkauan Mata, Percepat Gerak Mata, Dan Perkecil Regresi) Di Sma Negeri 1 Ngoro-Jombang. Inovasi 10 (4), 325-338
Hariyati, N. R. & Syakur, A. (2018). Penerapan Strategi Membaca Kritis Di Akademi Farmasi Surabaya Untuk Menunjang Kecakapan Literasi Menuju Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Internasional 1 (1)
Hariyati, N. R. & Ahmadi, A. (2018). Effectiveness Learning of Critical Reading Using Susiso Model. 2nd Workshop on Language, Literature and Society for Education. Proceeding international conference.
Holm, N. (2018). Critical capital: cultural studies, the critical disposition and critical reading as elite practice. Cultural Studies, 1-24. doi: 10.1080/09502386.2018.1549265
Marsden, E., & Torgerson, C.J. (2012). Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 583–616.
Öz, Ö. and Eder, M. (2018), ‘Problem Spaces’ and Struggles Over the Right to the City: Challenges of Living Differentially in a Gentrifying Istanbul Neighborhood. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 42: 1030-1047. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12656
Pattison, S., Gutwill, J., Auster, R. and Cannady, M. (2019). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs in Visitor Studies: A Critical Reflection on Three Projects. Visitor Studies, 22(1), pp.43-66.
Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2012). The International Critical Thinking Reading and Writing Test. USA: Tomales.
White, H., & S. Sabarwal (2014). Quasi-experimental Design and Methods, Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 8, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.
Marsden, E., & Torgerson, C.J. (2012). Single group, pre- and post-test research designs:
Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 583–616.
Woodward, R. (2013). Some reflections on critical and radical social work literature. Critical And Radical Social Work, 1(1), 135-140. doi: 10.1332/204986013x666045
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.1019
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.