Comparison of Liberal and Republican Citizenship Theories in Various Countries
Abstract
The rapid development of globalization needs to be filtered according to Pancasila. If we examine the French state, it can be seen that the republican model of citizenship is ideal for the pluralism of Brubaker and Cooper (Lurbe, 2015). Estonia has received a high international assessment for the quality of liberal democracy (Khoma & Kokoriev, 2021). Therefore, we can instill the spirit of tolerance, and pluralism and maintain democracy in accordance with Pancasila. The aim of this research is to determine liberal and republican citizenship theories, as well as their comparisons in various countries. The type of research used is a literature study. A literature study is said to be a type of research carried out through the process of collecting data such as books, documents, articles, and so on (Saputri & Nuryono, 2018). The results of this research show that the theory of republican citizenship in Turkey, for example, the armed forces, is identified as a disciplined organization that defends the Republican regime (Kardam & Cengiz, 2011). In the context of the Republic of Indonesia, republicans played a role in gaining independence (Wicaksono, 2019). Meanwhile, the comparison is that liberal citizenship theory prioritizes freedom while republican citizenship theory focuses on the spirit of struggle. The conclusion is that liberal and republican theories of citizenship are suitable for one country and less suitable for another country. This is certainly influenced by the country's background.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ando, C. (2018). Religion, toleration, and religious liberty in republican empire. History of European Ideas, 44(6), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2018.1513245
Bell, D. R. (2005). Liberal environmental citizenship. Environmental Politics, 14(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010500054863
Bellini, P. (n.d.). 21St-Century Liberal Democracy and Its Contradictions. 114–124.
Blanco, A. F. (2015). Some considerations on the influence of economic liberalism in the May Revolution of 1810 in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ijhe.2015.v2.n1.49772
Bruce, L. D. (2020). Home Feelings: Liberal Citizenship and the Canadian Reading Camp Movement. American Review of Canadian Studies, 50(4), 586–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2020.1843756
Chung, R. (2003). The cosmopolitan scope of republican citizenship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 6(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230510001702713
Dahliyana, A., Nurdin, E. S., Budimansyah, D., & Suryadi, A. (2020). Pendidikan pendahuluan bela negara melalui pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 17(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i2.27919
Ducoulombier, A. (2002). Parity is about “race”: French republican citizenship and the French Caribbean. Modern & Contemporary France, 10(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639480120107587
Effendi, W. R. (2018). KONSEPSI KEWARGANEGARAAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF TRADISI LIBERAL DAN REPUBLIKAN Winda. Jurnal Trias Politica, 2(1).
Elazar, Y., & Milikowsky, N. (2020). Ethnicizing the republic: the strange career of the concept of republican citizenship in Israel. Citizenship Studies, 24(6), 786–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1720607
Hindess, B. (2002). Neo-liberal citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 6(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020220142932
Idris, M. (2017). Potret Pemikiran Radikal Jaringan Islam Liberal (Jil) Indonesia. Kalam, 8(2), 367. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v8i2.227
Karaveli, H. M. (2010). An unfulfilled promise of enlightenment: Kemalism and its liberal critics. Turkish Studies, 11(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683841003747054
Kardam, F., & Cengiz, K. (2011). Republican citizenship in Turkey: Historical development, perceptions and practices. Middle Eastern Studies, 47(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2011.535677
Kariadi, D. (2016). Revitalisasi Nilai-Nilai Edukatif Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Untuk Membangun Masyarakat Berwawasan Global Berjiwa Nasionalis. Jurnal PIPSI (Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Indonesia), 1(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpipsi.v1i1.112
Khoma, N., & Kokoriev, O. (2021). Deconsolidation of Liberal Democracy in the Baltic States. The Issue of Compliance with the EU Standards at Institutional and Value Levels. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 21(1), 39–57.
King, L. (2010). Liberal citizenship: Medieval cities as model and metaphor. Space and Polity, 14(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2010.505789
Lewicki, A. (2017). The blind spots of liberal citizenship and integration policy. Patterns of Prejudice, 51(5), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2017.1389350
Long, K. (2011). Refugees, repatriation and liberal citizenship. History of European Ideas, 37(2), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.10.016
Lurbe I Puerto, K. (2015a). The insertion of Roma in Sénart Project (2000–2007): a local minority-targeted affirmative action following in the footsteps of the French republican citizenship model. Identities, 22(6), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2014.950968
Lurbe I Puerto, K. (2015b). The insertion of Roma in Sénart Project (2000–2007): a local minority-targeted affirmative action following in the footsteps of the French republican citizenship model. Identities, 22(6), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2014.950968
McBride, W. L. (2020). Western Liberalism At Twilight (?). Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 25(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2019-25-2-11
Nash, K. (2001). Feminism and contemporary liberal citizenship: The undecidability of “women.” Citizenship Studies, 5(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020120085234
Nurvenayanti, I. (2016). Teori-Teori Kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 2, 101–108.
Patton, C. (2014). Defacing Levinas: vision, veiling and the ethics of republican citizenship in France. Social Identities, 20(2–3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2013.878990
Pérez Salazar, M. (2003). La razón liberal. Economía, política y ética en la obra de John Stuart Mill. Books, 1. https://ideas.repec.org/b/ext/public/27.html#download
Rahma, D., & Dewi., D. A. (2021). Aktualisasi Pancasila sebagai pandangan hidup bangsa Indonesia dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Jurpis: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 18(1), 63-74.
Roberts, T. M. (2018). Republican citizenship in the post-Civil War South and French Algeria 1865–1900. American Nineteenth Century History, 19(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664658.2018.1441646
Rodriguez, R. (2009). Del feminismo liberal al deconstructivismo de género. 2009. /citations?view_op=view_citation&continue=/scholar%3Fhl%3Des%26as_sdt%3D0,5%26scilib%3D1%26scioq%3D%2522un%2Bcuarto%2Bpropio%2522&citilm=1&citation_for_view=bZjqczkAAAAJ:MLfJN-KU85MC&hl=es&oi=p
Rosenthal, J. (2015). The Fiscal History of Boyacá, 1863-1886: Liberal Dreams and Limited Resources. Tiempo y Economía, 2(2), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.21789/24222704.1058
Samidi, R., Kusuma, W. J., Artikel, I., Juni, D., Juni, D., & Juni, D. (2020). ANALISIS KRITIS EKSISTENSI NILAI PATRIOTISME DALAM PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/harmony
Saputri, M. O., & Nuryono, W. (2018). Studi Kepustakaan Konseling Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Untuk Mengurangi Kecanduan Game Online. Ejournal.Unesa.Ac.Id, 801–817. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-bk-unesa/article/view/45865/38718
Scott, K. (1996). The Dilemma of Liberal Citizenship: Women and Social Assistance Reform in the 1990s. Studies in Political Economy, 50(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.1996.11675335
Thompson, M. J. (2021). Rousseau’s Post-Liberal Self: Emile and the Formation of Republican Citizenship. European Legacy, 26(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2020.1823623
Trihantoyo, S., Herachwati, N., & Purwono, R. (2021). Teacher Competence Based on Digital Quotient as Instructional Leadership. Ilmu Pendidikan: Jurnal Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Kependidikan, 6(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.17977/um027v6i22021p067
Turner, J. (2014). Testing the liberal subject: (in)security, responsibility and “self-improvement” in the UK citizenship test. Citizenship Studies, 18(3–4), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2014.905273
Udasmoro, W. (2010). Discourse Subaltern dalam Masyarakat Interkultural: Mencermati Relasi Gender Jilbab dan Perempuan Berjilbab di Prancis. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 14(1), 1–22.
Volodymyr, P., & Nataliia, R. (2017). From Protectionism to Neo-Protectionism: New Dimensions of Liberal Regulation. International Economic Policy, 2(27), 90–111. https://doaj.org/article/01374b9d8dcc48d2837cafc7b095fb84
Wahyuddin, Irianti Bandu, M. H. (2021). KEBIJAKAN DAN POLITIK INTEGRASI IMIGRAN DI PRANCIS. URNAL ILMU BUDAYA, 9(2).
Wicaksono, A. (2019). MAKNA PERJUANGAN DALAM NOVEL INDONESIA BERLATAR PERANG KEMERDEKAAN (TINJAUAN NEW HISTORICISM GREENBLATT). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 18(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v18i2.15509
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i8.5976
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.