The Comparative Study of Islamic Commentators and Theologians Views Over Qurans Verses Seemingly Implying That the Islam Prophet Wasn’t Innocent (P.B.U) (Adame Esmat)

Abstract

This paper attempts to compare three sects of Islamic commentatorsُand theologians’ views Ashare٫ Mutazileh٫ and Imamiye about several subjects conversational overIslam prophet ’ s(P.B.U) infallibility. Regarding the studies conducted in this respect٫ a complete and comparative research has not been carried out on the prophetُs infallibility or ”Esmat” among the m .Therefore٫the purpose of this study is to plan a separate research need to find out the views of these there sects from believersُpoint of view. Through this study٫it has been proven that from the Imamiyeُs point٫ the Islam prophet is infallible or never wrong and never making mistake whether deadly sins or minor ones whether intentional sin s or involuntary ones٫ but Sunni٫ including Ashare and Mutazileh consider minor and involuntary sins or sins before call to prophet hood or" tark oela" allowing him (p.b.u).