The Influence of Legal Culture on Government Officials on the Implementation of the Decision of the State Administrative Court

Abstract

The public views the State Administrative Court, hereinafter referred to as the State Administrative Court, as a Toothless Tiger due to the absence of an Executional Institution or a strong legal basis, resulting in executions not going well and completely. The reason for all of this is because of the existence of a legal culture that affects the level of legal compliance of government officials which is still very weak. The execution of decisions with legal force should still be carried out automatically by Government Officials (defendant) themselves, and a consistent attitude of Government Officials in enforcing administrative law is required. Government Officials who do not carry out court decisions that have permanent legal force are the same as Government Officials who fail to carry out their roles as state organs who have violated the orders of their positions and this becomes a bad legal culture. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of the influence of legal culture on government officials in implementing the Administrative Court Decisions. This study uses a normative juridical legal research method, with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the legal culture of government officials greatly influences the implementation of court decisions. Therefore, to form a legal culture for government officials to carry out state administrative court decisions, it must be supported by three factors, namely legal factors with clear sanctions, law enforcement factors, namely the existence of executable decisions and implementation of decisions, and finally the official factor, namely the willingness and the will of the official as a tribute to himself. These three factors are cumulative factors that work together to form a legal culture.