The Ideas of a Total Bankruptcy Moratory and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations in the Emergency of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Suwardi Suwardi, Erick Wiryadharma

Abstract


The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The Bankruptcy Law and PDPO are special laws that cannot be seen from one side/aspect, because many parties are involved in the PDPO -Bankruptcy Law. With the PDPO, many cases have ended peacefully, how many debts have been successfully restructured, how many businesses have finally improved. The moratorium also does not close the efforts of creditors to collect. The PDPO moratorium and bankruptcy do not remove the debtor's obligation to settle his responsibilities. Creditors can take other legal remedies such as civil lawsuits, mortgage execution rights, arbitration, mediation, bilateral restructuring and others outside the PDPO and bankruptcy channels. Likewise, the methods and patterns of restructuring of debtors also develop according to the needs and developments of the times. Business continuity is a priority, considering the increasing economic needs of the community.  All forms of business that are part of the economic wheel must continue to spin, so that in the event of financial difficulties, PDPO is an alternative solution that can be taken by debtors and creditors. In addition to considering the PDPO and bankruptcy moratorium, it would also be better if the government immediately completed the Bankruptcy Bill and PDPO as an improvement from the previous Bankruptcy Law and PDPO.


Keywords


PDPO; Legal; Bankruptcy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhinugroho, Bagaskara. 2021. “Dampak Peningkatan Restrukturisasi Utang Akibat Covid-19 Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Perbankan.” Pp. 19–23 in The 2nd Seminar Nasional ADPI Mengabdi Untuk Negeri Pengabdian Masyarakat di Era New Normal. Vol. 2.

Aji, Bondan Seno, Made Warka, and Evi Kongres. 2021. “Penerapan Klausula Force Majeure Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19.” Jurnal Akrab Juara 6(1).

Anggoro, Teddy. n.d. “Pihak-Pihak Yang Akan Terdampak Moratorium Kepailitan Dan PKPU.” Jurnal Hukum & Pasar Modal, Himpunan Konsultan Hukum Pasar Modal (HKHPM) Vol.VII, 2021.

Anon. 2020. “KONSEPTUAL TENTANG KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK DAN PERLINDUNGAN BAGI PARA PIHAK DALAM SUATU PERJANJIAN KREDIT.” LEX PRIVATUM 7(6).

Anon. n.d. “Rasionalitas Moratorium PKPU-Pailit vs Konsep Temporary Measures Di Beberapa Negara.” Retrieved November 26, 2021 (https://www.hukumonline.com/stories/article/lt6139e6643e598/rasionalitas-moratorium-pkpu-pailit-vs-konsep-temporary-measures-di-beberapa-negara).

Gunadi. 2001. Restrukturisasi Perusahaan Dalam Berbagai Bentuk Dan Pemajakannya. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Michael, Tomy. 2019. “PERMASALAHAN HUKUM DALAM PERATURAN WALIKOTA SURABAYA NOMOR 21 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG TATA CARA PENYELENGGARAAN REKLAME.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. doi: 10.30996/dih.v15i1.2267.

Mulajadi, Kartini. 2001. Pengertian Prinsip-Prinsip Umum Hukum Kepailitan, Dalam Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Melalui Pailit Atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Alumni.

Sevim, Adnan. 2021. “Evaluation of Financial Statements of Sports Clubs for 2019 and 2020 Operational Periods in Terms of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Research in Terms of Financial Risk.” Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance and Risk Management 8(1). doi: 10.51410/jcgirm.8.1.8.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i1.3375

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU) ISSN 2364-5369
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.