Pattern of Accommodation of Administrative Law in Corruption Management
Abstract
This study aims to describe the pattern of accommodating administrative law in dealing with corruption. This type of research is a juridical research with a qualitative doctrinal approach. Indonesia in Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration regulates the legal basis and guidelines for every government administration official in making decisions, preventing abuse of authority and closing opportunities for corruption. However, at the level of implementation, it does not run optimally as evidenced by the trend of handling corruption in 2016 - 2018 by the Corruption Eradication Commission which has increased both at the level of investigation, investigation, prosecution, Inkracht and execution. Therefore, optimizing the accommodation of state administrative law in fighting corruption is part of preventive efforts to detect corruption early.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Absori. (2016). “Cita Hukum Indonesia”. Surakarta: Pustaka Iltizam.
Absori, A., Nurhayati, N., Bangsawan, M., Budiono, A., Achmadi, A., & Nugroho, H. S. W. (2020). Green and Health Constitution of Green Open Space and Its Implementation in Surakarta. Journal of Global Pharma Technology, 12(9), 70-74
Anggara, S. (2018). Hukum Administrasi Negara.
Anggoro, F. N. (2016). Pengujian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Terhadap Keputusan Dan/Atau Tindakan Pejabat Pemerintahan Oleh PTUN. Fiat Justisia, 10(4), 647-670.
Arifin, Z., & Irsan, I. (2019). Korupsi Perizinan Dalam Perjalanan Otonomi Daerah Di Indonesia. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 887-896.
Bangsawan, M. I., & Budiono, A. (2021). Welfare-Based Natural Resource Policy in the Land Sector: Maqasid Asy-Syari’ah Perspective. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(3), 453-459.
Bangsawan, M. (2018). Pendidikan Karakter Terhadap Anak Jalanan Sebagai Korban Eksploitasi Anak di Kota Surakarta, Indonesia. Seminar Nasional GEOTIK 2018.
Bangsawan, M., & Gustiandi Candra Imansyah, R. (2017). Pengembangan Industri Kreatif Melalui Pemberdayaan Etika Bisnis Yang Islami.
Butt, S., & Schütte, S. A. (2014). Assessing judicial performance in Indonesia: the court for corruption crimes. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(5), 603-619.
Fanani, M. Z., & Zamroni, M. (2018). Function and Role of Administrative Law in the Prevention and Combating of Corruption in Indonesia. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum: Cogito Ergo Sum, 1(1), 9-14.
Friedman, L. M. (2009). Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Heriyanto, B. (2018). Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Paradigma UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Pakuan Law Review, 4(1).
Kasim, A. (2013). Bureaucratic Reform and Dynamic Goernance for Combating Corruption: The Challenge for Indonesia. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1).
Kurniawan, T. (2011, June). Democratic decentralization and corruption in Indonesia: Why decentralization has caused head of regions affected by corruption cases. In Conference on Decentralization and Democratization in Southeast Asia (pp. 15- 17).
Putrijanti, A., Leonard, L. T., & Utama, K. W. (2018). Peran PTUN dan AUPB Menuju Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik (Good Governance). Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(2), 277-290.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i1.3230
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://ijmmu.com
editor@ijmmu.com
facebook.com/ijmmu
Copyright © 2014-2018 IJMMU. All rights reserved.